The Global Warming hoax is real

 

Re: "Icebound Antarctic ship awaits helicopter rescue," The Denver Post, Dec. 30, 2013. 

There is a little bit of sweet schadenfreude in the plight of the ice-bound Russian ship. The passengers, apparently a group of climate scientists and eco-tourists, were presumably seeking to verify the shrinking south polar ice cap. After being trapped by, wait for it, ice and ignominiously airlifted to safety, they will all return home to affirm their religious beliefs of man-made global warming. Oh, by the way, this was summer in the southern hemisphere.

The Democrat global warming hoax cannot explain the deep freeze the world is now going through and the global warming lunatics stuck in the ice on those ships at the South Pole where it was summer down there.

The world has been warming and cooling for millions of years. Man has nothing to do with the weather. Very sad when people fall prey to such nonsense as is global warming.

This idea of human-induced global warming is the greatest hoax ever perpetrated in human history. In reality, it is nothing but a fraud, a get-rich-quick scheme for climate scientists on government grants and washed-up politicians like Al Gore.

If Al Gore and his ilk were right with these outrageous claims in the 1990s, Miami and New Orleans would be 20 feet under water right now. Why doesn’t anybody ever hold these zealots accountable for their idiotic predictions?

These zealots have done enough damage to our country. Their paranoia has led to our dependence on Middle Eastern oil, which has resulted in funding of Muslim extremists whose top priority in life is to kill us.

A prominent scientist and former NASA researcher challenges the “scientific fact” that manmade carbon emissions are causing global warming. Leslie Woodcock is a professor emeritus of chemical thermodynamics at the University of Manchester in England.  He has stated that “The theory is that CO2 emitted by burning fossil fuel is an unsubstantiated hypothesis.” Many of today’s global warming scientists have a political and commercial interest in perpetuating this false premise. Our government through its research grants has a significant impact on the thinking of these “warming scientists.” He goes on to say, “it’s become almost an industry, as a consequence of this professional misconduct by government advisors around the world.” Interestingly, there are instruments that exist that measure the ocean temperatures around the world (ARGO Buoy System with 3,200 buoys) that do not support the earth warming theory. Additionally, the ERBC satellites data has shown that as the earth’s surface periodically warms, it gives off more heat. This is in direct opposition to the climate change models that predict a runaway condition. The climate change propaganda is a hoax. Do your own research as I have.

Conservatives (i.e. right-wingers) trust proven scientific facts and theory, not artificial intelligence of computers programmed to report imaginary results to support a predetermined agenda.

The IPCC report published in 2007 reported that developing countries would need $100 billion a year to implement green politics. Based on crass science, man-made climate change has grown into an industry of interest groups, lobbyists, litigators, impact assessors, bureaucratic mobs and liberal politicians who take advantage of the gullible for their $100 billion.

IPCC also reported that the Himalayan glaciers would disappear by 2035. The United Kingdom climate scientists squelched any dissent from scientific researchers who disagreed with them. Do we hear any comment from the United Nations on the report by a group of scientists from The Heartland Institute in Chicago The Heartland Institute released a 1,062-page report, which found that higher carbon dioxide concentrations and rising temperatures are causing “no net harm to the global environment or to human health.”

The institute also found that increasing carbon dioxide levels produces a beneficial effect on plants including important food crops and to animals and human health.

The thinking of global warming alarmism is comparable to a crazy guy heading full steam ahead over a cliff while putting all his attention on trying to correct bad radio reception.

There are a number of threats many times more serious than an increase in the plant fertilizer - CO2. Here are some.

(1) The threat of an asteroid. The question is not if, but when this will happen. In the past an asteroid wiped out about 90 percent of life on earth, and another hit could destroy the human race.

(2) A solar flare. Again, the question is not if, but when. In 1859 we were hit by one that knocked out telegraph systems all over America and Europe. We are totally unprepared for another event like this, which would create chaos and destruction.

(3) A magnetic pulse created by an atomic explosion in our atmosphere by a rogue nation would produce similar results.

(4) Nuclear missiles headed our way. This can be overcome by a missile defense envisioned by Reagan.

Future generations will look back on our judgment, and by comparison the flat-earth people of the Middle Ages will look pretty good.

The New American, 24 June 2014

Global-warming Hoax Unraveling — Someone Tell Obama
by Selwyn Duke: 

The global-warming agenda is increasingly being revealed for the scam it is. There was the Climategate scandal of 2009, in which “scientists” at the University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit were conspiring to suppress data that contradicted their global-warming agenda; there was the British judge who ruled, in a lawsuit to ban Al Gore’s film An Inconvenient Truth from UK government schools, that the movie contained nine significant errors; there was the revelation that the claim that 97 percent of scientists agreed with the AGW (man-caused global warming) thesis was bunk. Now a mainstream publication, the UK’s Telegraph, has published a scathing denunciation of warmist propaganda.

Citing information from Steven Goddard’s blog Real Science, Christopher Booker writes:

Quote:


Booker also asks what it means when a theory has to be promoted with continual “fudging” of the data. Is it science at all? Perhaps, however, he has those English manners that preclude one from saying what I, in my colonial brashness, will put bluntly: these so-called scientists aren’t merely “fudging.”

They’re lying.

If they were Pinocchio, their collective nose would be the size of our national debt. If they were shepherds, they could be a whole boys’ school that cried wolf. Despite this, Western pseudo-elites are still running around like Chicken Little.

For example, while Iraq becomes an Islamic state, Russia moves on Ukraine, China angles to be the world’s hegemon, and the United States is in moral freefall, Barack Obama gives a commencement speech at the University of California, Irvine, condemning climate-change “deniers” (translation: people in touch with reality). He also recently commended New Zealand prime minister John Key for being a fellow Chicken Little in his “crusade” against climate change, and Obama’s EPA continues to unconstitutionally enforce regulations designed to reduce carbon emissions, even though calling CO2 “carbon” is a lot like calling H2O “hydrogen.”

Of course, Obama and Key have much company in their hen house. Former treasury secretary Hank Paulson, for instance, recently wrote the following in the New York Times (hat tip: Thomas Lifson):

Quote:


Yes, act now, think later. Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain!

The irony of this is that even if the AGW thesis were correct, there would be little we could do about it. First, China and India — which together boast 36 percent of the world’s population — are rapidly building coal-fired power plants. Any Western reduction in CO2 will be dwarfed by these behemoths’ increases alone. Add to this other CO2-happy developing nations and Russia, and the fruitlessness of the uniquely Western climate-change obsession becomes apparent.

Second, there are scientists who believe that AGW is a reality, but said long ago that it was too late to do anything about it, anyway. So are we cooked? Now the good news.

Whatever the cause, there’s no reason to be afraid of the big bad climate change.

Not if it’s in the direction of rising mercury, that is.

Contrary to the doom-and-gloom rhetoric, it seems a warmer planet’s benefits far outweigh its downsides. Like eating? Note that greater temperatures probably mean more arable land. In addition, higher CO2 levels increase plant yields 30-plus percent across species; this begets better crops. This is why botanists pump the gas into their greenhouses, mind you. It’s why the age of the dinosaurs was one of dense foliage — CO2 levels were five to 10 times what they are today. The gas is not a pollutant. It’s plant food.

The New American, 24 June 2014

Global-warming Hoax Unraveling — Someone Tell Obama
by Selwyn Duke: 

Moreover, as the aforementioned Jurassic CO2 levels indicate, climate change is not unprecedented. There was a time when the waters surrounding Florida were 300 feet lower and another when they were 100 feet higher. The Earth was completely or almost completely covered with snow and ice during the Cryogenian period while during another time the snow and ice were virtually gone. There have been four or five major ice ages and numerous minor ones; there are 100,000-year glacial periods followed by 12,000-year interglacials (approximations) and 1,500-year cycles of heating and cooling within them. Climate is no more stable than are people.

Speaking of which, there’s a philosophical point to be made here. The liberal climate alarmists are the first to say that humans are just animals, just part of nature like an amoeba. If this is true, however, wouldn’t we then just be another “natural” factor in naturally occurring climate change?

At most, though, we appear a negligible factor. This raises a question: Why won’t Obama, Gore, Paulson, and the other Chicken Littles fly the coop of climate fear?

One reason is that everyone needs something to give his life meaning, and, absent true faith, an environmental crusade in Gaia’s name perhaps best fits the bill. This means that, for some, leaving the Church of Warmism is like a jihadist leaving Islam. Related to this is that when you’ve devoted a good part of your life and your passion and energy to a cause, it’s hard to admit you’re wrong.

But there’s another reason. Many individuals and companies, such as those producing ethanol, are profiting via doomsday prophesying. For instance, Al Gore — perhaps one of history’s most shameless con-men — “could become [the] world's first carbon billionaire,” reported The Telegraph in 2009. This, not to mention all the climate-change grants governments give malleable scientists for “research.”

What this means is that, despite its unraveling, the climate-change con will be around for a while longer. But driven by a combination of naiveté (gullible followers), envy, and cash, at least we can say that the “green” movement has certainly earned its name.

Quote:


So the denialist admit ACW is a threat

Thats a good beginning point.

Which denialists agree co2 is a threat and which don't?

vikaryan wrote on Jun 25^th, 2014 at 8:48am:


I don't think anyone is really disputing these things, they are not relevant to current discussion. Yes, the climate has changed in the past.

vikaryan wrote on Jun 25^th, 2014 at 8:48am:


The behaviour leading to it is the same no matter what label you use as are the consequences.

vikaryan wrote on Jun 25^th, 2014 at 8:48am:


A point, based on nothing. Just stated. What of all the evidence that says otherwise?

vikaryan wrote on Jun 25^th, 2014 at 8:48am:


So accusations, and still no evidence, just calling people wrong.

vikaryan wrote on Jun 25^th, 2014 at 8:48am:


Really. Economic benefit? I'm sure the big carbon produces have no vested interest and exert little political pressure 

vikaryan wrote on Jun 25^th, 2014 at 8:48am:


Because nothing is unravelling, and this piece sure hasn't provided any evidence at all.

austranger wrote on Jun 25^th, 2014 at 8:47am:


You mean wild swings in weather that may cause treacherous driving conditions for Learner drivers???

Telegraph.co.uk-21 Jun 2014

The US has actually been cooling since the Thirties, the hottest decade on record

By Christopher Booker
4:04PM BST 21 Jun 2014

Quote:

The idea that AGW could be a hoax is ludicrous in the extreme. That so many people would participate and willfully hide the truth for near no benefit against powerful opponents defies rationality.

facts should determine opinions and policy

.

Credible scientific evidence establishes “global warming” is not occurring, nor is there any man-made threat through consumption of fossil fuels.

vikaryan wrote on Jun 25^th, 2014 at 10:04am:


There is so many things wrong with this.

For one, even if the earth was not warming, which it is, fossil fuels create pollution which affects huge numbers of people leading to early deaths via a variety diseases.



Most warming goes into the oceans, but that doesn't mean it's not occurring.

austranger wrote on Jun 25^th, 2014 at 8:47am:

All science predicts the earth will continue to sustain life for hundreds of millions of years. Global warming will not be the reason human life ceases to exist. Humans will certainly be the cause of our own demise but that's most likely going to be overpopulation or using up earth's natural resources. Either way, ALL of us will be dead for basically ever before that day happens. 

Few things make me chuckle more than reading the misguided thoughts of folks who still believe in man-made “Climate Change” (aka Global Warming).

These folks choose to ignore the overwhelming evidence that continues to pour in that debunks the theories of those who recklessly suggested that our planet is in grave danger.

All hail to vikaryan the messiah of climate science !

All the worlds scientists are wrong, vikaryan is the new authority
on climate science.

Someone needs notify U.N immediately about this new discovery. The  U.N needs to create a board of Climate Stabilty and appoint vikaryen as it's Chair so that he can steer the planet back onto the right path.

Sea ice extent—bah, what about volume.

Weather is very variable, a blip one year means nothing.

“Hide the decline” was not about hiding the decline in global temperatures but about some decrease in dendrochronology.

And, please this “CO2 is plant food” won’t wash:

1. As CO2 concentrations rise uptake of nitrogen slows meaning less protein is formed

2. As nights get warmer plants are less able to absorb CO2.

vikaryan wrote on Jun 25^th, 2014 at 11:30am:


Ugh. The world has not been cooling since the 1930s.

Quote:


Quote:


Another fact to note that the US is in fact, not the world. It is quite possible to have part of the world cool while still having more heat energy building up in the system overall.

TIME Magazine recently denounced skeptics in an article entitled, “Polar Vortex: Climate Change Could Be the Cause of Record Cold Weather.” Bryan Walsh wrote,

    “But not only does the cold spell not disprove climate change, it may well be that global warming could be making the occasional bout of extreme cold weather in the U.S. even more likely. Right now much of the U.S. is in the grip of a polar vortex, which is pretty much what it sounds like: a whirlwind of extremely cold, extremely dense air that forms near the poles.”

That would be, perhaps, an understandable explanation if TIME Magazine and other assorted leftist, agenda-driven journals had not already made claims to the contrary. In 1974, TIME Magazine, the same magazine that blamed the cold on global warming, blamed the cold on “global cooling.” In a June 24th, 1974, article entitled, “Another Ice Age?” the magazine claimed,

    “Scientists have found other indications of global cooling. For one thing there has been a noticeable expansion of the great belt of dry, high-altitude polar winds —the so-called circumpolar vortex—that sweep from west to east around the top and bottom of the world.”

It’s not just TIME that cherry-picks their explanations for the cold streak; with the emergences of “green” technologies and the billions of dollars being made in the field of advancing environmentally-friendly products and services, it is undeniable that there remains a strong motive for many to ensure that “global warming” or “climate change” not only exists, but that it is a man-made problem.

Remember the ship that was full of scientists who traveled to Antarctica to prove that the ice shelf there is disappearing only to get stuck in the ice that was supposedly gone? I do.

austranger wrote on Jun 25^th, 2014 at 9:07am:

You mean almost as sad as the constant cries from the so called true believers eh...  so much so they changed global warming to climate change so they could blame any weather event on AGW. 

Quote:


http://joannenova.com.au/2013/12/antarctic-ice-swallows-boat-media-spin/

Right...  Antarctica...  ice.... cold....  hmmmm. 

The irony is they got stuck in ice...  when they were warmist alarmist true believers... gotta laugh 

Dsmithy70 wrote on Jun 25^th, 2014 at 8:41am:

She's a troll, but I doubt she is much older than twelve either.

Grendel wrote on Jun 25^th, 2014 at 3:01pm:


If it's not part of a larger pattern and they do, they shouldn't.

Grendel wrote on Jun 25^th, 2014 at 3:03pm:


Have you heard anyone claiming otherwise?

I don't think anyone is saying there will be no ice in Antarctica any time soon.

vikaryan wrote on Jun 25^th, 2014 at 3:31pm:


You just post the views of the denialists but absolutely ignore any discussion on the posts you make - many of which have more errors than Al Gore.   

Why do you think anyone would listen to you?

vikaryan wrote on Jun 25^th, 2014 at 3:52pm:

According to the RSS satellite data, whose value for April 2014 is just in, the global warming trend in the 17 years 9 months since August 1996 is zero. The 212 months without global warming represents more than half the 423-month satellite data record, which began in January 1979. No one now in high school has lived through global warming.

All the global warming models and predictions were WRONG. So the theory is BS, and yet they still try to push it on us.

If I refuse to say that black is white, what exactly am I "denying"? I guess I'm denying their lies?

The terms Global Warming and Climate Change have been discarded by the alarmists because the weather wasn't following the rigged models.

That's why Obama recently coined the term "Climate Disruption" to describe the natural variations in the weather pattern. If the weather pattern changes from cold to hot, wet to dry, calm to inclement, the alarmists can rightly claim that the pattern was disrupted.

“He who controls the language controls the masses”. – Saul Alinsky in Rules for Radicals

Al Gore's movie, An Inconvenient Truth should be re titled an Inconvenient Bunch of Lies.

His movie has been completely discredited with 35 huge lies in it (last count).

Go to this link and get blown away by the breadth of Gores lies about Global Warming.

http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/monkton/

It's pretty simple really....

STOP GLOBAL WARMING!
KEEP YOUR MOUTH SHUT

STOP GLOBAL WARMING
SHUT OBAMA'S MOUTH

An excerpt of a British High Court Judgement against Al Gore in 2007.


Quote:

We now itemize 35 of the scientific errors and exaggerations in Al Gore’s movie. The first nine were listed by the judge in the High Court in London in October 2007 as being “errors.” The remaining 26 errors are just as inaccurate or exaggerated as the nine spelt out by the judge, who made it plain during the proceedings that the Court had not had time to consider more than these few errors. The judge found these errors serious enough to require the UK Government to pay substantial costs to the plaintiff.

You will find much, much more on the link:

htttp://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/monkton/

And they say that God doesn’t have a sense of humor....

I love God's sense of humor. Case in point.

A bunch of climate change (formerly global warming) scientists go to Antarctica to document the horror of ice melting from the dreaded global warming. You may have forgotten what global warming is since we haven't seen much of it in about 15 years.

So they've been there, trapped in their vessel at the South Pole in - you got it, ice - since the night of baby Jesus' birth.

Attempts by ice eating monsters failed to free them. Ultimately, they are being rescued by fossil fuel-burning helicopters. Heheheh!! 

St George of the Garden wrote on Jun 25^th, 2014 at 7:48pm:

Could it be that he talks a lot of shyt then?

red baron wrote on Jun 25^th, 2014 at 7:51pm:

All science has mistakes miss interpretations and hypothesis involved with it that's why studies never end in most scientific fields that's how we learn more has been learnt through failure than success. However how many that was 2007 seven year later lots more has been learnt about GW since then.

vikaryan wrote on Jun 25^th, 2014 at 7:56pm:



Ahh. Last time I checked we don't exactly care much about Obama.

____ wrote on Jun 25^th, 2014 at 8:57am:


I read that quote to state that, for exmaple, the remote chances of an asteroid hitting earth and wiping out human life a more credible threat than CO2. Did you have reading comprehension problems?

Oh dear, Vikaryan. You must think Australians are mugs.

vikaryan wrote on Jun 26^th, 2014 at 12:47pm:


And that explains the whole problem with trying to have this debate.  Those that don't know the difference between 'climate' and 'weather'.

This Topic was moved here from Politicians Suck by perceptions_now.

The real challenge is to avoid being led into the disastrous policy choices of those who think that only they can manage a system as complex and chaotic as the atmosphere by meddling in a system nearly as complex and chaotic – the economy.

Rather than being too worried about petro-dictators, we should perhaps save some concern for the threat of enviro-dictators, who are more likely to precipitate disaster than avoid it.

NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC was saying they are doing a map on muti-year ice but some contend it may be misleading...

What, possibly from other sources, is the story with multi-year ice in the arctic?

YouTube: Dr Don Easterbrook Exposes Climate Change Hoax

In March 2013, Don Easterbrook testified at a hearing in Washington state. He very carefully and professionally exposed the climate change hoax called global warming.

This was exactly one year before the United Nations published its 2,500-page report on global warming. This report took five years to prepare and all with opposing view were excluded from the effort. The half of the scientific community that opposed this concept were shut out.

In addition, there has not been a single objection to this hoax anywhere in the media in the month since it has been released. I believe this is political censorship.

More than 23,000 have viewed this 90-minute hearing. There are 406 comments listed. Add your own.

Most of the 8 billion folks on the planet should view this one. Why?

The secret agenda is to impose a world energy tax to provide the funds needed to fight global warming. The bonus is that the world powers would collect funds to try to conquer global cooling. A new little ice age ...... 206-year cycle.

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jun 26^th, 2014 at 4:09pm:



You did know NSIDC is sponsored by NASA didn't you.
Being  a government body run by uber Green Obama. Governments
don't lie to us do they?

"GLOBAL WARMING IS A HOAX" - YouTube
Lenar Whitney

In a move sure to inflame the left, a Republican congressional candidate in Louisiana is releasing a nearly five-minute long video railing against liberals and calling global warming a “hoax” that might be “the greatest deception in the history of mankind.”

The video comes from candidate Lenar Whitney, who is running as a Republican in the crowded Sixth Congressional District race in the state.

“A spectre is haunting America,” Whitney says in the video. “It is perhaps the greatest deception in the history of mankind. It has been almost 10 years since failed presidential candidate Al Gore put out his propaganda film, ‘The Inconvenient Truth,’ proclaiming that the actions of America’s energy industry are causing a catastrophic rise in the earth’s temperature.”

“But quite inconveniently for Al Gore,” Whitney continued, “and for the rest of the politicians who continue to advance this delusion, any 10-year-old can invalidate their thesis with one of the simplest scientific devices known to man: a thermometer.”

Talking about Gore, Whitney adds: “The earth has done nothing but get colder each year since the film’s release.”

austranger wrote on Jun 27^th, 2014 at 12:04pm:



I see you quote SKS as an authority. It seems strange that Kevin Trenberth  seems to rate WUWT and not SKS on his media page,

It that because SKS is not 'media' enough? Not 'Sciencey' enough? Or something else?

http://www.cgd.ucar.edu/staff/trenbert/media.html

I laugh at people who believe theres a "man made global warming crisis".

I certainly don't believe it and have NEVER had to stress about it.

So to all you gullibles out there who have been so easily brainwashed by the media don't stress too hard now. 

Friday, June 27, 2014

Laramie Boomerang

Fact: People believe what they want to believe. The hysteria that has been created over carbon and greenhouse gas emissions and the current and future effects is more hypothesis and theory than truth.

Fact: The earth has always created its own carbon emissions, ex. volcanoes, wild fire, and rotting vegetation just to name a few and does so for its ability to sustain the life upon it. Is too much of a good thing bad? Maybe or maybe not, but probably.

Fact: The world’s population is now at 7.2 billion people, was at 3 billion in 1950 and is projected to be 8 billion in ten years. Of the 7.2 billion, 4.4 percent live in the U.S.A., 19 percent in China and 17.4 percent in India. My point here is the fact that it appears we are the only county, or one of very few countries that is concerned with emissions and climate change. Maybe if we can show them the profit of becoming involved with our emissions credit scam they will get onboard.

Fact: Money talks. If not, I believe it’s a battle we can’t win. As for global warming (climate change ) I’m pretty sure this planet can handle it. She’s been through earthquakes, floods, drought, volcanoes, plate tectonics, continental drift and solar storms. She’s suffered many hits by comets, meteors and asteroids. Oh, and climate change more times than we could ever count. We as temporary inhabitants of this world can only destroy the life upon it including ourselves. Maybe once mother Earth has had her fill of garbage, plastic, alloys and chemicals produced by man, she will just shake us off like a bad case of fleas. It’s time to get busy living or get busy dying. Be good, and live happy.

L G Martin

Laramie

MOTR wrote on Jun 28^th, 2014 at 1:52pm:




Funny how the loon talks about data and ignores it to promote his own talks.
That was funny, like watching a cult video. Check this one out its hilarious.

Is there anything Monkcton has claimed that you've checked and on which you're prepared to stake your own credibility?

austranger wrote on Jun 28^th, 2014 at 4:23pm:


Lol  the old reverse Denier claim.
I bet its real hot in your widdle world where Global warming has been heating you up for the past 17 years.

You guys are a laugh. The only Deniers are yourselves.
I hope you don't have smart children who look up to you.

God help you both if a satellite carrying the data slammed into your house  .

Earth has not been heating the past 17 years. 

I feel sorry for people like you that need to make stuff up and live off conspiracy sites.

ian wrote on Jun 28^th, 2014 at 8:25pm:


You can doubt what you want, no skin off my nose.

You might just only be  getting hot under the collar there ian.