AiA wrote on Oct 6^th, 2014 at 11:01pm:


Just taking a very, very wild guess here, AiA.  Maybe they do not like swimming in your sewer where (for very recent example) a Moderator will enter the account of a Member and alter what that Member posted?  Did you do that AiA?  Was that you?

If you did that and I was Admin., your wheels would be spinning out of the place.  So far, skippy is protecting the guilty, corrupt Moderator, and that would not happen under any fair, honest and decent Leadership.

Aussie wrote on Oct 6^th, 2014 at 10:59pm:


So all those genuine ones according to you, that voted for you but were disenfranchised are happy to cop it and none of them have mentioned a thing, not here nor over there?

Do you know how ridiculous you are sounding?  How much like a liar? 

And please give over on the PM discussion poo, it is childish, but seeing as though you did bring it up, you discussed my identity over there, claiming that you had PM discussions that you could not divulge where you had identified me.

Over to you bozo, I have no fear of those PM discussions, any and all participants can reveal what they said, open book.  I don't do bannings or request for bannings and I release them from any bonds of confidentiality.

So what is my identity Aussie?  You willing to back yourself?

Aussie wrote on Oct 6^th, 2014 at 11:21pm:


Not sure any one is buying your evasions or ridiculous propositions.

Aussie is doing his best to muddy the waters ... Why hasn't a single one of your *genuine* OzPol members come to your defense at PA Aussie?

this is getting better and better
Am still waiting for your OzPol friends to post at PA

Aussie wrote on Oct 7^th, 2014 at 12:08am:


The man is truly deluded. 

AiA wrote on Oct 6^th, 2014 at 11:01pm:


In my case, there are two reasons.

Firstly, my application for membership wasn't approved until after the voting, and
Secondly, as a newbie who didn't get to vote, I didn't think it was my place to comment.

I see no evidence that I've been 'imped' at all.

How odd that none of the fake "imped" accounts are speaking out to defend Aussie.

Seems that it might be fairly obvious then that Aussie did not make them.

As to others not entering into this, well, as an outside observer, watching things unfold here I honestly don't blame anyone for not entering the fray over at PA. To be clear, that is not because of anything that Aussie has specifically done or is doing. I realise that Aussie can have his issues, but he clearly and certainly does not have that market cornered.

I think it quite strange really all the finger pointing at Aussie from members of a forum that had an admin quite premeditated in accessing members accounts. Hell one such person even bragged about making up "posts in another members name" to further abuse said poster. Meanwhile a select few come here to flame. Aussie sure paints a target on himself because of his forthright nature and expressed desire to make the place "better" to post at. I don't always agree with that idea (and Aussie knows this well), firstly his idea of "better" might not be everyone else's and secondly, at the end of the day, Freediver is the head honcho, ultimately what he decides goes.

I have already pointed out as well that your election process is clearly a dud, a pretend play in the sandpit. As long as you lot are happy with that, then knock yourselves out. Of course, when your game spews forth into this forum, well then, that makes it open for comment, hence I am commenting.

I quite honestly cannot conceive of anyway that the current populace of the place could remove any taint of disreputability after allowing an admin to breach the confidentiality and privacy of members. To be even more honest, given the common denominator, this place is probably not all that secure either, that remains to be seen.

All of this childish bitching here doesn't change those facts.

All of this childish bitching here doesn't change the fact that the most recent election (at the very least) was flawed the very moment that bogus accounts were set up and allowed to vote. Sure, some claim that FD did not count the bogus ones. Well, if FD knows who the bogus ones are then it is highly likely that FD can work out who set them up. Further, it would be absolutely no issue to delete said accounts promptly.

None of that happened though, perhaps this game is just far too entertaining...

Very curious the info Aussie put up as well about an alleged PM from the same person who, as admin, boasted he was accessing a members account to post in their name. More mud thrown around?