"terrorism is in the modern world virtually entirely Islamic".

Stilll can't substantiate your claim, Longy?

Admit you lied.

DaS Energy wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2014 at 10:20am:



Yes but as we have seen in Bali they don't need to come to Australia to attack Australians...

brumbie wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2014 at 10:44am:


They don't need to come Australia to murder anyone, nor where they selective of religious believers!

The 2002 Bali bombings occurred on 12 October 2002
in the tourist district of Kuta on the Indonesian island of Bali.

The attack killed 202 people (including 88 Australians, 38 Indonesians, 27 Britons, 7 Americans, 6 Swedish citizens and 3 Danish citizens)..


The 2005 Bail bombing. Among those killed are 15 Indonesians, 4 Australians,
and a Japanese national, not counting the 3 suicide bombers.

Its time wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2014 at 11:15am:


When one thinks of mass murder, Hitler comes to mind. If not Hitler, then Tojo, Stalin, or Mao. Credit is given to the 20th-century totalitarians as the worst species of tyranny to have ever arisen. However, the alarming truth is that Islam has killed more than any of these, and may surpass all of them combined in numbers and cruelty.

The enormity of the slaughters of the "religion of peace" are so far beyond comprehension that even honest historians overlook the scale. When one looks beyond our myopic focus, Islam is the greatest killing machine in the history of mankind, bar none.

    The Islamic conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. -- Will Durant, as quoted on Daniel Pipes site.

Conservative estimates place the number at 80 million dead Indians.

    According to some calculations, the Indian (subcontinent) population decreased by 80 million between 1000 (conquest of Afghanistan) and 1525 (end of Delhi Sultanate). -- Koenrad Elst as quoted on Daniel Pipes site

80 Million?! The conquistadors' crimes pale into insignificance at that number. No wonder Hitler admired Islam as a fighting religion. He stood in awe of Islam, whose butchery even he did not surpass.

Over 110 Million Blacks were killed by Islam.

    ... a minumum of 28 Million African were enslaved in the Muslim Middle East.  Since, at least, 80 percent of those captured by Muslim slave traders were calculated to have died before reaching the slave market, it is believed that the death toll from 1400 years of Arab and Muslim slave raids into Africa could have been as high as 112 Millions.  When added to the number of those sold in the slave markets, the total number of African victims of the trans-Saharan and East African slave trade could be significantly higher than 140 Million people. -- John Allembillah Azumah, author of The Legacy of Arab-Islam in Africa: A Quest for Inter-religious Dialogue

Add just those two numbers alone together, and Islam has surpassed the victims of 20th-century totalitarianism. However, it does not end there. Add the millions who died at the hand of Muslims in the Sudan in our lifetime.

Much of Islamic slavery was sexual in nature, with a preference for women. Those men who were captured were castrated. The mulatto children of the women were often killed, which explains why Islam was not demographically shifted towards the black race, unlike slaves in the West, who bore children to breed a mestizo class. Add in those dead children; and we arrive at well over 200 million.

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2014/05/the_greatest_murder_machine_in_history.ht...

John Smith wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2014 at 8:16am:


well u didnt admit what you drive so kinda proves my point just the same although why you care what I drive is beyond me.

Datalife wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2014 at 11:11am:


hoddle street was not terrorism.  it was mass murder but a single individual.  But I can see the next phase of this debate where the loons define terrorism as any bit of violence that might have upset ie caused terror in someone.  nothing like diluting the meaning of the word to destroy any rational debate.

longweekend58 wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2014 at 11:52am:



If you must know what I drive I have both a toyota Prado and a toyota Hilux .


I'm surprised to hear that you both had a point and think I cared 
I just found it hillarious that anyone who drives a glorified ford falcon can gloat about their car ......