Grendel wrote on May 1
st, 2014 at 7:45pm:
St George of the Garden wrote on May 1
st, 2014 at 7:38pm:
Garbage as usual from roach. There is no indication business would hire more people. US has a low minimum wage, unemployment there is what, roach, 7% you said? Idiot!
I didn't say any such thing are you lying about me and what I say and think yet again?
How unusual for you eh.

BTW we are not the US.
And more people in work means more spending and tax etc, etc, etc.... the exact figures neither of us would know and I'm not going to make psychic claims about things like you do all over the place.

Oh and if you want to see garbage start reading your own posts, heaven knows you refuse to read other people's.
We can get more people into work by reducing the standard working week to 35 hours a week.
maybe but some companies burn out employees trying to get the same work done in less time. or paying a select few OT to achieve it.
In any case, it is a lie to assert that government policy is ever about creating enough jobs to go around.
yet I didn't right?
Australia hasn't had full employment (unemployment below 2%) for 40 years and won't ever have full employment again.
Agree
The only way we can change that is a fundamental policy shift of no longer allowing the RBA to force people out of work whenever the unemployment rate reduces to 4%.
The RBA inflation point was selected at random... instead of it being so low it should be a tad higher. Say 5%.