Bam wrote on Jul 4
th, 2014 at 4:53pm:
John Smith wrote on Jul 4
th, 2014 at 4:14pm:
Grendel wrote on Jul 4
th, 2014 at 3:47pm:
Happy for you to be in denial of the real FACTS... trollboy.
But I don't feel inclined to repeat them all over again just for you.

Here you go...
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=4376It'll save a lot of time and effort that'd be wasted on the likes of you.
And...
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/ber-panning-dumped-in-dead-of-n...So considering you ignored the opinions of those with direct interest in the program;teachers, principals and parents... not to mention the children... you seem to also ignore the fact that many schools did not want or need COLAs yet got them and the big plaque with labor members names engraved in gold for all the world to see... A couple of complaints that immediately spring to mind was the school with temporary classrooms that wanted permanent structures. The school that desperately needed a library but got a COLA instead and the school that needed a new toilet block but also got a COLA. These were just a few of the many complaints in NSW... they were ignored in the Orgill report because they didn't fit the criteria... they may well have been in the end value for money... but they were not what was needed. I guess Labor didn't want their names attached to a loo block eh.
wow, you link an unsupported claim by someone claiming to be the shadow minister on a public forum as evidence?
More to the point ... a link from a place that is a "forum" on a website devoted to "online opinion". How trustworthy can that be?
As for The Australian, that's neither a neutral nor unbiased source.
Let me educate you a bit.
Since Leftards always claim uncorroborated evidence must have a link or some such "proof" one does so as best one can... For example years of evidence on talkback radio virtually disappears into the ether. Hard to link to that. Physical evidence or acts witnessed by yourself usually don't have links either. Oh that's just your opinion.
When in fact it actually happened or exists...
So...
Quote:More to the point ... a link from a place that is a "forum" on a website devoted to "online opinion". How trustworthy can that be?
I guess then anything you write or others write here I should ignore as untrustworthy. Yet I trust much of what you write except the personal crap and bias.
Quote:As for The Australian, that's neither a neutral nor unbiased source.
All "biased" sources can be checked. You lot dismiss such things and opinions from people you deem biased or from the other side or for some reason hate. I on the other hand read everyone from all sides and check the facts and figures. It's not rocket science.