So we have drug resistances bacteria and mr abbott is

- setting up financial resistance for people to visit doctors via his great big new doctor tax.

- opening our market to dumping from his so called "free trade deals' of food full of antibiotics which will weaken the population further.



Why is abbott out to undermine the health of Australians ... and why do cons support him in this?

Is his agenda an epidemic and crash in the country's population?

EMMA ALBERICI, PRESENTER: Specialists in infectious diseases are raising concerns about the potential for drug-resistant bacteria to slip through Australia's borders. Currently there are no food standards covering superbugs in either domestic or imported foods and some experts are warning of dire consequences. This report from Jason Om; the producer, Candice Talberg.

JASOM OM, REPORTER: Superbugs are a doctor's worst nightmare. They're bacteria that refuse to die. But the more antibiotics are used, the stronger their resistance grows.

The problem is having a direct effect at Melbourne's Austin Hospital, where Professor Lindsay Grayson is seeing more cases of superbug infections.

LINDSAY GRAYSON, AUSTIN HOSPITAL: We have a number of very suspicious cases where patients, people who've never been out of Australia and the only way - yet they've come in with superbug infections. They haven't been taking antibiotics and yet they've got this superbug in their blood or in their urinary tract or whatever. And so it makes us worried that the only way they could have picked that up is through food.

JASOM OM: Resistant staph has long been a problem in hospitals, but doctors are now becoming concerned about infections from superbugs in food. Often it's Australian travellers who return home and have fallen victim. It's led infectious disease experts to believe that imported food could also pose a problem.

LINDSAY GRAYSON: The tsunami which is sort of on the horizon is this growing use of antibiotics in food production overseas, largely uncontrolled.

JASOM OM: Antibiotic use in food production and the resistance it creates is a global concern. America's Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says antibiotics use to promote growth in food-producing animals should be phased out.

more here

http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/content/2013/s3905303.htm

So what protection did the cons put in these so called free trade deals ... have we got the right to stop food full of antibiotics or did Abbott sell the countries health out for a news headline.

Did Abbott sign a free trade agreement with the meteorite to allow it to destroy Australian society ... if not, what is the connection to abbott allowing our food chain to be flooded with antibiotics ... abbott putting doctors out of the reach of the financially challenged?

____ wrote on May 1^st, 2014 at 7:20am:


Getting more retarded every day.

Armchair_Politician wrote on May 1^st, 2014 at 9:34am:

That is not refuting what I posted.

FTAs are a bit more serious than some selfies FFS!

If someone puts off going to the quack then an infection has the time it needs to really take hold. Pretty elementary.

The $6 is not for helping the health system, it is the first step in destroying Medicare.

St George of the Garden wrote on May 1^st, 2014 at 9:52am:


Oh no, it can get more retarded.....

King FriYAY II wrote on May 1^st, 2014 at 9:57am:


Once Wayne Swan's $400bn+ debt is reduced substantially (along with the associated interest payments), there will be no need for this fee and the money saved on interest alone can be used to provide more funding for health, schools, roads, etc. Money spent on paying off a debt is money wasted that could be used on services instead. Only a retard such as yourself could not comprehend such simplicity.