ok lets try again

rebut these facts here lets see if you can do it ,

rather than dancing around like a punch drunk inebriated booze hound

https://climateviewer.com/2015/03/15/aluminum-barium-and-chemtrails-explained-ju...

#1 There’s Barium and Aluminum in the Chemtrails

True.

Atmospheric Aluminum A2O3

The predominate source of anthropogenic aluminum in rain and soil samples are raining down from space, blame the rockets:

Each time a space shuttle is launched, the solid rocket boosters release 240 tons of HCl gas, 26 tons of chlorine gas, 7 tons of nitrogen dioxide gas, and 304 tons of aluminum oxide into the atmosphere.  The resulting hydrochloric acid dissolves eight inches of concrete on the launch pad, raises the concentration of hydrochloric acid in nearby lakes to 3 M, produces massive fish kills in the ocean, and destroys the paint on cars.  Leading chemists believe that the HCl is a major contributor to the holes in the ozone layer.
source, see also: Space Shuttle Exhausted Aluminum Oxide’ A Measured Particle Size Distribution W. R. COFER III AND G. C. PURGOLD Atmospheric Sciences Division, NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia E. L. WINSTEAD ST Systems Corporation, Hampton, Virginia R. A. EDAHL Materials Division, NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia  1991

That’s right space fans, rockets!  304 tons per launch, 608,000 pounds of aluminum oxide.  But wait, there’s more!  Welcome to the future of aluminum: ALICE!

Rocket propellant has barely changed in the more than 50 years since the launch of the first artificial satellite Sputnik. But a new mixture of nano-aluminum powder and frozen water could make rocket launches more environmentally friendly, and even allow spacecraft to refuel at distant locations such as the moon or Mars.

The aluminum-ice propellant known as ALICE gets its kick from a chemical reaction between water and aluminum. Space.com 2009

The interactions between aluminum exhaust and water have been studied since 1962’s Project Highwater when Atlas rockets dumped 23,000 gallons of water into the ionosphere to make it glow (airglow).


This nano-particle ALICE is now being dubbed as a green-solution to the Aluminum mess they have made:

Also, the term “green propellant” is often confusing, as many assume a green propellant has no environmental impact. Such a propellant is generally beyond the realm of physical possibility. All propellants affect the environment in some way. For instance, all launch vehicles produce exhaust. The components of this exhaust can include soot, carbon dioxide, alumina, inorganic chlorine, water vapor, sulfates, and nitrogen oxides. All of these have an environmental impact, and may contribute to climate change, ozone destruction, or upper atmospheric contrails, depending on the atmospheric layer in which they are deposited; however, the severity and duration of the impact can vary greatly. Given this fact, a green propellant is more correctly viewed as one that seeks to minimize or eliminate a critical environmental impact in one or more of the four main areas. A green propellant is likely to have its own environmental impacts, which may be equal to the current technology in certain areas. For example, many green propellants seek to eliminate hydrazine because of its biologic impact, but they still present atmospheric or space-based effects. Aerospace.org 2011

Nano-particle Aluminum Steam

They are now using nano-particle aluminum to boil frozen water, putting it in ALICE rockets, and we have to consider the possibilities of this technology as it pertains to chemtrails:



rebut this section and comment on the media presentation if you are serious .

yet either way be at peace

namaste

▲

Booby did exactly the same, never answered a question or debated anything about his stupid ice age videos, would repost videos just to avoid answering and cover up questions, points raised etc.

E.g. a fox fell through thin ice into the Danube and was, so it was claimed, flash frozen. That requires the Danube there and then to be made of liquid nitrogen but, nope, no discussion of that.

Faith—a dirty word to me, I prefer “reason.”

You're not fooling anyone Light.  Even your spam can't erase the last 4 pages of your attempts to run and hide from scrutiny behind reposts and dimwitted gifs.

Namaste

Actual proof is not something conspiracy theorists want. Imagine there was a “chemtrail” conspiracy and it was found out and the “sprayers” removed—then what would the conspiracy nuts do?

It is like the conspiracy that we are in an ice age. The storms in Kansas etc prove it, some of the red winter wheat crop lost. That gets reported by those profiting from the ice age conspiracy crap (your gubberment is hiding the TROOTH from you!) but not the four months of abnormally hot winter and spring weather! That weather saw the wheat crop far advanced from what it normally is there this time of year (booting stage) and that is what did the damage. But not according to the conspiracy nuts!

Ah but but but that is the follow up stage! 

If some nutcase can swallow that a fox was flash frozen after falling through thin ice they can swallow anything—except rationality, real evidence etc. I mean, the state of the Arctic should show anyone with two braincells to rub together that we are not in an ice age but over 20,000 deluded nutcases like Booby believe that we are.

Jovial Monk wrote on May 18^th, 2017 at 8:12am:


try not to bring your ice age conspiracy rubbish here





and focus on the title thread , yet either way

be at peace

namaste

Jovial Monk wrote on May 18^th, 2017 at 8:12am:


the proof is supplied and so now you have the opportunity to put up or shut up ..

the evidence is here and so you can start rebutting the evidence provided in #465 ..

or you can run away like a little school girl and admit you are way out of your intellectual depth ..

yet either way be at peace ,

namaste

▲

it_is_the_light wrote on May 18^th, 2017 at 12:36pm:


If you're that fragile take the win, I really don't care about you or what crack pot bullshit you believe in. 

But just so you know, random out of context photos that could show anything doesn't equate to proof, but it's well established that you can't tell fact from bullshit so I'll leave that alone.

Quote:


Yeah, only I answered you, then asked you some questions in return and rather than answer them or even acknowledge my answers, you keep demanding them, accuse me of spamming when I repost or link to them, then continue to spam the poo out of this thread with the same tired bullshit over and over. 

Again, you've guilty of everything you're accusing me of and it makes you nothing but a lying, fake news spreading hypocrite.

Quote:


Edited:

It just got interesting in here, I take that back

Light can still go get stuffed however.