Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
The Project Will Set Melbourne Back For Years (Read 428 times)
imcrookonit
Ex Member
*



The Project Will Set Melbourne Back For Years
Sep 9th, 2014 at 7:38am
 
CityLink founder warns 'wrong way, go back' on East West Link

Date
    September 9, 2014


CityLink engineer Alan Hale says public transport is the answer to Melbourne's traffic congestion.      Huh

It was the turn of the 1990s, Victoria's economy was as lank as Kurt Cobain's hair and civil engineers were scratching around for work.

Alan Hale and his colleagues at Acer Wargon Chapman used their ample downtime to draw up plans for a toll road and tunnel beneath the Yarra that would cure Melbourne's chronic north-south traffic woes.

Interviewed by The Age in August 1991, Mr Hale spruiked the benefits of the proposed road, which would later become CityLink, declaring it would create thousands of jobs and remedy the congestion that had turned King Street and Swanston Street into veritable car parks.

Now retired, Mr Hale still believes CityLink changed Melbourne for the better and helped revive the CBD. But he holds startlingly different views about the value of Melbourne's current mega road project, the East West Link.      Sad

Mr Hale says the 5.2-kilometre toll road is "the wrong priority and will not alleviate congestion across the city" and that the Napthine government is set to sign on to a project that will set Melbourne back for years.      Sad

"The evidence from cities around the world where real renewal has been achieved is that public transport should be the primary focus, not just more and more roads," he says.

"For those of us who have been involved in major transport projects long enough, the lessons learnt, often the hard way, are that building more roads without investing in public transport is simply a recipe for inducing more vehicular travel."

CityLink was followed by the construction of EastLink, then Peninsula Link, as Victoria continued to build new roads instead of rail lines. Mr Hale argues it is time Melbourne followed other smart cities around the globe and redressed the imbalance.

The former roads engineer's road to Damascus moment came while working with a company that had built a tram network for the French city of Strasbourg, which turned the CBD into a pedestrian haven by redirecting vehicle traffic to a new outer ring road.

Mr Hale, no public transport purist, argues completing the "missing link" in the ring road between Greensborough and the Eastern Freeway would similarly "make a lot of sense" because, unlike the East West Link, it would divert traffic away from the inner suburbs.

The Napthine government is on course to sign contracts within weeks for stage one of the East West Link, a $6 billion to $8 billion connection between the end of the Eastern Freeway in Collingwood and CityLink in Flemington.

A recent traffic study commissioned by the government found it could save motorists an hour a day in travel time compared with driving along congested above-ground roads.

Napthine government spokeswoman Larissa Garvin defended the government's record, arguing that "more than half of the government's $24 billion infrastructure program is being spent on public transport".

"But public transport alone can't get your groceries to your supermarket, can't get tradies to their sites, can't get mums to the places they need to be each day, and it certainly can't get big trucks off local roads," Ms Garvin said. "The reality is that both rail and roads are needed, and we are doing both."

Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/citylink-founder-warns-wrong-way-go-back-on-east-west-link-20140908-10dxcb.html#ixzz3ClJ3YBY8
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bam
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21905
Gender: male
Re: The Project Will Set Melbourne Back For Years
Reply #1 - Sep 9th, 2014 at 10:08am
 
Quote:
"The evidence from cities around the world where real renewal has been achieved is that public transport should be the primary focus, not just more and more roads," he says.

"For those of us who have been involved in major transport projects long enough, the lessons learnt, often the hard way, are that building more roads without investing in public transport is simply a recipe for inducing more vehicular travel."

Studies have shown that there is a tendency in cities around the world for trips on public transport and by car to take similar lengths of time. If public transport is made faster and more efficient, more people will use it, and that reduces the number of cars on the road and so reduces journey times.

It's why it's a bad idea to invest only in one while neglecting the other. And it's why the Federal Liberals' refusing to fund any urban rail projects will not fix traffic congestion.

Outer suburbs are car hell because too little has been spent on public transport during the last 50 years. That needs to change.
Back to top
 

You are not entitled to your opinion. You are only entitled to hold opinions that you can defend through sound, reasoned argument.
 
IP Logged
 
imcrookonit
Ex Member
*



Re: The Project Will Set Melbourne Back For Years
Reply #2 - Sep 9th, 2014 at 5:55pm
 
Symbolic step for East West Link but Napthine keeps his distance

Date
    September 9, 2014


News that a "preferred bidder" has been selected to build the first half of the Napthine government's signature East West Link might appear an incremental step. So incremental that Premier Denis Napthine was on Tuesday nowhere near the announcement.      Sad

There is still so much that we don't know about this massive project, including the final cost, the final design, the final number of properties to be acquired or how much motorists will be charged to use the road.      Sad

As Treasurer Michael O'Brien points out there is "still much to be done" before contracts are signed, including resolving a number of thorny planning issues, including determining whether additional properties should be purchased.


The only thing that has now changed with the announcement is that government will now negotiate with a single consortium, where previously there were two bidders in the mix. Nothing is locked in, and if things don't go well, other consortia can still be brought back to the table.

Incremental though it may be, the latest announcement is symbolically important.

Above all, it highlights the Coalition's determination to lock the project down before the November 29 election, even though the politics associated with the road are far from clear.      Sad

Poll after poll has shown voters rate other transport projects as higher priorities, particularly construction of a new rail tunnel to boost capacity across the network and level crossing upgrades. The old adage that roads provide bigger political gains than other transport projects no longer seems to hold.

On Tuesday, Denis Napthine kept his distance, instead announcing $12 million to upgrade facilities at Cranbourne Secondary College.

Less than three months from an election, the idea that the Premier would miss an opportunity to spruik the biggest infrastructure project in Victoria's history is curious, to say the least.

The Abbott government, which is chipping in $3 billion for both sections of the link, was also notably absent.

Despite heading on a joint press release with O'Brien to make the announcement, Federal Assistant Minister for Infrastructure Jamie Briggs did not participate in a press conference, as is common practice with joint announcements.

The jury is still out, but right now the project isn't the political winner the Coalition might have earlier predicted.

But it may yet also lead to a headache for Labor. If Dan Andrews wins, he will face a difficult choice: spend up big on a project he has spent months telling us is a dud which it will never be able to "own" politically, or find a way of wriggling out of a legal contract. This would inevitably dent Labor's credibility, both in the eyes of voters and the business community.

Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/symbolic-step-for-east-west-link-but-napthine-keeps-his-distance-20140909-10edez.html#ixzz3Cnpbpnrz
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
imcrookonit
Ex Member
*



Re: The Project Will Set Melbourne Back For Years
Reply #3 - Sep 10th, 2014 at 2:20pm
 
Brunswick resident Anthony Murphy may appeal Supreme Court decision in favour of East West Link

Date
    September 10, 2014 


A Brunswick resident has lost his legal challenge to the East West Link, but is expected to appeal the decision in the next week.      Huh

Lawyers for Brunswick resident Anthony Murphy had argued the court should grant an injunction preventing the state government from building the $6 billion to $8 billion East West Link. They said the state and its Linking Melbourne Authority had made "misleading representations" about the toll road's estimated cost benefits and traffic forecasts, thereby breaching consumer protection laws.      

A key issue in the case was whether the government's preparations for the road were akin to carrying on a business.

Justice Clyde Croft dismissed the case on Wednesday, ruling that the state was not carrying on a business and that it had not made representations in trade or commerce.


The judge said the government had prepared a short form business case on the East West Link to attract federal funding from Infrastructure Australia, rather than to conduct a business. Media releases published last year about the project were "entirely consonant with the ordinary functions of government...and devoid of any business or trading character," he said.

Other government documents, including a comprehensive impact statement and transport summary report were published to comply with the state's legal obligations, rather than in a commercial context.

The state government has promised the court it will not sign the contracts for the East West Link until September 16.

Mr Murphy said outside court he would "almost certainly be lodging an appeal" to the court's decision before then.

"We're not worried about the cost because it's in the public interest we're taking this fight and it should be seen as part of the democratic process for a community group to take legal action against the government...citizens have the right to challenge the government, in court if necessary," he said.

Residents Against the Tunnel's spokeswoman Harriet Mantell, said: "It's disappointing that any independent scrutiny of the government's reasoning for the project hasn't happened yet. It's wrong that a government can hide behind secrecy and yet submit Victorian taxpayers to potentially massive debt and yet we're not allowed to know the reasons for that debt".      Sad

Justice Croft also said that the injunction Mr Murphy had sought was too broad, because it attempted to restrain the government from entering into contracts with third parties. This, he said, was "entirely different" from preventing the government from making future alleged misrepresentations about the East West Link.

Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/brunswick-resident-anthony-murphy-may-appeal-supreme-court-decision-in-favour-of-east-west-link-20140910-10etm3.html#ixzz3CsnK7mEd
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print