The Global Warming hoax is real

 

Re: "Icebound Antarctic ship awaits helicopter rescue," The Denver Post, Dec. 30, 2013. 

There is a little bit of sweet schadenfreude in the plight of the ice-bound Russian ship. The passengers, apparently a group of climate scientists and eco-tourists, were presumably seeking to verify the shrinking south polar ice cap. After being trapped by, wait for it, ice and ignominiously airlifted to safety, they will all return home to affirm their religious beliefs of man-made global warming. Oh, by the way, this was summer in the southern hemisphere.

The Democrat global warming hoax cannot explain the deep freeze the world is now going through and the global warming lunatics stuck in the ice on those ships at the South Pole where it was summer down there.

The world has been warming and cooling for millions of years. Man has nothing to do with the weather. Very sad when people fall prey to such nonsense as is global warming.

This idea of human-induced global warming is the greatest hoax ever perpetrated in human history. In reality, it is nothing but a fraud, a get-rich-quick scheme for climate scientists on government grants and washed-up politicians like Al Gore.

If Al Gore and his ilk were right with these outrageous claims in the 1990s, Miami and New Orleans would be 20 feet under water right now. Why doesn’t anybody ever hold these zealots accountable for their idiotic predictions?

These zealots have done enough damage to our country. Their paranoia has led to our dependence on Middle Eastern oil, which has resulted in funding of Muslim extremists whose top priority in life is to kill us.

A prominent scientist and former NASA researcher challenges the “scientific fact” that manmade carbon emissions are causing global warming. Leslie Woodcock is a professor emeritus of chemical thermodynamics at the University of Manchester in England.  He has stated that “The theory is that CO2 emitted by burning fossil fuel is an unsubstantiated hypothesis.” Many of today’s global warming scientists have a political and commercial interest in perpetuating this false premise. Our government through its research grants has a significant impact on the thinking of these “warming scientists.” He goes on to say, “it’s become almost an industry, as a consequence of this professional misconduct by government advisors around the world.” Interestingly, there are instruments that exist that measure the ocean temperatures around the world (ARGO Buoy System with 3,200 buoys) that do not support the earth warming theory. Additionally, the ERBC satellites data has shown that as the earth’s surface periodically warms, it gives off more heat. This is in direct opposition to the climate change models that predict a runaway condition. The climate change propaganda is a hoax. Do your own research as I have.

Conservatives (i.e. right-wingers) trust proven scientific facts and theory, not artificial intelligence of computers programmed to report imaginary results to support a predetermined agenda.

The IPCC report published in 2007 reported that developing countries would need $100 billion a year to implement green politics. Based on crass science, man-made climate change has grown into an industry of interest groups, lobbyists, litigators, impact assessors, bureaucratic mobs and liberal politicians who take advantage of the gullible for their $100 billion.

IPCC also reported that the Himalayan glaciers would disappear by 2035. The United Kingdom climate scientists squelched any dissent from scientific researchers who disagreed with them. Do we hear any comment from the United Nations on the report by a group of scientists from The Heartland Institute in Chicago The Heartland Institute released a 1,062-page report, which found that higher carbon dioxide concentrations and rising temperatures are causing “no net harm to the global environment or to human health.”

The institute also found that increasing carbon dioxide levels produces a beneficial effect on plants including important food crops and to animals and human health.

The thinking of global warming alarmism is comparable to a crazy guy heading full steam ahead over a cliff while putting all his attention on trying to correct bad radio reception.

There are a number of threats many times more serious than an increase in the plant fertilizer - CO2. Here are some.

(1) The threat of an asteroid. The question is not if, but when this will happen. In the past an asteroid wiped out about 90 percent of life on earth, and another hit could destroy the human race.

(2) A solar flare. Again, the question is not if, but when. In 1859 we were hit by one that knocked out telegraph systems all over America and Europe. We are totally unprepared for another event like this, which would create chaos and destruction.

(3) A magnetic pulse created by an atomic explosion in our atmosphere by a rogue nation would produce similar results.

(4) Nuclear missiles headed our way. This can be overcome by a missile defense envisioned by Reagan.

Future generations will look back on our judgment, and by comparison the flat-earth people of the Middle Ages will look pretty good.

The New American, 24 June 2014

Global-warming Hoax Unraveling — Someone Tell Obama
by Selwyn Duke: 

The global-warming agenda is increasingly being revealed for the scam it is. There was the Climategate scandal of 2009, in which “scientists” at the University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit were conspiring to suppress data that contradicted their global-warming agenda; there was the British judge who ruled, in a lawsuit to ban Al Gore’s film An Inconvenient Truth from UK government schools, that the movie contained nine significant errors; there was the revelation that the claim that 97 percent of scientists agreed with the AGW (man-caused global warming) thesis was bunk. Now a mainstream publication, the UK’s Telegraph, has published a scathing denunciation of warmist propaganda.

Citing information from Steven Goddard’s blog Real Science, Christopher Booker writes:

Quote:


Booker also asks what it means when a theory has to be promoted with continual “fudging” of the data. Is it science at all? Perhaps, however, he has those English manners that preclude one from saying what I, in my colonial brashness, will put bluntly: these so-called scientists aren’t merely “fudging.”

They’re lying.

If they were Pinocchio, their collective nose would be the size of our national debt. If they were shepherds, they could be a whole boys’ school that cried wolf. Despite this, Western pseudo-elites are still running around like Chicken Little.

For example, while Iraq becomes an Islamic state, Russia moves on Ukraine, China angles to be the world’s hegemon, and the United States is in moral freefall, Barack Obama gives a commencement speech at the University of California, Irvine, condemning climate-change “deniers” (translation: people in touch with reality). He also recently commended New Zealand prime minister John Key for being a fellow Chicken Little in his “crusade” against climate change, and Obama’s EPA continues to unconstitutionally enforce regulations designed to reduce carbon emissions, even though calling CO2 “carbon” is a lot like calling H2O “hydrogen.”

Of course, Obama and Key have much company in their hen house. Former treasury secretary Hank Paulson, for instance, recently wrote the following in the New York Times (hat tip: Thomas Lifson):

Quote:


Yes, act now, think later. Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain!

The irony of this is that even if the AGW thesis were correct, there would be little we could do about it. First, China and India — which together boast 36 percent of the world’s population — are rapidly building coal-fired power plants. Any Western reduction in CO2 will be dwarfed by these behemoths’ increases alone. Add to this other CO2-happy developing nations and Russia, and the fruitlessness of the uniquely Western climate-change obsession becomes apparent.

Second, there are scientists who believe that AGW is a reality, but said long ago that it was too late to do anything about it, anyway. So are we cooked? Now the good news.

Whatever the cause, there’s no reason to be afraid of the big bad climate change.

Not if it’s in the direction of rising mercury, that is.

Contrary to the doom-and-gloom rhetoric, it seems a warmer planet’s benefits far outweigh its downsides. Like eating? Note that greater temperatures probably mean more arable land. In addition, higher CO2 levels increase plant yields 30-plus percent across species; this begets better crops. This is why botanists pump the gas into their greenhouses, mind you. It’s why the age of the dinosaurs was one of dense foliage — CO2 levels were five to 10 times what they are today. The gas is not a pollutant. It’s plant food.

The New American, 24 June 2014

Global-warming Hoax Unraveling — Someone Tell Obama
by Selwyn Duke: 

Moreover, as the aforementioned Jurassic CO2 levels indicate, climate change is not unprecedented. There was a time when the waters surrounding Florida were 300 feet lower and another when they were 100 feet higher. The Earth was completely or almost completely covered with snow and ice during the Cryogenian period while during another time the snow and ice were virtually gone. There have been four or five major ice ages and numerous minor ones; there are 100,000-year glacial periods followed by 12,000-year interglacials (approximations) and 1,500-year cycles of heating and cooling within them. Climate is no more stable than are people.

Speaking of which, there’s a philosophical point to be made here. The liberal climate alarmists are the first to say that humans are just animals, just part of nature like an amoeba. If this is true, however, wouldn’t we then just be another “natural” factor in naturally occurring climate change?

At most, though, we appear a negligible factor. This raises a question: Why won’t Obama, Gore, Paulson, and the other Chicken Littles fly the coop of climate fear?

One reason is that everyone needs something to give his life meaning, and, absent true faith, an environmental crusade in Gaia’s name perhaps best fits the bill. This means that, for some, leaving the Church of Warmism is like a jihadist leaving Islam. Related to this is that when you’ve devoted a good part of your life and your passion and energy to a cause, it’s hard to admit you’re wrong.

But there’s another reason. Many individuals and companies, such as those producing ethanol, are profiting via doomsday prophesying. For instance, Al Gore — perhaps one of history’s most shameless con-men — “could become [the] world's first carbon billionaire,” reported The Telegraph in 2009. This, not to mention all the climate-change grants governments give malleable scientists for “research.”

What this means is that, despite its unraveling, the climate-change con will be around for a while longer. But driven by a combination of naiveté (gullible followers), envy, and cash, at least we can say that the “green” movement has certainly earned its name.

Quote:


So the denialist admit ACW is a threat

Thats a good beginning point.

Which denialists agree co2 is a threat and which don't?

vikaryan wrote on Jun 25^th, 2014 at 8:48am:


I don't think anyone is really disputing these things, they are not relevant to current discussion. Yes, the climate has changed in the past.

vikaryan wrote on Jun 25^th, 2014 at 8:48am:


The behaviour leading to it is the same no matter what label you use as are the consequences.

vikaryan wrote on Jun 25^th, 2014 at 8:48am:


A point, based on nothing. Just stated. What of all the evidence that says otherwise?

vikaryan wrote on Jun 25^th, 2014 at 8:48am:


So accusations, and still no evidence, just calling people wrong.

vikaryan wrote on Jun 25^th, 2014 at 8:48am:


Really. Economic benefit? I'm sure the big carbon produces have no vested interest and exert little political pressure 

vikaryan wrote on Jun 25^th, 2014 at 8:48am:


Because nothing is unravelling, and this piece sure hasn't provided any evidence at all.

austranger wrote on Jun 25^th, 2014 at 8:47am:


You mean wild swings in weather that may cause treacherous driving conditions for Learner drivers???

Telegraph.co.uk-21 Jun 2014

The US has actually been cooling since the Thirties, the hottest decade on record

By Christopher Booker
4:04PM BST 21 Jun 2014

Quote:

The idea that AGW could be a hoax is ludicrous in the extreme. That so many people would participate and willfully hide the truth for near no benefit against powerful opponents defies rationality.