Hey Viky, using huge pix and letters only proves you're desperate, give it a rest, OK?
You can post all the denialist crud you want, it won't change the science.
The only viable question is whether humanity has contributed to the GW, the fact that it is happening is well established, whatever the cause.
Personally, I find that a moot question, we should be preparing to cope with the changes looming rather than wasting time and resources  attempting to halt the inevitable.

vikaryan wrote on Jun 25^th, 2014 at 10:04am:


Witt letter: ‘Believing the climate change hoax’
Sunday, June 15, 2014

Laramie Boomerang

I find it absolutely amazing and depressing that there are still people out there believing the climate change hoax.

I think most reasonable people would agree that Al Gore and his movie “An Inconvenient Truth” was the catalyst that got things rolling and gave the movement a lot of energy. In 2007 Al Gore had his day in court. A British court said this: “An Inconvenient Truth” contains at least 11 material falsehoods.”

The 97 percent of scientists agreeing about climate change is a myth; it was based on an anonymous survey of thousands of scientists which was whittled down to about 75. The supposed leading authority on this issue has been The UN’s IPCC.

Since the very beginning, their predictions and climate models on temperatures, water levels and ice loss have been wrong. Their scientists have had to apologize for withholding contradictory information, misleading hockey stick graphs and are still in litigation about withheld emails.

The Earth has been around for billions of years, experiencing climate changes big and small, loud and quiet. Yet for some reason, with the miniscule amount of time we have been walking around on this planet, we are still supposed to be responsible for the climate; it defies common sense.

The amount of ingenuity, creativity and flat out brain power it takes to find, extract and produce energy in this country is an amazing feat which should be applauded and admired. The energy companies and the people they have working for them provide us with heat, transportation, defense, electricity and food on our shelves. We have the cleanest water and air we have had in decades and live in the most prosperous and free country ever.

Yet there are some people who just don’t care about the negative effects cap and trade type laws will have on not only us, but the disastrous effects it will have on people in developing and poverty stricken countries. Apparently the smug congratulations and air of superiority they feel with their fellow pseudo-intellectuals and wannabe-hippies is what’s really important in life.

Joseph Witt

Laramie

Better, but still excessive.

And wrong by the way.
Credible basically means believable, you're using it to mean "buyable", as in only those whose "scientific opinions" are readily bought are disputing the science, you really should do basic homework before you accept such tripe as factual.
I'm done with this now, duty calls, so you go and check the credentials and histories of those you quote, that should open your eyes.
Bye   

The U.N. panel on climate change has made exaggerated claims on climate change for years and have admitted their initial reports on climate change were meant to be alarming and not factual. The fact is the global temperature has not changed a single degree in 17.9 years!

Obama made one of the most ignorant statements in his State of the Union address when he said "the debate over climate change is settled" Only a fool would claim any science is final. What he meant was "I'm tired of anyone challenging my belief so therefore I say it is so." All hail the king! John Kerry recently said, "What is the worst thing that could happen if we are wrong about climate change." Well, we could ruin the economy, but not for those who profit off the industry like Al Gore), you could destroy many business that can not comply to new standards and finally you could imprison people for violating a law that is later found to be unjust and unnecessary.

vikaryan wrote on Jun 25^th, 2014 at 10:22am:

( ... Graphing courtesy of Photo Bucket Global Warming Trends)

http://i978.photobucket.com/albums/ae269/oldpom/clip_image002.png[/i][/b]

The hiatus period of 17 years 9 months is the farthest back one can go in the RSS satellite temperature record and still show a zero trend. But the length of the pause in global warming, significant though it now is, is of less importance than the ever-growing discrepancy between the temperature trends predicted by models and the less exciting real-world temperature change that has been observed.

( ... TEXT - © What's Up With That Climate)

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/06/04/the-pause-continues-still-no-global-warmin...

* ... Rupert's British version of Andrew Bolt




Quote:

.

Why the Mail on Sunday was wrong to claim global warming has stopped

Newspaper's claim that 'world stopped getting warmer almost 16 years ago' is simply wrong, says Met Office

Wednesday 17 October 2012

The British newspaper the Mail on Sunday and its writer David Rose are notorious for publishing misleading (at best) climate-related articles. 
They have recently struck again, claiming that according to a "quietly released" Met Office report, global warming stopped 16 years ago.  This assertion is

entirely fabricated

, as the Met Office explains


http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2012/oct/16/daily-mail-global-warming-sto...

http://www.giss.nasa.gov/research/news/20110113/

vikaryan wrote on Jun 25^th, 2014 at 11:00am:

vikaryan wrote on Jun 25^th, 2014 at 11:00am:


The problem is the overwhelming evidence is actually in favour of AGW - it's not just the UN, it is every single climate body in the world.

In fact the general public is less likely than scientists to accept the evidence, and scientists are those in a much better position to evaluate it.

Why

has Al Gore — the poster child for Climate Alarmists — turned down every opportunity to debate his claims with those who oppose them? It’s because his claims have been proven to be false.