Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print
Government reported to favour Japanese submarines (Read 3589 times)
Armchair_Politician
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 30305
Gender: male
Re: Government reported to favour Japanese submarines
Reply #30 - Sep 8th, 2014 at 7:20pm
 
Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 8th, 2014 at 2:11pm:
Grappler Racist Filth wrote on Sep 8th, 2014 at 2:05pm:
Vic wrote on Sep 8th, 2014 at 9:44am:
Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 8th, 2014 at 9:13am:
Vic wrote on Sep 8th, 2014 at 8:23am:
It will be interestin  to see if the US of A will allow their fire control and weapons systems to be installed in these


If we installed that then why not? The Japs won't be using our subs if they build them, we will be using them.


The americans are very tight about giving their technology away.  It took a lot of negoitation and rigour to get the AEGIS on the Spanish design AWD.    Same as the Fire Control and Torpedo on the Collins, they are very protective of their IP


Usually they offer the second string stuff first - you need to get right in their pockets to get the good oil.

Export F-16s do not possess the US fire control and management systems and are inferior in air-to-air against US F-16s.

You can't expect them to give away everything..... ya gotta retain an edge....



Hence why we had no chance of getting F-22s


They've refused to export those to ANYONE, not just us.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Armchair_Politician
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 30305
Gender: male
Re: Government reported to favour Japanese submarines
Reply #31 - Sep 8th, 2014 at 7:21pm
 
St George of the Garden wrote on Sep 8th, 2014 at 3:20pm:
A govt with balls (i.e. not an Abbott led one) would start negotiating to buy the Russian planes. Bet the yanks would be willing to sell us the raptors then!


What you meant to say was: "A govt with rocks in its head (i.e. not an Abbott led one) would start negotiating to buy the Russian planes. Bet the yanks would be willing to sell us the raptors then. NOT!"
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Its time
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Boot libs out

Posts: 25639
Gender: female
Re: Government reported to favour Japanese submarines
Reply #32 - Sep 8th, 2014 at 9:13pm
 
The F22 is a piece of crap , as is the F35, the sukhoi and F35 went head to head in simulated war games in 2012 and the F35 lost 2/3rds of the entire fleet in less than 6 hours to the sukhoi,, worst taxpayer purchase ever, not just Abbott but Rudds commitment to the piece of crap. Oh the Americans actually now own 4 sukhois.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
gone
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 744
somewhere
Gender: male
Re: Government reported to favour Japanese submarines
Reply #33 - Sep 8th, 2014 at 9:13pm
 
BigOl64 wrote on Sep 8th, 2014 at 6:23pm:
gone wrote on Sep 8th, 2014 at 5:08pm:
100% waste of money. Another good reason to stop paying taxes.




Protecting the sovereignty of ones country is 100% waste of money, good one  Grin Grin Grin Grin



Australia, a sovereign country?  Grin Grin Grin You must be living in gaga-land. 
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
St George of the Garden
Gold Member
*****
Offline


http://tinyurl.com/n
3o8m2x

Posts: 9809
Gender: male
Re: Government reported to favour Japanese submarines
Reply #34 - Sep 8th, 2014 at 10:13pm
 
Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 8th, 2014 at 7:21pm:
St George of the Garden wrote on Sep 8th, 2014 at 3:20pm:
A govt with balls (i.e. not an Abbott led one) would start negotiating to buy the Russian planes. Bet the yanks would be willing to sell us the raptors then!


What you meant to say was: "A govt with rocks in its head (i.e. not an Abbott led one) would start negotiating to buy the Russian planes. Bet the yanks would be willing to sell us the raptors then. NOT!"

So you didn’t get my point, no problem.

However, we do currently have a govt with rocks in its head, so maybe they will try?  Grin
Back to top
 

I want Muso as GMod. Bring back Muso!
WWW Friends of the National Broadband Network  
IP Logged
 
Taipan
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1091
SouthWest Sydney
Gender: male
Re: Government reported to favour Japanese submarines
Reply #35 - Sep 8th, 2014 at 11:18pm
 
Wasn't it howard who left a whole in our defences when he allowed the Perth class destroyers to be decommissioned without replacements?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Vic
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 8746
Melbourne Victoria
Gender: male
Re: Government reported to favour Japanese submarines
Reply #36 - Sep 9th, 2014 at 6:18am
 
King FriYAY II wrote on Sep 8th, 2014 at 4:51pm:
Grappler Racist Filth wrote on Sep 8th, 2014 at 3:33pm:
King FriYAY II wrote on Sep 8th, 2014 at 3:27pm:
Range has been a major factor against the design — the Soryu has a range of about 11,000 km at 12 km/hr compared with 22,000 km at 19 km/hr for the Collins Class

That is why as far back as I think 1954 – there has been nuclear powered subs.

All our new subs should be nuclear powered.



Hmm - yes.. the pumps etc in the cooling systems are comparatively noisy, compared to electric.... do we want attack subs or boomers armed with missiles?  Depends on your defensive posture.....

Notwithstanding, I am wary of submarines designed by an potential future foe... don't laugh... it's a scenario that Japan will again be a foe in the Pacific in the ongoing saga of The Second Hundred Year's War, same as India.... you may think that odd... there are many factors involved.


Collins class are electric! I Thought they were diesel... Undecided



They are both.  Underwater, the boat runs on batteries that are rated at 8000A/H (I believe they have been upgraded).  Whilst underwater, the boat can raise a snort induction mast to allow air into the engine room, and run the diesels whilst underwater to charge the batteries.  This can have an interesting effect on your eardrums if for some reason the boat dives and the boat becomes a vacuum!  On the surface, the diesels run and either charge the battery and provide power to propulsion, or the battery "floats" across the busbars (neither charging nor discharging) and the diesel power goes directly to propulsion.

Back to top
 

“Fantastic. Great move. Well done Angus”
 
IP Logged
 
Armchair_Politician
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 30305
Gender: male
Re: Government reported to favour Japanese submarines
Reply #37 - Sep 9th, 2014 at 6:37am
 
King FriYAY II wrote on Sep 8th, 2014 at 3:29pm:
Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 8th, 2014 at 9:15am:
My wife's uncle was an instructor on the Collins and he said while they have been unreliable and suffered problems, they're one of the deadliest and quietest subs in the world on a good day. They're much quieter than the American or British nuclear subs. However, those good days are few and far between, he said.


Really?

I thought one of the bad things from day 1 was the noisy diesel powered Collins?


You cannot operate Diesel engines when submerged. The diesels are turned on when surfaced or when "snorkelling", with a mast sticking up out of the ocean above the submerged sub to let out exhaust gases. Otherwise, the diesels are used to charge a bunch of big batteries that are used to power the sub when submerged. This is the advantage of nuclear subs over diesels - nuclear subs don't need to recharge the batteries but diesels do. However, diesels are much quieter when submerged because they don't have high pressure pipes full of water cooling the reactor & that's what makes a nuclear sub a bit noisier than a diesel sub. Our diesels will detect a nuclear sub before the nuclear sub can detect us nine times out of ten because of this. I hope this makes sense. Smiley
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Armchair_Politician
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 30305
Gender: male
Re: Government reported to favour Japanese submarines
Reply #38 - Sep 9th, 2014 at 6:39am
 
Taipan wrote on Sep 8th, 2014 at 11:18pm:
Wasn't it howard who left a whole in our defences when he allowed the Perth class destroyers to be decommissioned without replacements?


No, they were well and truly obsolete and couldn't have done much good.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
BigOl64
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 14438
Townsville QLD
Gender: male
Re: Government reported to favour Japanese submarines
Reply #39 - Sep 9th, 2014 at 8:53am
 
gone wrote on Sep 8th, 2014 at 9:13pm:
BigOl64 wrote on Sep 8th, 2014 at 6:23pm:
gone wrote on Sep 8th, 2014 at 5:08pm:
100% waste of money. Another good reason to stop paying taxes.




Protecting the sovereignty of ones country is 100% waste of money, good one  Grin Grin Grin Grin



Australia, a sovereign country?  Grin Grin Grin You must be living in gaga-land. 




Please do not reply, it makes everyone a little more stupid for having read your comment. Now off to the kiddies table with you, the adults want to talk







Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
BigOl64
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 14438
Townsville QLD
Gender: male
Re: Government reported to favour Japanese submarines
Reply #40 - Sep 9th, 2014 at 9:01am
 
Its time wrote on Sep 8th, 2014 at 9:13pm:
The F22 is a piece of crap , as is the F35, the sukhoi and F35 went head to head in simulated war games in 2012 and the F35 lost 2/3rds of the entire fleet in less than 6 hours to the sukhoi,, worst taxpayer purchase ever, not just Abbott but Rudds commitment to the piece of crap. Oh the Americans actually now own 4 sukhois.



You didn't actually read the report, did you, yeah neither di the 4 corners reporter, well they didn't fully disclose the report, they are pretty clueless on these matters. 

But to help you understand a paper exersice and how usless it may be, here is a couple of things to consider.

Maintainablity and aircraft availability (no point having the best aicraft if you can't keep them in the air)

Force multiplication of supporting assets (who can you see and can they see you, can they gather more information than you and how do they use it to their advantage)

Tactics and training ( Who has the best pilots and tactics)


None of these are ever considered by the retard or 4 corners.


BTW, the report identified force projection capability as the main issue not the aircraft capability, not that it matters to you or the cretins at the abc.




Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
imcrookonit
Ex Member
*



Re: Government reported to favour Japanese submarines
Reply #41 - Sep 9th, 2014 at 9:17am
 
End uncertainty over subs, says business, unions

Date
    September 9, 2014


  

Prime Minister Tony Abbott has indicated the government may break a pre-election promise to build 12 submarines in Adelaide instead sending the work to Japan.


Business is calling on the federal government to end the uncertainty over where Australia's next fleet of submarines will be built and declare a decision "as soon as possible".

It comes as the government sends out more signals that it is prepared to break its election promise to build 12 new submarines in Adelaide and potentially buy new vessels from Japan.      Sad

Australian Industry Group chief executive Innes Willox said local supply chain companies had made investment decisions on expectations the submarines would be built in Adelaide and needed clarity.

"Companies have acted in good faith here and there's been a long held belief and signals from governments of both sides that submarines would be built in Australia," he told ABC Radio on Tuesday.

"Industry would be looking for guidance as soon as possible."

Australian Manufacturing Workers Union national president Paul Bastian said on Tuesday that building the submarines in Japan would cause a ripple effect for industry.

"I think there will be thousands of jobs in the ship building sector that will be put at risk," he told ABC Radio.      Sad

On Monday, Prime Minister Tony Abbott have his clearest indication yet that the submarines would not be built in Adelaide, telling reporters in Canberra that value for taxpayers must outweigh job creation, angering the South Australian government.

Industry Minister Ian Macfarlane said on Tuesday that while no decision had yet been made he confirmed the government would prioritise "value for money".

He said a decision would be made on the advice of the Defence Department and when Defence Minister David Johnston brought the issue to the National Security Committee.

"We haven't made a decision yet on where the submarines will be built," he todl ABC radio and said he would not engage in speculation when asked if the new conditions were paving the way for another broken promise from the government.

"We're going to look at the options, you're assuming South Australia won't get the contract, I'm not assuming that," he said.

But Labor leader Bill Shorten said: "Tony Abbott and David Johnston have looked South Australians in the eye and lied to their faces."      Sad

Mr Shorten will visit ASC (formerly known as the Australian Submarine Corporation) in Adelaide on Tuesday.

He has warned that buying submarines from overseas will "devastate South Australia and could irresponsibly put our national security at risk as a maritime nation".

South Australian Premier Jay Wetherill said any decision outsource the building of the submarines would hit Victoria and Western Australia.

Independent South Australian Senator Nick Xenophon on Tuesday slammed the possible move as sending taxpayer funds to create jobs overseas.      Sad

"This would have a national impact on our skills and our ability to manufacture," he told ABC local radio in Melbourne.

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/end-uncertainty-over-subs-says-business-unions-20140909-10e6xb.html#ixzz3Cliv66D3
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
King FriYAY II
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2109
Re: Government reported to favour Japanese submarines
Reply #42 - Sep 9th, 2014 at 10:42am
 
Vic wrote on Sep 9th, 2014 at 6:18am:
King FriYAY II wrote on Sep 8th, 2014 at 4:51pm:
Grappler Racist Filth wrote on Sep 8th, 2014 at 3:33pm:
King FriYAY II wrote on Sep 8th, 2014 at 3:27pm:
Range has been a major factor against the design — the Soryu has a range of about 11,000 km at 12 km/hr compared with 22,000 km at 19 km/hr for the Collins Class

That is why as far back as I think 1954 – there has been nuclear powered subs.

All our new subs should be nuclear powered.



Hmm - yes.. the pumps etc in the cooling systems are comparatively noisy, compared to electric.... do we want attack subs or boomers armed with missiles?  Depends on your defensive posture.....

Notwithstanding, I am wary of submarines designed by an potential future foe... don't laugh... it's a scenario that Japan will again be a foe in the Pacific in the ongoing saga of The Second Hundred Year's War, same as India.... you may think that odd... there are many factors involved.


Collins class are electric! I Thought they were diesel... Undecided



They are both.  Underwater, the boat runs on batteries that are rated at 8000A/H (I believe they have been upgraded).  Whilst underwater, the boat can raise a snort induction mast to allow air into the engine room, and run the diesels whilst underwater to charge the batteries.  This can have an interesting effect on your eardrums if for some reason the boat dives and the boat becomes a vacuum!  On the surface, the diesels run and either charge the battery and provide power to propulsion, or the battery "floats" across the busbars (neither charging nor discharging) and the diesel power goes directly to propulsion.



Ah ha, thanks
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
King FriYAY II
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2109
Re: Government reported to favour Japanese submarines
Reply #43 - Sep 9th, 2014 at 10:43am
 
Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 9th, 2014 at 6:37am:
King FriYAY II wrote on Sep 8th, 2014 at 3:29pm:
Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 8th, 2014 at 9:15am:
My wife's uncle was an instructor on the Collins and he said while they have been unreliable and suffered problems, they're one of the deadliest and quietest subs in the world on a good day. They're much quieter than the American or British nuclear subs. However, those good days are few and far between, he said.


Really?

I thought one of the bad things from day 1 was the noisy diesel powered Collins?


You cannot operate Diesel engines when submerged. The diesels are turned on when surfaced or when "snorkelling", with a mast sticking up out of the ocean above the submerged sub to let out exhaust gases. Otherwise, the diesels are used to charge a bunch of big batteries that are used to power the sub when submerged. This is the advantage of nuclear subs over diesels - nuclear subs don't need to recharge the batteries but diesels do. However, diesels are much quieter when submerged because they don't have high pressure pipes full of water cooling the reactor & that's what makes a nuclear sub a bit noisier than a diesel sub. Our diesels will detect a nuclear sub before the nuclear sub can detect us nine times out of ten because of this. I hope this makes sense. Smiley


Cool, cheers..
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Grappler Racist Filth
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 90958
Proud Old White Australian Man
Gender: male
Re: Government reported to favour Japanese submarines
Reply #44 - Sep 9th, 2014 at 11:09am
 
Well - you can - but they'll suck all the air out in no time flat.. but only using the oxygen in it..... (gasps)
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print