Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 ... 15
Send Topic Print
Wealth inequality: NEVER judge a man by his wealth (Read 15975 times)
ian
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 9451
Re: Wealth inequality: NEVER judge a man by his wealth
Reply #150 - Jul 3rd, 2014 at 10:17am
 
Winston Smith wrote on Jul 3rd, 2014 at 9:16am:
[
This is exactly what I mean, pure social Darwinist nonsense. Parrotting fallacious propaganda of a bygone era is all you are capable of. I gave you several opportunities to validate your views, to which you responded by doubling down on the spin. Don't worry, I know you've crossed that mental barrier of wanting to seem rational, to sullen trolling as a consolation prize for being exposed. Now that you are back in your box, I will leave you alone for a while. Until you begin delude yourself that there is some credibity to your delusions and come back out of the woodwork attempting to validate them.
You are fat and soft arent you winston? Just an observation.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Sprintcyclist
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 41056
Gender: male
Re: Wealth inequality: NEVER judge a man by his wealth
Reply #151 - Jul 3rd, 2014 at 10:20am
 
ian wrote on Jul 3rd, 2014 at 10:17am:
Winston Smith wrote on Jul 3rd, 2014 at 9:16am:
[
This is exactly what I mean, pure social Darwinist nonsense. Parrotting fallacious propaganda of a bygone era is all you are capable of. I gave you several opportunities to validate your views, to which you responded by doubling down on the spin. Don't worry, I know you've crossed that mental barrier of wanting to seem rational, to sullen trolling as a consolation prize for being exposed. Now that you are back in your box, I will leave you alone for a while. Until you begin delude yourself that there is some credibity to your delusions and come back out of the woodwork attempting to validate them.
You are fat and soft arent you winston? Just an observation.


he sounds soft and fat to me.
Back to top
 

Modern Classic Right Wing
 
IP Logged
 
Winston Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Ministry of Truth

Posts: 1549
Oceania
Gender: male
Re: Wealth inequality: NEVER judge a man by his wealth
Reply #152 - Jul 3rd, 2014 at 10:24am
 
ian wrote on Jul 3rd, 2014 at 10:17am:
Winston Smith wrote on Jul 3rd, 2014 at 9:16am:
[
This is exactly what I mean, pure social Darwinist nonsense. Parrotting fallacious propaganda of a bygone era is all you are capable of. I gave you several opportunities to validate your views, to which you responded by doubling down on the spin. Don't worry, I know you've crossed that mental barrier of wanting to seem rational, to sullen trolling as a consolation prize for being exposed. Now that you are back in your box, I will leave you alone for a while. Until you begin delude yourself that there is some credibity to your delusions and come back out of the woodwork attempting to validate them.
You are fat and soft arent you winston? Just an observation.


Nope I'm of average size, in the prime of my life.

Why on earth would you think that?
Back to top
 

Big Brother is watching you
 
IP Logged
 
Winston Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Ministry of Truth

Posts: 1549
Oceania
Gender: male
Re: Wealth inequality: NEVER judge a man by his wealth
Reply #153 - Jul 3rd, 2014 at 10:27am
 
Sprintcyclist wrote on Jul 3rd, 2014 at 10:20am:
ian wrote on Jul 3rd, 2014 at 10:17am:
Winston Smith wrote on Jul 3rd, 2014 at 9:16am:
[
This is exactly what I mean, pure social Darwinist nonsense. Parrotting fallacious propaganda of a bygone era is all you are capable of. I gave you several opportunities to validate your views, to which you responded by doubling down on the spin. Don't worry, I know you've crossed that mental barrier of wanting to seem rational, to sullen trolling as a consolation prize for being exposed. Now that you are back in your box, I will leave you alone for a while. Until you begin delude yourself that there is some credibity to your delusions and come back out of the woodwork attempting to validate them.
You are fat and soft arent you winston? Just an observation.


he sounds soft and fat to me.


That's because you assume others are like you and formulate the basis of their arguments disingenuously. Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Big Brother is watching you
 
IP Logged
 
BatteriesNotIncluded
Gold Member
*****
Offline


MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966
Re: Wealth inequality: NEVER judge a man by his wealth
Reply #154 - Jul 3rd, 2014 at 10:32am
 
Winston Smith wrote on Jul 3rd, 2014 at 10:27am:
Sprintcyclist wrote on Jul 3rd, 2014 at 10:20am:
ian wrote on Jul 3rd, 2014 at 10:17am:
Winston Smith wrote on Jul 3rd, 2014 at 9:16am:
[
This is exactly what I mean, pure social Darwinist nonsense. Parrotting fallacious propaganda of a bygone era is all you are capable of. I gave you several opportunities to validate your views, to which you responded by doubling down on the spin. Don't worry, I know you've crossed that mental barrier of wanting to seem rational, to sullen trolling as a consolation prize for being exposed. Now that you are back in your box, I will leave you alone for a while. Until you begin delude yourself that there is some credibity to your delusions and come back out of the woodwork attempting to validate them.
You are fat and soft arent you winston? Just an observation.


he sounds soft and fat to me.


That's because you assume others are like you and formulate the basis of their arguments disingenuously. Roll Eyes

haha, the sword of wisdom is with this one
  Cool Cool
Back to top
 

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is.  It wouldn't be there without the tax payer.  Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know....  (swaggy) *
 
IP Logged
 
ian
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 9451
Re: Wealth inequality: NEVER judge a man by his wealth
Reply #155 - Jul 3rd, 2014 at 10:43am
 
........
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
ian
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 9451
Re: Wealth inequality: NEVER judge a man by his wealth
Reply #156 - Jul 3rd, 2014 at 10:48am
 
Winston Smith wrote on Jul 3rd, 2014 at 10:24am:
ian wrote on Jul 3rd, 2014 at 10:17am:
Winston Smith wrote on Jul 3rd, 2014 at 9:16am:
[
This is exactly what I mean, pure social Darwinist nonsense. Parrotting fallacious propaganda of a bygone era is all you are capable of. I gave you several opportunities to validate your views, to which you responded by doubling down on the spin. Don't worry, I know you've crossed that mental barrier of wanting to seem rational, to sullen trolling as a consolation prize for being exposed. Now that you are back in your box, I will leave you alone for a while. Until you begin delude yourself that there is some credibity to your delusions and come back out of the woodwork attempting to validate them.
You are fat and soft arent you winston? Just an observation.


Nope I'm of average size, in the prime of my life.

Why on earth would you think that?
I  note  that you always try to attempt to win debates by bringing out your alleged intellectual superiority, this is a trait often exhibited by those who are physically weak and incapable.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Winston Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Ministry of Truth

Posts: 1549
Oceania
Gender: male
Re: Wealth inequality: NEVER judge a man by his wealth
Reply #157 - Jul 3rd, 2014 at 10:56am
 
ian wrote on Jul 3rd, 2014 at 10:48am:
Winston Smith wrote on Jul 3rd, 2014 at 10:24am:
ian wrote on Jul 3rd, 2014 at 10:17am:
Winston Smith wrote on Jul 3rd, 2014 at 9:16am:
[
This is exactly what I mean, pure social Darwinist nonsense. Parrotting fallacious propaganda of a bygone era is all you are capable of. I gave you several opportunities to validate your views, to which you responded by doubling down on the spin. Don't worry, I know you've crossed that mental barrier of wanting to seem rational, to sullen trolling as a consolation prize for being exposed. Now that you are back in your box, I will leave you alone for a while. Until you begin delude yourself that there is some credibity to your delusions and come back out of the woodwork attempting to validate them.
You are fat and soft arent you winston? Just an observation.


Nope I'm of average size, in the prime of my life.

Why on earth would you think that?
I  note  that you always try to attempt to win debates by bringing out your alleged intellectual superiority, this is a trait often exhibited by those who are physically weak and incapable.


Translation: I am frustrated by what appears to be your intellectual superiority and must resort to ad hominem attacks once my lack of reasoning has been exposed.
Back to top
 

Big Brother is watching you
 
IP Logged
 
ian
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 9451
Re: Wealth inequality: NEVER judge a man by his wealth
Reply #158 - Jul 3rd, 2014 at 11:09am
 
Winston Smith wrote on Jul 3rd, 2014 at 10:56am:
ian wrote on Jul 3rd, 2014 at 10:48am:
Winston Smith wrote on Jul 3rd, 2014 at 10:24am:
ian wrote on Jul 3rd, 2014 at 10:17am:
Winston Smith wrote on Jul 3rd, 2014 at 9:16am:
[
This is exactly what I mean, pure social Darwinist nonsense. Parrotting fallacious propaganda of a bygone era is all you are capable of. I gave you several opportunities to validate your views, to which you responded by doubling down on the spin. Don't worry, I know you've crossed that mental barrier of wanting to seem rational, to sullen trolling as a consolation prize for being exposed. Now that you are back in your box, I will leave you alone for a while. Until you begin delude yourself that there is some credibity to your delusions and come back out of the woodwork attempting to validate them.
You are fat and soft arent you winston? Just an observation.


Nope I'm of average size, in the prime of my life.

Why on earth would you think that?
I  note  that you always try to attempt to win debates by bringing out your alleged intellectual superiority, this is a trait often exhibited by those who are physically weak and incapable.


Translation: I am frustrated by what appears to be your intellectual superiority and must resort to ad hominem attacks once my lack of reasoning has been exposed.

No reason for me to be frustrated Winston. And I made it clear I made an observation. I also note you continually resort to claiming other posters have a tendency towards social darwinism, this appears to be your main resort when you get frustrated, by continually using the same argument you illustrate the shallowness of your knowledge base. You have an inclination to use 2 sentences when 2 words will do which shows your communication skills are also poor. I suggest you are socially challennged with few friends and are probably unable to hold down a full time job for very long.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
BatteriesNotIncluded
Gold Member
*****
Offline


MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966
Re: Wealth inequality: NEVER judge a man by his wealth
Reply #159 - Jul 3rd, 2014 at 11:18am
 
ian wrote on Jul 3rd, 2014 at 10:43am:
........

perhaps not entirely: he, like the rest of us, is indulging in argumentative pointless conversation!
Back to top
 

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is.  It wouldn't be there without the tax payer.  Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know....  (swaggy) *
 
IP Logged
 
Winston Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Ministry of Truth

Posts: 1549
Oceania
Gender: male
Re: Wealth inequality: NEVER judge a man by his wealth
Reply #160 - Jul 3rd, 2014 at 11:33am
 
ian wrote on Jul 3rd, 2014 at 11:09am:
Winston Smith wrote on Jul 3rd, 2014 at 10:56am:
ian wrote on Jul 3rd, 2014 at 10:48am:
Winston Smith wrote on Jul 3rd, 2014 at 10:24am:
ian wrote on Jul 3rd, 2014 at 10:17am:
Winston Smith wrote on Jul 3rd, 2014 at 9:16am:
[
This is exactly what I mean, pure social Darwinist nonsense. Parrotting fallacious propaganda of a bygone era is all you are capable of. I gave you several opportunities to validate your views, to which you responded by doubling down on the spin. Don't worry, I know you've crossed that mental barrier of wanting to seem rational, to sullen trolling as a consolation prize for being exposed. Now that you are back in your box, I will leave you alone for a while. Until you begin delude yourself that there is some credibity to your delusions and come back out of the woodwork attempting to validate them.
You are fat and soft arent you winston? Just an observation.


Nope I'm of average size, in the prime of my life.

Why on earth would you think that?
I  note  that you always try to attempt to win debates by bringing out your alleged intellectual superiority, this is a trait often exhibited by those who are physically weak and incapable.


Translation: I am frustrated by what appears to be your intellectual superiority and must resort to ad hominem attacks once my lack of reasoning has been exposed.

No reason for me to be frustrated Winston. And I made it clear I made an observation. I also note you continually resort to claiming other posters have a tendency towards social darwinism, this appears to be your main resort when you get frustrated, by continually using the same argument you illustrate the shallowness of your knowledge base. You have an inclination to use 2 sentences when 2 words will do which shows your communication skills are also poor. I suggest you are socially challennged with few friends and are probably unable to hold down a full time job for very long.


Well you are telling the story, but I notice that you still haven't disputed my postion with facts in any of those cases.

You would rather attack me for exposing fallacious thinking.
Back to top
 

Big Brother is watching you
 
IP Logged
 
vikaryan
Senior Member
****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 453
Gender: male
Re: Wealth inequality: NEVER judge a man by his wealth
Reply #161 - Jul 3rd, 2014 at 11:49am
 
When President Obama truthfully said “the private sector is doing fine,” Romney and the right wing quickly cherry picked and tied it to the top of his campaign bus.

Obama’s comment was not only true, but an understatement. The private sector is doing great. The Fortune 500 had a record $824 billion in profits last year. CEO pay is up 15 percent.

The corporate tax rate is at a 40 year low. Who is not doing so great are the middle class wage earners working for the private sector. The private sector “job creators” have been laying off workers and squeezing more production and less wages and benefits out of the remaining employees. As the wages of the middle class decline, the net worth of the elite .1 percent has been growing exponentially This decline of the middle class and the rise of the .1 percent started 40 years ago.

A graph was recently released showing the declining middle class wages goes hand in hand with the decline of union workers.

http://www.eugeneweekly.com/article/letters-editor-6-14-2012
Back to top
 

We fight a holy war against the fat and the corrupt and the sinful and the unbelieving!
 
IP Logged
 
vikaryan
Senior Member
****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 453
Gender: male
Re: Wealth inequality: NEVER judge a man by his wealth
Reply #162 - Jul 3rd, 2014 at 6:48pm
 
As proof, look no farther than Agora Financial’s 5-Minute Forecast’s synopsis of the Federal Reserve’s weekly H.4.1 statement, which they characterize as “the Fed’s consolidated balance sheet,” and found “$4.37 trillion in ‘assets,’ if that’s what you want to call them, compared with $56.3 billion in capital. That’s a leverage ratio of 77.6- to-1.”

Leveraged 80 times! Imagine you borrowing 80 times as much as everything you own! Insane! No Freaking Wonder (NFW) the Fed is so desperately worried about “deflation” in the price of assets, as so incredibly, so stupendously, so impossibly, so incomprehensibly much money is at stake, with so little backing!

And inflation in prices is not just caused by inflation in the money supply, but also higher prices caused by businesses passing on the costs of compliance to government regulations, too!

Lawson Bader, president of the Competitive Enterprise Institute, introduces a study which found that in the last 21 years, “federal agencies have issued nearly 88,000 rules, more than 3,500 per year, or about nine per day.”

Mr. Bader summarizes it as “Last year, the feds spent $3.5 trillion. That is a lot, but the cost of the federal government doesn’t end there. Regulations imposed an economic burden of $1.86 trillion last year.”

And the damage continues unabated, as “Last year, Congress passed 72 laws, while agencies issued 3,659 regulations — a difference of a factor of more than 50.”

I can see by the look of astonishment on your face that this is more, more, MORE than enough for you suddenly slap your forehead in disbelief, and exclaim with a look of dumbfounded horror on your beautiful face, “Wow! That idiot Mogambo was right! We’re freaking doomed! I need to get gold and silver bullion, and oil stocks, and Right Freaking Now (RFN)! Time’s a-wastin’!”

http://news.goldseek.com/RichardDaughty/1404219850.php
Back to top
 

We fight a holy war against the fat and the corrupt and the sinful and the unbelieving!
 
IP Logged
 
Postmodern Trendoid III
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 10290
Gender: male
Re: Wealth inequality: NEVER judge a man by his wealth
Reply #163 - Jul 3rd, 2014 at 8:07pm
 
Has wealth equality existed anywhere, at any time?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
BatteriesNotIncluded
Gold Member
*****
Offline


MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966
Re: Wealth inequality: NEVER judge a man by his wealth
Reply #164 - Jul 4th, 2014 at 1:44am
 
Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Jul 3rd, 2014 at 8:07pm:
Has wealth equality existed anywhere, at any time?

wow, the tony abbott position: who would've thought the brainiac from scholarly wonderland would've brought out that old chestnut  Cheesy Cheesy

You should do medicine dood: tons of punks out there dishing out what ever walks thru the door  Wink
Back to top
 

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is.  It wouldn't be there without the tax payer.  Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know....  (swaggy) *
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 ... 15
Send Topic Print