Australian Politics Forum - 66,000 female genital Muslim mutilations in the UK

FD Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 100150	Re: 66,000 female genital Muslim mutilations in the UK Reply #45 - Mar 22^nd, 2014 at 2:46pm freediver wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2014 at 2:43pm: Before you started shrieking about legalising pedophilia, did you bother trying to understand why it is illegal? Before you became Ray Hadley, did you bother to read the words of said posts?
Back to top	IP Logged

FD Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 100150	Re: 66,000 female genital Muslim mutilations in the UK Reply #46 - Mar 22^nd, 2014 at 2:54pm I’m sorry, FD, I really shouldn’t be so cruel. You don’t have time.
Back to top	IP Logged

freediver Gold Member Offline www.ozpolitic.com Posts: 51899 At my desk.	Re: 66,000 female genital Muslim mutilations in the UK Reply #47 - Mar 22^nd, 2014 at 3:00pm I read it. You built a case for legalising pedophilia by ignoring the reason it is banned. I think every Muslim was convinced by it.
Back to top	People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words. IP Logged

FD

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 100150

Re: 66,000 female genital Muslim mutilations in the UK
Reply #48 - Mar 22^nd, 2014 at 3:08pm

freediver wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2014 at 3:00pm:

I read it. You built a case for legalising pedophilia by ignoring the reason it is banned. I think every Muslim was convinced by it.

Did you read the part about replacing the age of consent with specific criteria for abuse being the argument of experts in the field of child sexual.abuse?

Sorry, FD, you couldn’t. You don’t bother with non-Moslem texts. You prefer to focus on the example of Muhammed.

Allah Uakbar, no?

Back to top

IP Logged

FD Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 100150	Re: 66,000 female genital Muslim mutilations in the UK Reply #49 - Mar 22^nd, 2014 at 3:17pm Sorry to get academic, FD, but the punchline in your joke is that banning underage defacto relationships makes them go away. But when they’re presented to you as Muselman statistics, well. It’s an epidemic of paedophilia. If it was up to me, FD, you’d get the award. Pure comedy gold.
Back to top	IP Logged

FD

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 100150

Re: 66,000 female genital Muslim mutilations in the UK
Reply #50 - Mar 22^nd, 2014 at 3:20pm

Lord Herbert wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2014 at 2:38pm:

FD wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2014 at 2:36pm:

Gee, TV, the guillotine, deep-fried Mars bars...

We’re an enterprising lot, you know.

Mind you, we never got around to the stick. Your Australian Aborigine beat us to it by 40,000 years.

Never mind the waffle ~ just answer FD's question.

FD’s left the room, Herbie. Are you going to resume the interview?

Back to top

IP Logged

ian

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 9451

Re: 66,000 female genital Muslim mutilations in the UK
Reply #51 - Mar 22^nd, 2014 at 3:53pm

Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2014 at 2:27pm:

ian wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2014 at 2:22pm:

Winstons question has not been answered, he asked "what would it entail" no one has answered the question yet.

It has been answered, read the 2 links i put in post #30 from an Islamic scholar.

Incorrect. That link does not show how these FGM's were carried out. Not sure if you have a comprehension problem so I will state this again for the record. Female genital mutilation is not necassarily female genital circumcision, sometimes the clitoris is cut out, in other operations it is not. sometimes the clitoris is only nicked symbolically. so winstons question remains unanswered.

Back to top

IP Logged

Baronvonrort

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20153
Gender: male

Re: 66,000 female genital Muslim mutilations in the UK
Reply #52 - Mar 22^nd, 2014 at 6:33pm

ian wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2014 at 3:53pm:

Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2014 at 2:27pm:

ian wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2014 at 2:22pm:

Winstons question has not been answered, he asked "what would it entail" no one has answered the question yet.

It has been answered, read the 2 links i put in post #30 from an Islamic scholar.

Incorrect. That link does not show how these FGM's were carried out. Not sure if you have a comprehension problem so I will state this again for the record. Female genital mutilation is not necassarily female genital circumcision, sometimes the clitoris is cut out, in other operations it is not. sometimes the clitoris is only nicked symbolically. so winstons question remains unanswered.

It has been answered, there are no diagrams in the Islamic texts on how to do FGM,would you like muslims to make a video instructing people how to mutilate genitals?

From one link which you could not comprehend-
Quote:

Circumcision reduces excessive sensitivity of the clitoris which may cause it to increase in size which is annoying to the husband at time of intercourse.

Another benefit of circumcision is that it prevents stimulation of the clitoris which makes it grow large in such a manner it causes pain.

Circumcision reduces excessive sexual desire.

It takes away excessive libido from women.
islamqa.info/en/45528

Sheik Munajid spelled out what FGM does to women, Islamic apologists like you are morally bankrupt in what you defend.

Islam is a political ideology as well as a delusional religion, muslims have the honesty of a used car salesman combined with a politician when selling their horse manure.

Nicked symbolically downplays the reality of this barbaric practice, they tried to sell it to the medical profession as a ritual nick to get doctors to perform this for them.
Quote:

The college for Australia's obstetricians and gynacologists says it does not support the ritual nicking of young muslim girls and anyone suspected of performing such genital mutilation should be reported to authorities.

The college does not support female genital mutilation full stop,Dr Weaver told AAP.

This ritual nicking, as it has been called,has been put forward as a way of satisfying cultural sensitivities but we do not support that either.
news.theage.com.au/breaking-news-national/doctors-dont-support-ritual-nicking-20...

Ritual nicking is a politically correct way of asking for female genital mutilation to be allowed.

Back to top

Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it.

IP Logged

ian

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 9451

Re: 66,000 female genital Muslim mutilations in the UK
Reply #53 - Mar 22^nd, 2014 at 6:40pm

Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2014 at 6:33pm:

[

It has been answered, there are no diagrams in the Islamic texts on how to do FGM,would you like muslims to make a video instructing people how to mutilate genitals?

Took you a while, but at least you were the first one to get there. I also do not defend FGM, not sure where you got that idea from.

Back to top

IP Logged

freediver

Gold Member

Offline

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 51899
At my desk.

Re: 66,000 female genital Muslim mutilations in the UK
Reply #54 - Mar 22^nd, 2014 at 6:44pm

Quote:

Did you read the part about replacing the age of consent with specific criteria for abuse being the argument of experts in the field of child sexual.abuse?

I read the bit about you replacing it with the adult criteria. This is effectively what happens now, with a jude's consent required for borderline cases.

Quote:

Sorry to get academic, FD, but the punchline in your joke is that banning underage defacto relationships makes them go away.

Exactly. Just like banning murder means there is no more murder.

Quote:

sometimes the clitoris is only nicked symbolically

Nice. Just like Muslims remove the head of people who criticise Islam, as a symbol of their devotion.

Back to top

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.

IP Logged

ian Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 9451	Re: 66,000 female genital Muslim mutilations in the UK Reply #55 - Mar 22^nd, 2014 at 6:46pm yes, a ritual nicking is exactly like executing someone by beheading.
Back to top	IP Logged

freediver Gold Member Offline www.ozpolitic.com Posts: 51899 At my desk.	Re: 66,000 female genital Muslim mutilations in the UK Reply #56 - Mar 22^nd, 2014 at 6:52pm At least both are now illegal - at least until the apologists like you get their way.
Back to top	People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words. IP Logged

Lord Herbert

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 34441
Gender: male

Re: 66,000 female genital Muslim mutilations in the UK
Reply #57 - Mar 22^nd, 2014 at 7:05pm

FD wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2014 at 2:45pm:

Lord Herbert wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2014 at 2:38pm:

FD wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2014 at 2:36pm:

Gee, TV, the guillotine, deep-fried Mars bars...

We’re an enterprising lot, you know.

Mind you, we never got around to the stick. Your Australian Aborigine beat us to it by 40,000 years.

Never mind the waffle ~ just answer FD's question.

And here’s the cop with the telephone book - the one without the sense of humour.

You can run butt you can't hide.

You have two questions to answer now.

#2: Quote:

Before you started shrieking about legalising pedophilia, did you bother trying to understand why it is illegal?

Back to top

IP Logged

Lord Herbert

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 34441
Gender: male

Re: 66,000 female genital Muslim mutilations in the UK
Reply #58 - Mar 22^nd, 2014 at 7:15pm

Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2014 at 6:33pm:

Ritual nicking is a politically correct way of asking for female genital mutilation to be allowed.

'Nicking' ~ what an utterly disgusting euphemism for an act of Islamic ritual butchery that profoundly handicaps the sexual enjoyment of women who have been the victim of this childish idiocy that's designed to keep a woman from 'straying' from her husband.

Back to top

IP Logged

ian

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 9451

Re: 66,000 female genital Muslim mutilations in the UK
Reply #59 - Mar 22^nd, 2014 at 7:31pm

freediver wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2014 at 6:52pm:

At least both are now illegal - at least until the apologists like you get their way.

Lol, how can I possibly be an apologist for something you nor anyone else are able to define? You condemn the practise but are unable to describe exactly what the practise entails.

Back to top

IP Logged