Yadda wrote on Jul 4^th, 2014 at 7:28pm:


No, that is the mistaken misconstruing you are deliberately using to twist my post to your own sick, disgusting purpose!

My post is declaring that continuous attack goes beyond mere criticism into the field of persecution and we have seen where religious persecution invariably leads.  Into the ovens for people who's only supposed crime is that they believe and worshipped a different god to persecutors like you and Soren! 

Now run along back to your psych unit, I'm sure the Nurse will be upset to find you misusing her computer terminal again to post inflammatory messages in crayon!   

Quote:


more than 1 a month. deport the entire families, all 17 of the kids, all 3 wives .........

Soren wrote on Jul 8^th, 2014 at 1:28pm:


Ultimately the basis of anti-Semitism is that of the religious belief that the Jews were responsible for the death of Christ.  The Holocaust was the ultimate expression of anti-Semitism.  Other groups were victims but the real aim was elimination of the Jews.

Quote:



Still trying to defend the indefensible, I see.  Now an apologist for the Nazis!  How disgusting!   

Soren wrote on Jul 8^th, 2014 at 3:01pm:


Still trying to defend the indefensible, I see!   

Religious persecutor!  Just because Muslims worship a different god, you want to persecute them.  You make no effort to differentiate between moderate and extremist Muslims, between innocent and guilty!  It's all just the same to you, all Muslims are bad!  Stop trying to obfuscate and dissemble!   

Back on the wacky-baccy I see, Soren.  Keep it, up, it shows a different side to you!   

The dark side of 'multiculturalism' exposed even in second-generation immigrants.

It's the activist Islamites who carry the religious violence gene that make the passive Muslims irrelevant as proof of Islam being compatible with Western values.

link

******

And then ...

"Avoiding shining a light on Islamic child sexual abuse is tantamount to granting it tacit approval and renders the Royal Commission a hypocritical farce".

"The terms of reference of the Royal Commission into Child Sexual Abuse are broad-ranging and almost without parameters. It has now turned its attention to swimming coaches after having ripped into every religious sect exposing paedophilia.

Even Cardinal Pell was called as a witness before scampering off to his pre-arranged Vatican “adviser on how to limit payouts” position. Many of the guilty are dead and can’t say sorry, most of the living are still out there avoiding penalty.

Yet the Islamic community, the real practitioners of entrenched child sexual abuse in Australia, remains untouched. No explanation necessary, no witnesses called, no complainants? Is the vile cult of Islam a protected species excused from Royal Commissions? It seems so.

After being betrothed to a female infant, a Muslim man is permitted to sexually gratify himself using the well-known practice of “thighing” where he thrusts his penis between the infant’s legs until he ejaculates. He can penetrate her as soon as she reaches the age of nine. Compulsory clitoral amputation is performed at any time in between.

These abominations are practised now in Australia, hidden within closed Islamic communities. Are some “religions” immune from investigation and prosecution? Are Australian Islamic children less important than Australian Christian children?"

link

The resentment felt by certain immigrants of 'colour' towards the white indigenous people once again reveals itself in the form of violence.

"A young woman told how she was punched by a rogue taxi driver who then left her and a friend stranded and alone.

This one sentence alone immediately prompts one to suspect it's one of The Usual Suspects ... which proves to be correct on further reading.

How can this be? Why is the stereotype proved again and again with such monotonous consistency?

And why is the UK and Australia's taxi industry dominated by little brown men who hate our white credentials, and who are so often dragged into court for violence and molestation of their Anglo women passengers?

link

MumboJumbo wrote on Aug 13^th, 2014 at 8:38pm:


Bullshit.

The reason is nepotism. A couple of Arabs or subcontinentals get into an industry like taxi-driving and before you know it they've persuaded the boss to hire their cousins, nephews, uncles, brothers, brothers-in-law and the village postman from the Old Country.

I saw this phenomenon 'close-up-and-personal' in Sydney's manufacturing industries. Australians were queuing up at Centrelink to be told there wasn't any work, with meanwhile streams of Middle Eastern and other migrants were bypassing the usual JobSearch processes and going straight to factory doors.

It was the biggest swindle on Anglo-Australians I ever witnessed in all my years here.

And the catchphrase has always been ... "Oh, but Australians/Brits won't take these jobs!"

In some cases I agree with this ~ but for the most part our successive governments have been desperate to get new immigrants and refugees off the dole and into the workforce even if this means sidelining Australians.

And I'm sure it's still happening since I left the workforce.