Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print
Ripping Away Workplace Entitlements. (Read 4870 times)
imcrookonit
Ex Member
*



Ripping Away Workplace Entitlements.
Feb 22nd, 2014 at 10:36am
 
Reform or risk jobs, warns Joe Hockey

    DAVID CROWE
    The Australian
    February 22, 2014 1


TIGHT workplace laws are being blamed for pushing up unemployment and keeping young people out of work as Joe Hockey signals government plans for drastic reforms that extend from industrial relations to healthcare and the retirement age.      Sad

Warning that Australia would fall behind the world if it did not act, the Treasurer made the case for highly controversial changes just as the federal government prepares to cut into its biggest spending programs in the May budget.

Mr Hockey argued for more flexible workplace rules on the grounds that onerous restrictions would limit job creation and punish the young, escalating political debate ahead of a government inquiry into industrial relations laws to be launched within days.

The Treasurer indicated that the retirement age would have to be raised beyond 67 as Australia’s population aged and the government struggled to pay the bill for the pension, healthcare and the broader welfare system.

The warnings come as Mr Hockey hosts a summit of his counterparts from the world’s 20 biggest economies to agree on ways to restructure economies and lift global growth.

Using the G20 agenda to argue for domestic reform, Mr Hockey drew on reports issued on Thursday and yesterday from the International Monetary Fund and the OECD that urged action to make labour markets more flexible.

Mr Hockey said the previous government had “re-regulated” the labour market but the lesson from around the world was that too many rules cost jobs.

“There’s a very clear message here: the more regulated the labour market, the higher the unemployment ends up being,” he said at the summit in Sydney yesterday.

“And it costs people their jobs and it means young people in particular lose the opportunity for a job.”

The Treasurer stood by a Coalition election pledge to avoid any major industrial relations reform until after the next election, giving voters the right to approve the changes.

However, his comments support the case for reform as the government gets ready to introduce legislation as early as Tuesday to allow workers to trade away penalty rates, while also releasing the terms of reference for a sweeping Productivity Commission inquiry into Labor’s workplace laws.

“There is no finishing line for reform. It is a relay race with an unlimited number of runners and it will continue to go on long after we’ve gone,” Mr Hockey said.

ACTU assistant secretary Tim Lyons said Mr Hockey’s warnings about workplace rules and unemployment were “absurd” given the experience overseas. “You only have to look at the US, where there are almost no workplace protections but stubbornly high unemployment, to disprove this view,” Mr Lyons said.

“Mr Hockey seems to want to get hairy-chested about rights at work with the G20 here. It’s a pity he wasn’t that honest with Australians before the election.”    

Mr Lyons said that Australia’s labour productivity last year was the fastest in a decade and that ways to lift it included education and innovation, as the OECD report suggests.

Opposition employment spokesman Brendan O’Connor said Mr Hockey was in a “race to the bottom” on working conditions. “When the Treasurer says he wants deregulation and flexibility, he means one thing, ripping away workplace entitlements,” a spokesman for Mr O’Connor said.      Angry

The IMF is shaping the agenda for this weekend’s summit by telling G20 members they could add $2.5 trillion to global economic output if they get their budgets into balance, free up labour markets, encourage infrastructure investment and “rebalance” their economies to encourage domestic demand.

OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurria added to that push yesterday by also urging labour market reform.

“What we know is that if you have excessive employment protection legislation, what you are going to do is conspire against creating new jobs,” he said at a news conference with Mr Hockey.

“If you have excessive protection of the incumbents - the ones who are already in the market - who are going to be ones who stay out, knocking at the door? The youth.”

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
imcrookonit
Ex Member
*



Re: Ripping Away Workplace Entitlements.
Reply #1 - Feb 22nd, 2014 at 10:40am
 
Mr Gurria aimed his warning at European nations in particular, where youth unemployment can be two or three times that of adults, but he released an OECD report that also urges change in Australia.

The report, called Going For Growth, recommends Australia lift the GST, cut company tax and boost productivity.

The peak agency, which monitors the world’s wealthiest nations, said there was “slowing productivity growth” in Australia despite a high level of investment in tertiary education.

That conclusion is disputed by unions, however, given recent figures from the Australian Bureau of Statistics showing a rise in labour productivity after years of poor results.

Mr Gurria said there was a worldwide trend to raising consumption taxes because it could reduce taxes on labour.

“We are all strapped for money, we all want to reduce deficits. Australia is in better shape there but you want to continue that.”

In line with previous OECD findings, the agency recommended Australia reduce its “comparatively high company tax rate” of 30 per cent and “rely more” on indirect taxes such as the GST.

Mr Hockey’s comments yesterday make it clear that an increase in the retirement age was on the agenda, going beyond Wayne Swan’s move in the 2009 budget to lift it from 65 to 67 in a gradual change by 2023.

Mr Hockey expressed his concern that the retirement age might not be sustainable even after the previous Labor government increased it to 67.       Shocked

“The starting point is we have to focus on structural challenges,” Mr Hockey said. He noted that Australia set the retirement age at 65 in 1909 when life expectancy was 65 but that life expectancy had now increased to 85.

“Now the previous government increased it to 67 but as the UK and others are focusing (on it), we have to look at ways to increase it as we live longer,” he said.

Mr Hockey said a lot of countries faced the challenge of an ageing population.

“We’re having a discussion about the quality of life we want people to have as they are ageing, and how sustainable that quality of life is.

“What is sustainable? What is the quality of healthcare? What is the quality of aged care? How are we going to get enough finance to live with dignity?”

Those comments came after the Treasurer used an interview on the Seven Network yesterday morning to also canvass healthcare reform. He warned Australia would “run out of money” if there was no change to health, welfare and education outlays. Medicare was going to increase from a $65 billion annual cost to $75bn within the next three years, he said.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
imcrookonit
Ex Member
*



Re: Ripping Away Workplace Entitlements.
Reply #2 - Feb 22nd, 2014 at 10:56am
 
Liberal Government back to old habits with the return of Individual Contracts
20 February, 2014 | Media Release Unions demand the Abbott Government drop any attempt to introduce Individual Contracts that will cut take-home pay.

ACTU President Ged Kearney said the Abbott Government has given employers the green light to cut people’s pay under the guise of greater ‘flexibility’.

“This is a blatant attempt to cut pay and conditions through Individual Contracts and shows the Abbott Government doesn’t understand the concerns of Australian workers,” she said.

“We know that the Liberal Party definition of flexibility has always been flexibility by workers not for workers and that’s exactly what we have seen again today.”

“Don’t be mistaken, this is an attempt to slash take home pays and working conditions and despite all the pre-election promises, this is undoubtedly what is happening here,” she said.

“Workers and employers need flexibility but this is an extreme and hard-line stance by the Abbott Government to say that a parent of a sick child should take a pay cut in order to look after their family.

“This is an unacceptable choice between workers earning enough to meet their living costs and their ability to look after their family.”

“Minister Abetz talks about imaginary workers that want to give up penalty rates for nothing. We’re yet to find a worker that thinks this is a good deal.”

Only yesterday new figures showed that Australia is experiencing the slowest wages growth on record while the cost of living is rising quickly, faster than wages.

“Australia is in the midst of a job security crisis with thousands of workers losing their jobs and many others pushed into casual insecure work. That’s what the Abbott Government should be focused on, not on making life tougher for people.”

But day after day we keep seeing the Abbott Government trying to drive down wages at a time when families can least afford it.

News reports today show that the Abbott government pressed SPC to slash worker’s wages by up to 40%. The Abbott Government was twice found misleading the public after private companies SPC and Toyota were forced to publicly clarify misleading statements made the government about worker’s wages and conditions.

“Now that the so called ‘wages blowout’ has been proven to be a lie, the Abbott Government has fallen back on Individual Contracts - which were a hallmark of WorkChoices - cutting wages and diminishing conditions that Australian workers rely on in order to balance life and work.”

Under WorkChoices most individual contracts removed basic award conditions:
-    65% of individual agreements removed penalty rates
-    70% of individual agreements removed shift loading
-    68% of individual agreements removed annual leave loading
-    50% of individual agreements removed public holiday pay
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 60979
Here
Gender: male
Re: Ripping Away Workplace Entitlements.
Reply #3 - Feb 23rd, 2014 at 7:00pm
 
Who voted for these mean malicious idiots.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Lobo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 7407
Sydney
Gender: male
Re: Ripping Away Workplace Entitlements.
Reply #4 - Feb 23rd, 2014 at 7:04pm
 
Quote:
TIGHT workplace laws are being blamed for pushing up unemployment and keeping young people out of work as Joe Hockey signals government plans for drastic reforms that extend from industrial relations to healthcare and the retirement age. 


How'd that go again??

"The term 'Workchoices' is dead and buried."....T.A.

Wink
Back to top
 

"What's in store for me in the direction I don't take?"-Jack Kerouac.
 
IP Logged
 
miketrees
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6491
Gender: male
Re: Ripping Away Workplace Entitlements.
Reply #5 - Feb 23rd, 2014 at 7:15pm
 
My work has moved to only employing contractors.

Its probably illegal but thats how it is.

No problems with employment laws, good possibility of employing illegals etc

I am looking for another job.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 39615
Gender: male
Re: Ripping Away Workplace Entitlements.
Reply #6 - Feb 23rd, 2014 at 8:04pm
 
miketrees wrote on Feb 23rd, 2014 at 7:15pm:
My work has moved to only employing contractors.

Its probably illegal but thats how it is.

No problems with employment laws, good possibility of employing illegals etc

I am looking for another job.


Can't blame you for that as it probably is illegal.


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Swagman
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Beware of cheap imitations......

Posts: 15095
Illawarra NSW
Gender: male
Re: Ripping Away Workplace Entitlements.
Reply #7 - Feb 23rd, 2014 at 8:12pm
 
Dnarever wrote on Feb 23rd, 2014 at 7:00pm:
Who voted for these mean malicious idiots.


The majority, so suck schitt
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Kat
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Socialism IS the answer.

Posts: 17709
Everywhere and no-where
Gender: female
Re: Ripping Away Workplace Entitlements.
Reply #8 - Feb 23rd, 2014 at 8:19pm
 
Dnarever wrote on Feb 23rd, 2014 at 7:00pm:
Who voted for these mean malicious idiots.


Other mean, malicious idiots.
Back to top
 

...
 
IP Logged
 
Bam
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21905
Gender: male
Re: Ripping Away Workplace Entitlements.
Reply #9 - Feb 23rd, 2014 at 8:59pm
 
Swagman wrote on Feb 23rd, 2014 at 8:12pm:
Dnarever wrote on Feb 23rd, 2014 at 7:00pm:
Who voted for these mean malicious idiots.


The majority, so suck schitt

Not true.

Liberal Party 32.02%
LNP (Qld) 8.92%
Nationals 4.29%
CLP (NT) 0.32%

Total 45.55%
Back to top
 

You are not entitled to your opinion. You are only entitled to hold opinions that you can defend through sound, reasoned argument.
 
IP Logged
 
Bam
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21905
Gender: male
Re: Ripping Away Workplace Entitlements.
Reply #10 - Feb 23rd, 2014 at 9:01pm
 
Lobo wrote on Feb 23rd, 2014 at 7:04pm:
Quote:
TIGHT workplace laws are being blamed for pushing up unemployment and keeping young people out of work as Joe Hockey signals government plans for drastic reforms that extend from industrial relations to healthcare and the retirement age. 


How'd that go again??

"The term 'Workchoices' is dead and buried."....T.A.

Wink

Workchoices is dead and buried ... Now meet his twin brother! Muhahaha!
Back to top
 

You are not entitled to your opinion. You are only entitled to hold opinions that you can defend through sound, reasoned argument.
 
IP Logged
 
miketrees
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6491
Gender: male
Re: Ripping Away Workplace Entitlements.
Reply #11 - Feb 23rd, 2014 at 9:17pm
 
The contractor policy was brought in under the Labor government.

You should not have laws you cant enforce, because that makes crooks rich.

My boss resisted the contractor option as long as he could but he is getting killed on price by "contractors"
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 60979
Here
Gender: male
Re: Ripping Away Workplace Entitlements.
Reply #12 - Feb 23rd, 2014 at 9:26pm
 
Trust the Lieberals on Industrial relations - bet your bottom that you can't.

6 years of trust us we wouldn't do that was all BS.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pantheon
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Woke

Posts: 1256
Gender: male
Re: Ripping Away Workplace Entitlements.
Reply #13 - Feb 23rd, 2014 at 9:43pm
 
back in 2012, i was fired from my job saying that the business couldn't pay me my wages due to how high they are.. a year later i left and they declared bankruptcy and went out of business..

Something has to be done about wages and workers Entitlements. Wages are rising despite the profitability of small businesses are decreasing, expanding Entitlements and rising wages to a point, the only people who will be afford to pay for these increase's are big business.

Rising minimal wage for example, destroy small business and the only people who could afford to pay these increase are large multinational corporation and by taking over the void left by the small businesses, they increase their power and influences.

instead of rising wages, we should try and tackle and lower the cost of living, so there is no need to increase wages, as a simple $14 an hour becomes an livable wage which is equal to today's $30 an hour wage.

Sadly there needs a balance.
Back to top
 

[b][center]Socialism had been tried on every continent on earth. In light of its results, it's time to question the motives of its advocates.
 
IP Logged
 
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 60979
Here
Gender: male
Re: Ripping Away Workplace Entitlements.
Reply #14 - Feb 23rd, 2014 at 10:12pm
 
Pantheon wrote on Feb 23rd, 2014 at 9:43pm:
back in 2012, i was fired from my job saying that the business couldn't pay me my wages due to how high they are.. a year later i left and they declared bankruptcy and went out of business..

Something has to be done about wages and workers Entitlements. Wages are rising despite the profitability of small businesses are decreasing, expanding Entitlements and rising wages to a point, the only people who will be afford to pay for these increase's are big business.

Rising minimal wage for example, destroy small business and the only people who could afford to pay these increase are large multinational corporation and by taking over the void left by the small businesses, they increase their power and influences.

instead of rising wages, we should try and tackle and lower the cost of living, so there is no need to increase wages, as a simple $14 an hour becomes an livable wage which is equal to today's $30 an hour wage.

Sadly there needs a balance.


And the CEO walks away with over 1,000 an hour.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print