Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 12 13 14 15 
Send Topic Print
Wealth inequality: NEVER judge a man by his wealth (Read 16079 times)
vikaryan
Senior Member
****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 453
Gender: male
Re: Wealth inequality: NEVER judge a man by his wealth
Reply #195 - Jul 6th, 2014 at 1:19pm
 
Crony capitalism costs American jobs, money


End the Export-Import Bank and Other Forms of 'Crapitalism'

http://www.thespectrum.com/story/opinion/columnists/2014/07/04/crony-capitalism-costs-american-jobs-money/12235263/
Back to top
 

52151901.jpg (82 KB | 27 )
52151901.jpg

We fight a holy war against the fat and the corrupt and the sinful and the unbelieving!
 
IP Logged
 
vikaryan
Senior Member
****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 453
Gender: male
Re: Wealth inequality: NEVER judge a man by his wealth
Reply #196 - Jul 6th, 2014 at 1:19pm
 
Few Americans would be surprised to learn that a government agency that hands out generous loans and credit guarantees to a select number of corporations is corrupt and poorly managed. This impression has been repeatedly affirmed by the Export-Import Bank’s inspector general. The bank has a long history of dealing with dodgy firms and doling out suspiciously large amounts of loans to certain companies.

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/381167/ex-im-bank-crony-capitalism-action-editors
Back to top
 

52151865.jpg (80 KB | 27 )
52151865.jpg

We fight a holy war against the fat and the corrupt and the sinful and the unbelieving!
 
IP Logged
 
vikaryan
Senior Member
****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 453
Gender: male
Re: Wealth inequality: NEVER judge a man by his wealth
Reply #197 - Jul 6th, 2014 at 2:22pm
 
A corporation is a "fake" or illusionary person.


Free speech? Freedom of religion? What cherished human right will our Supreme Court bestow upon corporations next? The right to bear arms?

Contrary to the court's perversely broad definition of humanity, a corporation is not actually a person. It is a thing that a person (sometimes a very bad person) hides behind.

It is an edifice. It is a fiction. It is a legal charter that too often absolves antisocial leaders of personal responsibility when they lay people off, cheat customers, pollute the environment and otherwise swindle, defraud, manipulate, maim and kill.

http://online.wsj.com/articles/al-lewis-questions-the-hobby-lobby-ruling-1404606315
Back to top
 

corporatio.jpg (57 KB | 33 )
corporatio.jpg

We fight a holy war against the fat and the corrupt and the sinful and the unbelieving!
 
IP Logged
 
vikaryan
Senior Member
****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 453
Gender: male
Re: Wealth inequality: NEVER judge a man by his wealth
Reply #198 - Jul 6th, 2014 at 3:06pm
 
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/06/the-pitchforks-are-coming-for-us-plutocrats-108014.html
Back to top
 

We fight a holy war against the fat and the corrupt and the sinful and the unbelieving!
 
IP Logged
 
vikaryan
Senior Member
****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 453
Gender: male
Re: Wealth inequality: NEVER judge a man by his wealth
Reply #199 - Jul 6th, 2014 at 6:35pm
 
Clinton Global Initiative For Rigged Corporate Trade


NAFTA promoters in the ’90s promised increased U.S. exports and jobs, with shrinking trade deficits. Senior Fellows of the Peterson Institute for International Economics (PIIE), projected a NAFTA-induced trade surplus with Mexico, in turn, creating 170,000 new U.S. jobs by 1995. Within two years of NAFTA’s passage, PIIE prognosticators readjusted their projection of new NAFTA-created jobs downward to “zero.” The same group, created by billionaire corporate cheerleader Pete Peterson, is again forecasting increased exports and jobs if the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) is passed. Referencing 19 serious pre-NAFTA economic studies projecting zero net job loss if NAFTA were to pass, President Bill Clinton estimated the creation of 200,000 U.S. jobs within two years, and 1 million within five years, based on a projected export boom to Mexico. Twenty years after Clinton signed NAFTA into law, Global Trade Watch reports a 450 percent increase in the U.S. trade deficit, resulting in the export of almost one million jobs, and downward pressure on wages. In fact, the average annual U.S. agricultural trade deficit with Mexico and Canada ballooned to almost three times the pre-NAFTA level, to $975 million within two decades of NAFTA’s passage, eliminating an estimated one million net U.S. jobs by 2004, reports the Economic Policy Institute.

http://goo.gl/KGedEt
Back to top
 

We fight a holy war against the fat and the corrupt and the sinful and the unbelieving!
 
IP Logged
 
vikaryan
Senior Member
****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 453
Gender: male
Re: Wealth inequality: NEVER judge a man by his wealth
Reply #200 - Jul 6th, 2014 at 7:38pm
 
This run-up in wealth was aided by extensive stock speculation, including the Internet bubble, the real-estate bubble and the general rise in the stock market, a trend that reversed early in the Twenty-first Century when the bubbles popped and the financial markets in 2007-08 faced the worst crisis since the Great Depression.

But the crash only temporarily halted this march toward inequality. As Piketty’s chart reveals, after a dip in 2007-2008, there was a sharp rebound upward in divergence of income as government money and policies stabilized the financial markets but did little to help average Americans who faced high unemployment and a flood of home foreclosures destroying the net worth of many middle-class families.

If this pattern of wealth disparity continues, Piketty predicts that the upper 10 percent will have about 60 percent of all income by 2030.

The author takes us further inside the numbers, showing that although the wealth of all segments of the top 10 percent grew faster than the American economy, it was the top 1 percent that grew the most. Its share of national income rose from 9 percent in the 1970s to 20 percent in the new millennium, more than doubling.

And here, Piketty makes one of his cogent observations, pointing out that the peak point for U.S. concentration of wealth in the Twentieth Century was 1929, the year of the Great Crash. In the ensuing 85-year time span, the other highest point of concentration was in 2007. At both points, the system collapsed, wreaking havoc across the economy.

Piketty’s point is that it appears that no economic system can sustain this level of imbalance and stay at equilibrium. These imbalances, with wealth overloaded at the very top, cause dangerous instability, just as the ballast from a broad middle class – like the one during the “Ozzie and Harriet” era a half century earlier – seems to keep a system relatively steady.

http://consortiumnews.com/2014/06/06/tracing-the-source-of-income-inequality/
Back to top
 

We fight a holy war against the fat and the corrupt and the sinful and the unbelieving!
 
IP Logged
 
Postmodern Trendoid III
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 10290
Gender: male
Re: Wealth inequality: NEVER judge a man by his wealth
Reply #201 - Jul 6th, 2014 at 7:42pm
 
BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jul 5th, 2014 at 3:56am:
Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Jul 4th, 2014 at 7:01pm:
BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jul 4th, 2014 at 1:44am:
Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Jul 3rd, 2014 at 8:07pm:
Has wealth equality existed anywhere, at any time?

wow, the tony abbott position: who would've thought the brainiac from scholarly wonderland would've brought out that old chestnut  Cheesy Cheesy

You should do medicine dood: tons of punks out there dishing out what ever walks thru the door  Wink


In other words, you can't point to any example of where it has existed. Like most unthinking "progressives", you hear the word "equality" and believe it's the answer to all the world's problems. Yet there is no example of it achieving the utopia you desire. In fact, where it has been tried, it has resulted in millions of deaths and untold misery.

-->lol, the culture warrior is mis-quoting jesus christ oh here we go... change a few words and ooops culture warrior is like like like Julie Bishop or something oooooooooooooooooooooops!

Do you own an electorate full of crack smoking mummy boys or something?

oh, i smoke crack and learnt about the miracle of peter costello over prawns and crayfish through daddys facial hair at the tab  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

yeh, put it on number 5 in race number 5 son, then dog x at race blah blah boo f'n hoo johnny whatsit  Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked

yeh, real estate franchises are pure bullshit son but they separate you from your loser uncles and aunties ay son  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

... Wink Wink, ..go copper internet in the asian century yeh cos lib voters know stuff and that  Shocked Shocked ...



See, when you're caught out, you resort to batshıt crazy gibberish.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Postmodern Trendoid III
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 10290
Gender: male
Re: Wealth inequality: NEVER judge a man by his wealth
Reply #202 - Jul 6th, 2014 at 7:43pm
 
Winston Smith wrote on Jul 5th, 2014 at 9:13am:
Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Jul 4th, 2014 at 7:01pm:
BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jul 4th, 2014 at 1:44am:
Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Jul 3rd, 2014 at 8:07pm:
Has wealth equality existed anywhere, at any time?

wow, the tony abbott position: who would've thought the brainiac from scholarly wonderland would've brought out that old chestnut  Cheesy Cheesy

You should do medicine dood: tons of punks out there dishing out what ever walks thru the door  Wink


In other words, you can't point to any example of where it has existed. Like most unthinking "progressives", you hear the word "equality" and believe it's the answer to all the world's problems. Yet there is no example of it achieving the utopia you desire. In fact, where it has been tried, it has resulted in millions of deaths and untold misery.


Where has it been tried where it wasn't being constantly sabotaged?


What's your definition of sabotaged?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
vikaryan
Senior Member
****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 453
Gender: male
Re: Wealth inequality: NEVER judge a man by his wealth
Reply #203 - Jul 6th, 2014 at 7:44pm
 
Australia's richest 1% own as much as bottom 60%, says Oxfam


Income inequality has risen since mid-1990s and nine richest people now have greater net worth than poorest 4.54 million

The richest 1% of Australians now own the same wealth as the bottom 60%, according to a new report designed to bolster the case for global and domestic action to shrink the gap between rich and poor.

The Oxfam Australia report also indicated that the nation’s nine richest individuals had a net worth of US$54.8bn, which was more than the combined bottom 20% of the population, or 4.54m people.

The report, released on Monday, follows previous warnings by Oxfam International that the 85 richest people in the world now own the same as half of the world’s population, or 3.5bn people.

“Income inequality in Australia has been on the rise since the mid-1990s, despite all sections of Australian society experiencing some increase in income during the same period,” the report said.

“In 1995, Australia had an average level of inequality compared to other wealthy OECD member countries. Today, we are below average, having become less equal than our peers despite having a better-performing economy than most.”

The report said some economic growth was essential to drive growth and progress, but extreme wealth concentration threatened to exclude hundreds of millions of people around the globe from realising the benefits of their talents and hard work. It could also affect economic growth and poverty reduction.

The chief executive of Oxfam Australia, Helen Szoke, said Australia should use its role as the host of November’s G20 meeting in Brisbane to put inequality on the body’s agenda.

“It’s about what role can Australia play in ensuring that gap doesn’t grow so big that we have major problems globally in the future,” she said.

Szoke said an Oxfam-commissioned poll of 1,016 people across Australia found that 79% of people surveyed felt the gap between the rich and the poor had widened over the past decade “and the majority of those people said that’s made Australia a worse place to live”.

The poll, conducted by Research Now between 28 May and 2 June, showed there was an appetite for Australia to lead the way in global reforms to crack down on tax avoidance, she said.

Oxfam’s report argued tax avoidance by digital brands in developed countries had gained attention but the shifting of profits by multinational companies out of developing and least developed countries was “even more pernicious” and undermined strong global growth.

Transparency was vital in reducing tax avoidance and cracking down on tax havens, the report said.

The treasurer, Joe Hockey, addressed concerns about the issue of inequality when he gave a speech to the Sydney Institute last week denying the budget was unfair.

“The gap between rich and poor has often been used to attack governments when all other avenues have been exhausted,” Hockey said. “But I would argue the comments about inequality in Australia are largely misguided, both from an historical perspective and from the perspective of the budget.”

Hockey said uninterrupted economic growth over two decades had served Australia well, with official data showing average real household disposable income had increased from $540 per week in 1994 to over $820 per week now. He said the growth had been “broadly based across society”.

“And while much focus has been on the ‘rich getting richer’, the more accurate story is the fact that everyone is getting richer as a result of economic development,” Hockey said.

Szoke said: “What is happening globally and the same here is that the gap is widening between the richest and the poorest people. We’re not arguing for equality … our point is not to leave the poorest people behind, whether domestically or globally.”

Former Liberal leader John Hewson last week spoke out against the budget as he launched a separate report pointing to rising income inequality in Australia.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jun/16/australias-richest-1-own-as-much-as-bottom-60-says-oxfam
Back to top
 

We fight a holy war against the fat and the corrupt and the sinful and the unbelieving!
 
IP Logged
 
vikaryan
Senior Member
****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 453
Gender: male
Re: Wealth inequality: NEVER judge a man by his wealth
Reply #204 - Jul 6th, 2014 at 8:07pm
 
Fiat money is the root of all evil.


Due to its inherent physical and economic properties, fiat currency can be highly advantageous to malevolent actors. Paper money is very easy to counterfeit and launder, and almost impossible to trace and track. Due to its inflationary nature, nefarious types like drug dealers, human traffickers, corrupt public officials and other members of the shadow economy use it as their currency of choice to facilitate their ongoing operations. The socioeconomic costs of these activities are shown below.

Money Laundering

In 1996, the IMF estimated that 2-5% of the entire world’s economy involved laundered money – a figure translating to about $1.5 trillion a year. Whilst this figure seems large, several other experts estimate that the value is closer to $2.85 trillion per year (Smith, 2011). These experts are backed by a 2008 UN report into money-laundering and globalisation which put the figure at anywhere between $800 billion and $3 trillion per annum (UN Office on Drugs and Crime, 2008).

A report by The Council on Foreign Relations translates this dollar figure poignantly into human costs, citing 50,000 deaths in Mexico over the past 6 years due to drug trafficking, as well as the enslavement of 27 million people in forced labour, prostitution, and other activities relate to human trafficking (Council on Foreign Relations, 2013). Social costs of illegal arms trafficking are difficult to quantify, but are no doubt significant.

Seigniorage

As shown in the above calculations, the cost to print money is substantially less than what the money is valued at. The result is inflation / loss of consumer buying power. Global average yearly inflation is 3.9% (CIA World Factbook, 2013), which makes your money worth more than 30% less after 10 years, less than half after 20 years, and 70% less over 30 years, a reasonable estimate for length for a retirement commencing in 2014.


Corruption

In addition to the social damage and the trillions of dollars that money laundering costs the global economy, it is estimated that an additional $1.6 trillion is lost to governments around the world every year (BBC News, 2009) due to corrupt politicians and public officials.

Transactional fraud

Transactional fraud, mainly through credit and debit cards, cost the global economy a staggering $190 billion per year (LexisNexis, 2013).

Institutional Fraud

The Association of Certified Fraud Examiners estimates the yearly cost of fraud to be 5% of global revenues, or, $3.7 trillion per year, based on 2013 global figures (Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, 2014).

It should be noted that institutional fraud is a problem that is systemic to humans, and not to monetary systems per se. However, as there have been several attacks against the quantity of institutional fraud and scams found in the unregulated world of Bitcoin, it is useful to quantify the magnitude of fraud in the regulated world of corporations. Due to the frequency and magnitude of fraud in the legacy system, I will only refer to single fraud events larger than the largest ever single alleged institutional Bitcoin fraud event (Mt Gox in 2014), so as to not encumber the reader with too many examples.

http://www.coindesk.com/microscope-real-costs-dollar/
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jul 6th, 2014 at 8:54pm by vikaryan »  

Pic-10-table-12.png (49 KB | 31 )
Pic-10-table-12.png

We fight a holy war against the fat and the corrupt and the sinful and the unbelieving!
 
IP Logged
 
vikaryan
Senior Member
****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 453
Gender: male
Re: Wealth inequality: NEVER judge a man by his wealth
Reply #205 - Jul 6th, 2014 at 8:14pm
 
Fiat money is the root of all evil.


The Black Market

In addition to the more than $3 trillion dollars lost to laundering and corruption, the world’s economy is subject to a further loss of $1.8 trillion dollars to the black market. A lot of the money that enters the black market is “clean”, i.e., a citizen using legally obtained money to purchase illegal goods. The breakdown of this $1.8 trillion dollar market is shown in the table below (Havoscope, 2014).

http://www.coindesk.com/microscope-real-costs-dollar/
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jul 6th, 2014 at 8:37pm by vikaryan »  

Pic-12-table-14.png (85 KB | 29 )
Pic-12-table-14.png

We fight a holy war against the fat and the corrupt and the sinful and the unbelieving!
 
IP Logged
 
vikaryan
Senior Member
****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 453
Gender: male
Re: Wealth inequality: NEVER judge a man by his wealth
Reply #206 - Jul 6th, 2014 at 9:19pm
 
Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Jul 6th, 2014 at 7:43pm:
Winston Smith wrote on Jul 5th, 2014 at 9:13am:
Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Jul 4th, 2014 at 7:01pm:
BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jul 4th, 2014 at 1:44am:
Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Jul 3rd, 2014 at 8:07pm:
Has wealth equality existed anywhere, at any time?

wow, the tony abbott position: who would've thought the brainiac from scholarly wonderland would've brought out that old chestnut  Cheesy Cheesy

You should do medicine dood: tons of punks out there dishing out what ever walks thru the door  Wink


In other words, you can't point to any example of where it has existed. Like most unthinking "progressives", you hear the word "equality" and believe it's the answer to all the world's problems. Yet there is no example of it achieving the utopia you desire. In fact, where it has been tried, it has resulted in millions of deaths and untold misery.


Where has it been tried where it wasn't being constantly sabotaged?


What's your definition of sabotaged?


The unbalanced, egotistical man, Joseph Stalin, was far more sinister than his fellow leaders ever imagined.  Right away, Stalin hijacked a political movement that was designed to improve Russia.  His psychopathic machinations terrorized Mother Russia immediately at the outset of his regime.  Then, as the Soviet Union barely survived the onslaught of the Nazi Wehrmacht against the country, Stalin captured the momentum and snowballed his absolute power to incredible strength.

http://bluejayblog.wordpress.com/2013/07/10/stalins-curse-review/
Back to top
 

sss.jpg (42 KB | 33 )
sss.jpg

We fight a holy war against the fat and the corrupt and the sinful and the unbelieving!
 
IP Logged
 
vikaryan
Senior Member
****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 453
Gender: male
Re: Wealth inequality: NEVER judge a man by his wealth
Reply #207 - Jul 6th, 2014 at 9:26pm
 
vikaryan wrote on Jul 6th, 2014 at 9:19pm:
Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Jul 6th, 2014 at 7:43pm:
Winston Smith wrote on Jul 5th, 2014 at 9:13am:
Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Jul 4th, 2014 at 7:01pm:
BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jul 4th, 2014 at 1:44am:
Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Jul 3rd, 2014 at 8:07pm:
Has wealth equality existed anywhere, at any time?

wow, the tony abbott position: who would've thought the brainiac from scholarly wonderland would've brought out that old chestnut  Cheesy Cheesy

You should do medicine dood: tons of punks out there dishing out what ever walks thru the door  Wink


In other words, you can't point to any example of where it has existed. Like most unthinking "progressives", you hear the word "equality" and believe it's the answer to all the world's problems. Yet there is no example of it achieving the utopia you desire. In fact, where it has been tried, it has resulted in millions of deaths and untold misery.


Where has it been tried where it wasn't being constantly sabotaged?


What's your definition of sabotaged?


The unbalanced, egotistical man, Joseph Stalin, was far more sinister than his fellow leaders ever imagined.  Right away, Stalin hijacked a political movement that was designed to improve Russia.  His psychopathic machinations terrorized Mother Russia immediately at the outset of his regime.  Then, as the Soviet Union barely survived the onslaught of the Nazi Wehrmacht against the country, Stalin captured the momentum and snowballed his absolute power to incredible strength.

http://bluejayblog.wordpress.com/2013/07/10/stalins-curse-review/


Communism evolved on its own, and as an ideal it cannot be belittled just because what was known as "communism" was hijacked by some states in the 1920s and turned into a totalitarian state-controlled system.


European Conference of Local Authorities, ‎Council of Europe - 1993

http://books.google.com.au/books?id=DwX-Hd8ss2gC&pg=PA663&dq=communism+hijacked&hl=en&sa=X&ei=DDK5U8fCN4rCkwWNhoE4&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=communism%20hijacked&f=false
Back to top
 

stal.jpg (90 KB | 21 )
stal.jpg

We fight a holy war against the fat and the corrupt and the sinful and the unbelieving!
 
IP Logged
 
BatteriesNotIncluded
Gold Member
*****
Offline


MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966
Re: Wealth inequality: NEVER judge a man by his wealth
Reply #208 - Jul 6th, 2014 at 11:57pm
 
Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Jul 6th, 2014 at 7:42pm:
BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jul 5th, 2014 at 3:56am:
Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Jul 4th, 2014 at 7:01pm:
BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jul 4th, 2014 at 1:44am:
Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Jul 3rd, 2014 at 8:07pm:
Has wealth equality existed anywhere, at any time?

wow, the tony abbott position: who would've thought the brainiac from scholarly wonderland would've brought out that old chestnut  Cheesy Cheesy

You should do medicine dood: tons of punks out there dishing out what ever walks thru the door  Wink


In other words, you can't point to any example of where it has existed. Like most unthinking "progressives", you hear the word "equality" and believe it's the answer to all the world's problems. Yet there is no example of it achieving the utopia you desire. In fact, where it has been tried, it has resulted in millions of deaths and untold misery.

-->lol, the culture warrior is mis-quoting jesus christ oh here we go... change a few words and ooops culture warrior is like like like Julie Bishop or something oooooooooooooooooooooops!

Do you own an electorate full of crack smoking mummy boys or something?

oh, i smoke crack and learnt about the miracle of peter costello over prawns and crayfish through daddys facial hair at the tab  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

yeh, put it on number 5 in race number 5 son, then dog x at race blah blah boo f'n hoo johnny whatsit  Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked

yeh, real estate franchises are pure bullshit son but they separate you from your loser uncles and aunties ay son  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

... Wink Wink, ..go copper internet in the asian century yeh cos lib voters know stuff and that  Shocked Shocked ...



See, when you're caught out, you resort to batshıt crazy gibberish.

culture warrior: a liberal voter who reckons anyone else is bat poo crazy  Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is.  It wouldn't be there without the tax payer.  Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know....  (swaggy) *
 
IP Logged
 
Postmodern Trendoid III
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 10290
Gender: male
Re: Wealth inequality: NEVER judge a man by his wealth
Reply #209 - Jul 7th, 2014 at 9:08pm
 
vikaryan wrote on Jul 6th, 2014 at 9:26pm:
vikaryan wrote on Jul 6th, 2014 at 9:19pm:
Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Jul 6th, 2014 at 7:43pm:
Winston Smith wrote on Jul 5th, 2014 at 9:13am:
Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Jul 4th, 2014 at 7:01pm:
BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jul 4th, 2014 at 1:44am:
Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Jul 3rd, 2014 at 8:07pm:
Has wealth equality existed anywhere, at any time?

wow, the tony abbott position: who would've thought the brainiac from scholarly wonderland would've brought out that old chestnut  Cheesy Cheesy

You should do medicine dood: tons of punks out there dishing out what ever walks thru the door  Wink


In other words, you can't point to any example of where it has existed. Like most unthinking "progressives", you hear the word "equality" and believe it's the answer to all the world's problems. Yet there is no example of it achieving the utopia you desire. In fact, where it has been tried, it has resulted in millions of deaths and untold misery.


Where has it been tried where it wasn't being constantly sabotaged?


What's your definition of sabotaged?


The unbalanced, egotistical man, Joseph Stalin, was far more sinister than his fellow leaders ever imagined.  Right away, Stalin hijacked a political movement that was designed to improve Russia.  His psychopathic machinations terrorized Mother Russia immediately at the outset of his regime.  Then, as the Soviet Union barely survived the onslaught of the Nazi Wehrmacht against the country, Stalin captured the momentum and snowballed his absolute power to incredible strength.

http://bluejayblog.wordpress.com/2013/07/10/stalins-curse-review/


Communism evolved on its own, and as an ideal it cannot be belittled just because what was known as "communism" was hijacked by some states in the 1920s and turned into a totalitarian state-controlled system.


European Conference of Local Authorities, ‎Council of Europe - 1993

http://books.google.com.au/books?id=DwX-Hd8ss2gC&pg=PA663&dq=communism+hijacked&hl=en&sa=X&ei=DDK5U8fCN4rCkwWNhoE4&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=communism%20hijacked&f=false


So how do you create equality without massive state intervention into peoples' lives?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 12 13 14 15 
Send Topic Print