Brian Ross wrote on Jul 12^th, 2014 at 8:08pm:


Oh, for heaven's sake!

Say I agree with you and say that it's awful that people can't get along with each because they're bigoted and extremist in their attitudes.

Because in your world they shouldn't. Violence is only a 'social construct' that serves no purpose.

What do you propose to do to prevent violence between all the bigoted groups of extremists with opposing attitudes?

I mean RIGHT NOW!

You've all the answers, haven't you?

(without violent means, of course)



The world will be a better place in .....

Mattywisk wrote on Jul 12^th, 2014 at 8:25pm:


"correlation does not denote causation", Matty.   

Brian Ross wrote on Jul 12^th, 2014 at 9:33pm:


Yes, that’s what they taught the old boy at the prestigious University of Balogney.

The tinted races, you see, are genetically inferior by virtue of their correlation - a statistical aberration relating to their cultural backwardness, subnormal intelligence, sexual inversion, criminal deviance, psycho-pathology, etc, etc, etc. There’s a formula somewhere - the old boy should know it.

They didn’t write the Bible, invent the steam engine, or come up with one Shakespeare, Wordsworth or Coleridge in 1400 years. All they did was sit around eating figs and sodomizing each other while we did all the work.

And now that we’ve made something of ourselves, they want to invade us, bring us down to their level and spoil our fun.

They’re just a bunch of dirty rotters, the lot of them. Statistically speaking. It’s their fault, of course. They only have themselves to blame.

The old boy’s studied all this. Ask him for a list of references - he should be able to point you in the right direction.

Yes, Matty, but do you mean sad in a causative sense, or something entirely different?

Try to be specific.

Brian Ross wrote on Jul 12^th, 2014 at 8:08pm:



What makes Muslims commit blood curdling savagery in the name of Islam, or what makes blacks disproportionately more criminal than others?

Their cultures.

Does their tintedness lead to their inferior cultures? WHo cares. They have inferior cultures. Any white who adapts the Bludgahadeen culture or the gangsta culture automatically degrade themselves.

Equally, Arabs or blacks can adapt Western civilisation and be greatly improved individuals because of that.


Western civilisation is created by whites but it is a universal culture, open to all, benefiting all who embrace it.

Most tinted people know this and but some resent it and so stick with the inferior culture of their race -and that is the real racism, sticking with the blood and the soil.

Post-colonial Africa is a living example of this, if you needed an example.
.

Soren wrote on Jul 13^th, 2014 at 7:16pm:


Funny and there I was talking about "race", not "culture", Soren.

Moving the goalposts again? 

When black people are discussed by racists, it is invariably all about the issue of "race".

Which black culture are you talking about?  Black African?  West, East, sub-Saharan or Southern African cultures (to be fairly broad).  What about West Indian?  Which bit of the West Indies, the culture of Jamaica is substantially different to the culture say, of my ancestral homeland, St.Kitts.  Then we have South American black culture and North American black culture - which one are we discussing?  Then you have Southern Indian black culture.   Are they all identical, Soren?

No, you're not racist, are you?   

Quote:


Racists do.  Ask a racist what they consider the cause of the violence of Black people and they'll tell you it's because of their "race" - the colour of their skin essentially.  You claim not to care but in reality you're talking quite a racist talk there, Soren.

Quote:


According to whom?  How do you measure "culture", Soren to determine whether one is inferior or another superior?  Is it how pale the skin of the practitioners is?   

Quote:


Do they?  According to whom?  You?  You're hardly objective on the issue, now are you, Soren?   

Quote:


Will they be accepted though, by the likes of you?  I really wonder...   

Quote:


Is it?  If you the comments of say, Herbie for long enough, it doesn't matter what culture a person practices as compared to what the colour of that person's skin is...   

Quote:


Again, how do you measure culture, Soren?  Is there an internationally recognised standard so we can determine how inferior or superior a given culture is?   

When I was a teenager, I saw those snow monkeys in Japan having a relax in their Japanese hot pools.

Every now and then a fight would break out between those in the pools against certain other snow monkeys, who'd been braving the chill conditions near the pools, sitting huddled to keep warm and had attempted to take a dip in the hot water.

I was told that dominant monkeys, would only tolerate their own, same status, individuals and their offspring in the bath.

It made me mad and I imagined myself rounding up those dominant monkeys and putting them in a cage so the 'lesser' individuals could have a hot water relax too.

Leaving Darwin aside, I thought that'd be the fair and right thing to do.

Course, it soon occurred to me that, if it were true that dominant monkeys run the baths, then once the 'lesser' monkeys got control of the pools, soon enough dominant monkeys in the lesser tribe would be tossing out the lesser-lesser monkeys...

The whole exercise of my bringing justice to snow monkeys would have been subverted by Darwinian instinct and, therefore, pointless.

I remember thinking later, thank god humans don't act like monkeys.