Australian Politics Forum - Shariah Law and the Constitution

jockohomo3d Full Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 187 Gender:	Re: Shariah Law and the Constitution Reply #15 - Sep 21^st, 2014 at 6:04pm The constitution covers the rights and responsibilities of Australians. Sharia involves the killing of kaffir. If you need any further explanation, perhaps you should euthanise yourself.
Back to top	IP Logged

Brian Ross Gold Member Offline Representative of me Posts: 45961	Re: Shariah Law and the Constitution Reply #16 - Sep 21^st, 2014 at 6:12pm Redmond Neck wrote on Sep 21^st, 2014 at 5:18pm: If they continue to outbreed us which is certain we may have to resort to the Fiji solution. A coup! There is no evidence they will "outbreed" anybody. 2% cannot outbreed 98%. It is a logical fallacy.
Back to top	It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using posting to the general forum now. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk... IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 149628
Gender: male

Re: Shariah Law and the Constitution
Reply #17 - Sep 21^st, 2014 at 6:18pm

Brian Ross wrote on Sep 21^st, 2014 at 6:12pm:

Redmond Neck wrote on Sep 21^st, 2014 at 5:18pm:

If they continue to outbreed us which is certain we may have to resort to the Fiji solution.

A coup!

There is no evidence they will "outbreed" anybody. 2% cannot outbreed 98%. It is a logical fallacy. Roll Eyes

Have you noticed that the level of "stupid" in this forum has risen considerably in the last week or so?

What's going on? Seriously?

It's as though all this talk of terrorism has literally got people scared witless.

"witless: to such an extent that one cannot think clearly or rationally."

Back to top

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles

IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 45961

Re: Shariah Law and the Constitution
Reply #18 - Sep 21^st, 2014 at 6:25pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 21^st, 2014 at 6:18pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Sep 21^st, 2014 at 6:12pm:

Redmond Neck wrote on Sep 21^st, 2014 at 5:18pm:

If they continue to outbreed us which is certain we may have to resort to the Fiji solution.

A coup!

There is no evidence they will "outbreed" anybody. 2% cannot outbreed 98%. It is a logical fallacy. Roll Eyes

Have you noticed that the level of "stupid" in this forum has risen considerably in the last week or so?

What's going on? Seriously?

It's as though all this talk of terrorism has literally got people scared witless.

"witless: to such an extent that one cannot think clearly or rationally."

I agree. Perhaps if Soren, et al. went off to a forum where they'd be more at home with their views, such as Stormfront, we could see the average IQ of both sites raised? Grin

Phobia tends to do that, Greg. It drives people to act irrationally when confronted with it. Roll Eyes

Back to top

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using posting to the general forum now. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

Aussie Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 39659 Gender:	Re: Shariah Law and the Constitution Reply #19 - Sep 21^st, 2014 at 6:27pm I hope someone in the know will post about any conflict.....if there is any. Maybe FD needs to put this in his Muslim Wiki.
Back to top	IP Logged

Datalife

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2405
Gender: male

Re: Shariah Law and the Constitution
Reply #20 - Sep 21^st, 2014 at 6:29pm

Brian Ross wrote on Sep 21^st, 2014 at 6:12pm:

Redmond Neck wrote on Sep 21^st, 2014 at 5:18pm:

If they continue to outbreed us which is certain we may have to resort to the Fiji solution.

A coup!

There is no evidence they will "outbreed" anybody. 2% cannot outbreed 98%. It is a logical fallacy. Roll Eyes

Instead of your say so and rolling eyes, show workings.

Back to top

"If they’re out there in the high seas, what you would do is seek to turn them back through the agency of the Australian Navy".

Kevin Rudd on 2GB, July 12, 2007

IP Logged

Baronvonrort

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20267
Gender: male

Re: Shariah Law and the Constitution
Reply #21 - Sep 21^st, 2014 at 6:58pm

Aussie wrote on Sep 21^st, 2014 at 11:38am:

I know SFA about Shariah Law....and something about the Constitution. Can one of those in the know, let me know if there is any (and if so, what) conflict between the two?

I know about sharia (god's) law as muslims call it and sfa about the consititution, i dont have time to read it and give you an essay so have this for starters.

1.We are a constitutional monarchy with the Queen as head of state, under sharia law they do a caliphate form of dictatorship with the Caliph as the head of state, there is no separation of mosque and state the mosques and dusty old books from the dark ages are where they get their laws.

2.we cannot make any laws for or against religion or the free practice of religion, sharia law outlaws all other gods, the jews and christians have to pay a form of protection money called Jizya to be themselves.
Religious discrimination against non muslim beliefs are allowed under sharia law.

Of course our constitution can be changed by referendum, every time muslims get to vote they vote for the religious nutjobs like Hamas, Hezbollah (party of god), the muslim brotherhood in Egypt.

In Iran which operates under sharia law, Amnesty international have raised numerous human rights concerns.

If you oppose the Islamic regime in Iran you are declared an enemy of God and executed.
If you oppose the Islamic state where they rule you are declared an apostate or infidel and get your head chopped off.

Of course the leftists like defending Islamofacism which is what Islamic rule is.

Back to top

Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it.

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 39659
Gender: male

Re: Shariah Law and the Constitution
Reply #22 - Sep 21^st, 2014 at 6:59pm

Datalife wrote on Sep 21^st, 2014 at 6:29pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Sep 21^st, 2014 at 6:12pm:

Redmond Neck wrote on Sep 21^st, 2014 at 5:18pm:

If they continue to outbreed us which is certain we may have to resort to the Fiji solution.

A coup!

There is no evidence they will "outbreed" anybody. 2% cannot outbreed 98%. It is a logical fallacy. Roll Eyes

Instead of your say so and rolling eyes, show workings.

Well.....the 2011 Census had Muslims at 2.2% of the entire Australian populace. I that enough 'workings?'

*No rolling eyes.*

Back to top

IP Logged

freediver Gold Member Offline www.ozpolitic.com Posts: 52174 At my desk.	Re: Shariah Law and the Constitution Reply #23 - Sep 21^st, 2014 at 7:04pm Seems to be more of a question about the constitution than about Islam Aussie. We can give you a long list of problems with Islam that right-minded people ought object to, but I don't think anyone is going to bother delving into the Australian constitution for you. Serious suggestion: ask Jacqui.
Back to top	People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words. IP Logged

Datalife

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2405
Gender: male

Re: Shariah Law and the Constitution
Reply #24 - Sep 21^st, 2014 at 7:04pm

Aussie wrote on Sep 21^st, 2014 at 6:59pm:

Datalife wrote on Sep 21^st, 2014 at 6:29pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Sep 21^st, 2014 at 6:12pm:

Redmond Neck wrote on Sep 21^st, 2014 at 5:18pm:

If they continue to outbreed us which is certain we may have to resort to the Fiji solution.

A coup!

There is no evidence they will "outbreed" anybody. 2% cannot outbreed 98%. It is a logical fallacy. Roll Eyes

Instead of your say so and rolling eyes, show workings.

Well.....the 2011 Census had Muslims at 2.2% of the entire Australian populace. I that enough 'workings?'

*No rolling eyes.*

Nope. Claim was made and now I would like to see something more than an assertion and a rolling eye.

Back to top

"If they’re out there in the high seas, what you would do is seek to turn them back through the agency of the Australian Navy".

Kevin Rudd on 2GB, July 12, 2007

IP Logged

Baronvonrort

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20267
Gender: male

Re: Shariah Law and the Constitution
Reply #25 - Sep 21^st, 2014 at 7:15pm

Aussie wrote on Sep 21^st, 2014 at 6:59pm:

Datalife wrote on Sep 21^st, 2014 at 6:29pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Sep 21^st, 2014 at 6:12pm:

Redmond Neck wrote on Sep 21^st, 2014 at 5:18pm:

If they continue to outbreed us which is certain we may have to resort to the Fiji solution.

A coup!

There is no evidence they will "outbreed" anybody. 2% cannot outbreed 98%. It is a logical fallacy. Roll Eyes

Instead of your say so and rolling eyes, show workings.

Well.....the 2011 Census had Muslims at 2.2% of the entire Australian populace. I that enough 'workings?'

*No rolling eyes.*

2.2% and KFC does not sell bacon and cheese zingers where most of them live-
Roll Eyes

Did the jews ever ask us to stop eating pork,did the hindu ever ask us to stop eating beef?

Back to top

Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it.

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 39659
Gender: male

Re: Shariah Law and the Constitution
Reply #26 - Sep 21^st, 2014 at 7:16pm

Quote:

1.We are a constitutional monarchy with the Queen as head of state, under sharia law they do a caliphate form of dictatorship with the Caliph as the head of state, there is no separation of mosque and state the mosques and dusty old books from the dark ages are where they get their laws.

Who cares. They can say what they like. The Constitution is dominant in Australia. The fairies at the bottom of my garden can rave on as much as they like. They cannot change the Constitution. Thus, there is no conflict......in fact, there is harmony, and I do not accept for one second what you have said. If you want me to take you seriously, provide a credible link.

Quote:

2.we cannot make any laws for or against religion or the free practice of religion, sharia law outlaws all other gods, the jews and christians have to pay a form of protection money called Jizya to be themselves.
Religious discrimination against non muslim beliefs are allowed under sharia law. [quote]

Gawd help us from idiots. Where does any of that conflict with anything in the Constitution?

[quote]Of course our constitution can be changed by referendum, every time muslims get to vote they vote for the religious nutjobs like Hamas, Hezbollah (party of god), the muslim brotherhood in Egypt.

Really? And when did that happen in any Referendum vote. Don't bother......it never did. Are you related to Goebels?

Quote:

In Iran which operates under sharia law, Amnesty international have raised numerous human rights concerns.

So what. This Thread is not about that. The 'red under the bed' smear tactic will not work with anyone these days.

Quote:

If you oppose the Islamic regime in Iran you are declared an enemy of God and executed.
If you oppose the Islamic state where they rule you are declared an apostate or infidel and get your head chopped off.

Of course the leftists like defending Islamofacism which is what Islamic rule is.

And Jesus wept................

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 39659
Gender: male

Re: Shariah Law and the Constitution
Reply #27 - Sep 21^st, 2014 at 7:26pm

freediver wrote on Sep 21^st, 2014 at 7:04pm:

Seems to be more of a question about the constitution than about Islam Aussie. We can give you a long list of problems with Islam that right-minded people ought object to, but I don't think anyone is going to bother delving into the Australian constitution for you.

Serious suggestion: ask Jacqui.

Serious answer. She is an idiot. I don't care about your personal problems with Islam. (Best advice I can give you is ...... don't bother. 98% [+-] of Australia could not care less.)

I do care about how anything it has is in conflict with our Constitution, and I reckon there is nothing whatsoever in conflict. You are yet to show me anything.

No-one else has yet produced. Not one Poster.

Back to top

IP Logged

freediver Gold Member Offline www.ozpolitic.com Posts: 52174 At my desk.	Re: Shariah Law and the Constitution Reply #28 - Sep 21^st, 2014 at 7:31pm That's because no-one else cares Aussie.
Back to top	People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words. IP Logged

Baronvonrort

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20267
Gender: male

Re: Shariah Law and the Constitution
Reply #29 - Sep 21^st, 2014 at 7:31pm

Aussie wrote on Sep 21^st, 2014 at 7:16pm:

Quote:

1.We are a constitutional monarchy with the Queen as head of state, under sharia law they do a caliphate form of dictatorship with the Caliph as the head of state, there is no separation of mosque and state the mosques and dusty old books from the dark ages are where they get their laws.

Who cares. They can say what they like. The Constitution is dominant in Australia. The fairies at the bottom of my garden can rave on as much as they like. They cannot change the Constitution. Thus, there is no conflict......in fact, there is harmony, and I do not accept for one second what you have said. If you want me to take you seriously, provide a credible link.

Quote:

2.we cannot make any laws for or against religion or the free practice of religion, sharia law outlaws all other gods, the jews and christians have to pay a form of protection money called Jizya to be themselves.
Religious discrimination against non muslim beliefs are allowed under sharia law. [quote]

Gawd help us from idiots. Where does any of that conflict with anything in the Constitution?

[quote]Of course our constitution can be changed by referendum, every time muslims get to vote they vote for the religious nutjobs like Hamas, Hezbollah (party of god), the muslim brotherhood in Egypt.

Really? And when did that happen in any Referendum vote. Don't bother......it never did. Are you related to Goebels?

Quote:

In Iran which operates under sharia law, Amnesty international have raised numerous human rights concerns.

So what. This Thread is not about that. The 'red under the bed' smear tactic will not work with anyone these days.

Quote:

If you oppose the Islamic regime in Iran you are declared an enemy of God and executed.
If you oppose the Islamic state where they rule you are declared an apostate or infidel and get your head chopped off.

Of course the leftists like defending Islamofacism which is what Islamic rule is.

And Jesus wept................

If you want to know what sharia law is look at the Islamic state, the Taliban,Iran,Saudi Arabia.

Non muslim women are forced to wear hijab in those countries

13 countries with Islam as the state religion have the death penalty for atheists, how does that compare to our constitution?

Back to top

Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it.

IP Logged