Australian Politics Forum - Mont Pelerin Society

ImSpartacus2

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 6913

Re: Mont Pelerin Society
Reply #30 - Jan 20^th, 2014 at 9:39pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Jan 20^th, 2014 at 12:21pm:

ImSpartacus2 wrote on Jan 20^th, 2014 at 10:04am:

I see gizmo you have moved on to defcon 2 of the denialist handbook. Just pretend you weren't asked to substantiate your spurious claims for rejecting the finding of the overwhelming majority of experts in the field. These word games won't help you when the world starts clamoring to punish those whose grossly negligent denialism caused such destruction.

Yeah, but there is NO 'denialist handbook'.If you want to use the conspiracy theory skepticism idea, why not just go with the 'usual suspect' idea, the Illuminati, the Masons, the Reptiolds or the Black Lectorids from the 8th dimension???

It's actually funny to watch people like # accuse skeptics of believing in a 'conspiracy of scientists' and then post about a 'conspiracy of skeptics'...do you even SEE the irony???

Honestly, it's s bad as Wharfy's stuff about Queen Elizabeth being a shape shifting alien reptile..

still being evasive, refusing to answer the questions because you know there's no substance to your spurious claims for rejecting the finding of the overwhelming majority of expert climate scientists.

Back to top

IP Logged

gizmo_2655

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male

Re: Mont Pelerin Society
Reply #31 - Jan 21^st, 2014 at 2:24pm

ImSpartacus2 wrote on Jan 20^th, 2014 at 9:39pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Jan 20^th, 2014 at 12:21pm:

ImSpartacus2 wrote on Jan 20^th, 2014 at 10:04am:

I see gizmo you have moved on to defcon 2 of the denialist handbook. Just pretend you weren't asked to substantiate your spurious claims for rejecting the finding of the overwhelming majority of experts in the field. These word games won't help you when the world starts clamoring to punish those whose grossly negligent denialism caused such destruction.

Yeah, but there is NO 'denialist handbook'.If you want to use the conspiracy theory skepticism idea, why not just go with the 'usual suspect' idea, the Illuminati, the Masons, the Reptiolds or the Black Lectorids from the 8th dimension???

It's actually funny to watch people like # accuse skeptics of believing in a 'conspiracy of scientists' and then post about a 'conspiracy of skeptics'...do you even SEE the irony???

Honestly, it's s bad as Wharfy's stuff about Queen Elizabeth being a shape shifting alien reptile..

still being evasive, refusing to answer the questions because you know there's no substance to your spurious claims for rejecting the finding of the overwhelming majority of expert climate scientists.

Nope, not evasive, my position has always been the same. I haven't yet seen enough evidence to conclusively show that mankind is the 'main cause' of climate change, and warmists idea of a 'secret, shadow group' behind ALL anthropogenic climate change skepticism is over reaching and stupid.. Basically, it's not necessary since there is enough dispute on the causes of climate change and enough dispute on the amount of temperature increase for it to be entirely natural.

Back to top

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat

IP Logged

ImSpartacus2

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 6913

Re: Mont Pelerin Society
Reply #32 - Jan 21^st, 2014 at 5:25pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Jan 21^st, 2014 at 2:24pm:

ImSpartacus2 wrote on Jan 20^th, 2014 at 9:39pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Jan 20^th, 2014 at 12:21pm:

ImSpartacus2 wrote on Jan 20^th, 2014 at 10:04am:

I see gizmo you have moved on to defcon 2 of the denialist handbook. Just pretend you weren't asked to substantiate your spurious claims for rejecting the finding of the overwhelming majority of experts in the field. These word games won't help you when the world starts clamoring to punish those whose grossly negligent denialism caused such destruction.

Yeah, but there is NO 'denialist handbook'.If you want to use the conspiracy theory skepticism idea, why not just go with the 'usual suspect' idea, the Illuminati, the Masons, the Reptiolds or the Black Lectorids from the 8th dimension???

It's actually funny to watch people like # accuse skeptics of believing in a 'conspiracy of scientists' and then post about a 'conspiracy of skeptics'...do you even SEE the irony???

Honestly, it's s bad as Wharfy's stuff about Queen Elizabeth being a shape shifting alien reptile..

still being evasive, refusing to answer the questions because you know there's no substance to your spurious claims for rejecting the finding of the overwhelming majority of expert climate scientists.

Nope, not evasive, my position has always been the same. I haven't yet seen enough evidence to conclusively show that mankind is the 'main cause' of climate change, and warmists idea of a 'secret, shadow group' behind ALL anthropogenic climate change skepticism is over reaching and stupid.. Basically, it's not necessary since there is enough dispute on the causes of climate change and enough dispute on the amount of temperature increase for it to be entirely natural.

So says someone who knows absolutely sh!t about the science involved and therefor is not in a position to even assess the evidence but when pressed for evidence of his denialist position digs up some stupid claim about polar bears, no water in Australian dams and no snow in Europe. You're a liar pure and simple.

Back to top

IP Logged