Australian Politics Forum - Global warming is real? Tell the frozen US/UK!

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 156208
Gender: male

Re: Global warming is real? Tell the frozen US/UK!
Reply #90 - Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:26pm

muso wrote on Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:23pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:14pm:

muso wrote on Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:10pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:04pm:

muso wrote on Jan 12^th, 2014 at 6:27pm:

Through the use of radioactive isotopes, we are more than 99 percent sure that much of the carbon in the air has human fingerprints on it.

You're assuming that radioactive isotopes are infallible.

Using your "logic", I can safely say that through the use of Bill Clinton's evidence, we are more than 99% sure that he never had sexual relations with that woman.

Seriously, do you believe the crap that you type in this forum?

So are you saying that 99% means infallible? Can you clarify that a bit?

Your comprehension skills aren't that good either.

Now you're confusing the method with the results.

You're assuming that your method is infallible.

How do you reconcile that with my statement that it's 99% certain. I'll ask you again. Do you consider that 99% means infallible? - because it certainly sounds that way.

Let's dissect what I said:

Through the use of radioactive isotopes

(the method)

, we are more than 99 percent sure that much of the carbon in the air has human fingerprints on it.

How certain are you of the reliability of radioactive isotopes?

What percentage, and why?

(seriously, I can't believe someone can be this stupid)

Back to top

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles

IP Logged

muso

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male

Re: Global warming is real? Tell the frozen US/UK!
Reply #91 - Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:27pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:17pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:02pm:

Greg's weak spot is the cloud debate!

When it comes to AGW, Greg doesn't have a weak spot.

Every single disciple of the Climate Church has come off second best when trying to debate me.

It's like shooting fish in a barrel.

You're a legend in you're own lunchtime, mate. When it comes to BS, nobody can out BS you!

Back to top

1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: Global warming is real? Tell the frozen US/UK!
Reply #92 - Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:28pm

muso wrote on Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:23pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:14pm:

muso wrote on Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:10pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:04pm:

muso wrote on Jan 12^th, 2014 at 6:27pm:

Through the use of radioactive isotopes, we are more than 99 percent sure that much of the carbon in the air has human fingerprints on it.

You're assuming that radioactive isotopes are infallible.

Using your "logic", I can safely say that through the use of Bill Clinton's evidence, we are more than 99% sure that he never had sexual relations with that woman.

Seriously, do you believe the crap that you type in this forum?

So are you saying that 99% means infallible? Can you clarify that a bit?

Your comprehension skills aren't that good either.

Now you're confusing the method with the results.

You're assuming that your method is infallible.

How do you reconcile that with my statement that it's 99% certain. I'll ask you again. Do you consider that 99% means infallible? - because it certainly sounds that way.

Let's dissect what I said:

Through the use of radioactive isotopes

(the method)

, we are more than 99 percent sure that much of the carbon in the air has human fingerprints on it.

Greggy is entertaining that the world around us never relied on no system for measurement: the captains of the world were simply magically born with money and Grin

lol I dunno what he's on about seriously!

Society has an arrogance problem hence 9-11: war is conducted in the economic sphere and the chiefs don't talk but point!

We are not gods like Greggy ya see Cheesy

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 156208
Gender: male

Re: Global warming is real? Tell the frozen US/UK!
Reply #93 - Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:29pm

muso wrote on Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:27pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:17pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:02pm:

Greg's weak spot is the cloud debate!

When it comes to AGW, Greg doesn't have a weak spot.

Every single disciple of the Climate Church has come off second best when trying to debate me.

It's like shooting fish in a barrel.

You're a legend in you're own lunchtime, mate. When it comes to BS, nobody can out BS you!

White flag accepted.

At least I've made you stop and think, and realise that radioactive isotopes might not actually be infallible.

This is good.

We're making progress.

Back to top

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: Global warming is real? Tell the frozen US/UK!
Reply #94 - Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:29pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:26pm:

muso wrote on Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:23pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:14pm:

muso wrote on Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:10pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:04pm:

muso wrote on Jan 12^th, 2014 at 6:27pm:

Through the use of radioactive isotopes, we are more than 99 percent sure that much of the carbon in the air has human fingerprints on it.

You're assuming that radioactive isotopes are infallible.

Using your "logic", I can safely say that through the use of Bill Clinton's evidence, we are more than 99% sure that he never had sexual relations with that woman.

Seriously, do you believe the crap that you type in this forum?

So are you saying that 99% means infallible? Can you clarify that a bit?

Your comprehension skills aren't that good either.

Now you're confusing the method with the results.

You're assuming that your method is infallible.

How do you reconcile that with my statement that it's 99% certain. I'll ask you again. Do you consider that 99% means infallible? - because it certainly sounds that way.

Let's dissect what I said:

Through the use of radioactive isotopes

(the method)

, we are more than 99 percent sure that much of the carbon in the air has human fingerprints on it.

How certain are you of the reliability of radioactive isotopes?

What percentage, and why?

(seriously, I can't believe someone can be this stupid)

Greggy is handing out the homework Grin

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

muso

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male

Re: Global warming is real? Tell the frozen US/UK!
Reply #95 - Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:30pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:26pm:

muso wrote on Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:23pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:14pm:

muso wrote on Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:10pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:04pm:

muso wrote on Jan 12^th, 2014 at 6:27pm:

Through the use of radioactive isotopes, we are more than 99 percent sure that much of the carbon in the air has human fingerprints on it.

You're assuming that radioactive isotopes are infallible.

Using your "logic", I can safely say that through the use of Bill Clinton's evidence, we are more than 99% sure that he never had sexual relations with that woman.

Seriously, do you believe the crap that you type in this forum?

So are you saying that 99% means infallible? Can you clarify that a bit?

Your comprehension skills aren't that good either.

Now you're confusing the method with the results.

You're assuming that your method is infallible.

How do you reconcile that with my statement that it's 99% certain. I'll ask you again. Do you consider that 99% means infallible? - because it certainly sounds that way.

Let's dissect what I said:

Through the use of radioactive isotopes

(the method)

, we are more than 99 percent sure that much of the carbon in the air has human fingerprints on it.

How certain are you of the reliability of radioactive isotopes?

What percentage, and why?

What do you mean by the reliability of the Radioactive isotopes? Are you talking about the method, the fact that they are radioactive? Their activity or the colour of liquefied oxygen? (it's blue)

I'm sorry, but you'll have to be more specific. I don't understand Gibberish.

Back to top

1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: Global warming is real? Tell the frozen US/UK!
Reply #96 - Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:30pm

muso wrote on Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:27pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:17pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:02pm:

Greg's weak spot is the cloud debate!

When it comes to AGW, Greg doesn't have a weak spot.

Every single disciple of the Climate Church has come off second best when trying to debate me.

It's like shooting fish in a barrel.

You're a legend in you're own lunchtime, mate. When it comes to BS, nobody can out BS you!

Greggy hates kids: simple as Grin

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 156208 Gender:	Re: Global warming is real? Tell the frozen US/UK! Reply #97 - Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:31pm muso wrote on Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:30pm: I don't understand . Nobody ever doubted that.
Back to top	GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles IP Logged

muso

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male

Re: Global warming is real? Tell the frozen US/UK!
Reply #98 - Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:32pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:29pm:

muso wrote on Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:27pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:17pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:02pm:

Greg's weak spot is the cloud debate!

When it comes to AGW, Greg doesn't have a weak spot.

Every single disciple of the Climate Church has come off second best when trying to debate me.

It's like shooting fish in a barrel.

You're a legend in you're own lunchtime, mate. When it comes to BS, nobody can out BS you!

White flag accepted.

At least I've made you stop and think, and realise that radioactive isotopes might not actually be infallible.

This is good.

We're making progress.

Nothing is infallible, except the Pope and greggerypeccary, and I'd rate the Pope as more widely accepted as infallible. Of course, you might differ.

Back to top

1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: Global warming is real? Tell the frozen US/UK!
Reply #99 - Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:32pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:29pm:

muso wrote on Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:27pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:17pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:02pm:

Greg's weak spot is the cloud debate!

When it comes to AGW, Greg doesn't have a weak spot.

Every single disciple of the Climate Church has come off second best when trying to debate me.

It's like shooting fish in a barrel.

You're a legend in you're own lunchtime, mate. When it comes to BS, nobody can out BS you!

White flag accepted.

At least I've made you stop and think, and realise that radioactive isotopes might not actually be infallible.

This is good.

We're making progress.

Creationists don't believe in progress! They believe in a heavenly govern.... Wait, they don't even believe in that Cheesy

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

muso

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male

Re: Global warming is real? Tell the frozen US/UK!
Reply #100 - Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:33pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:31pm:

muso wrote on Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:30pm:

I don't understand .

Nobody ever doubted that.

Wonderful. Thanks for that admission that you think you're losing. I asked you to clarify your question and you ignored it and went straight for the personal insult.

Back to top

1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 156208
Gender: male

Re: Global warming is real? Tell the frozen US/UK!
Reply #101 - Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:34pm

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:32pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:29pm:

muso wrote on Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:27pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:17pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:02pm:

Greg's weak spot is the cloud debate!

When it comes to AGW, Greg doesn't have a weak spot.

Every single disciple of the Climate Church has come off second best when trying to debate me.

It's like shooting fish in a barrel.

You're a legend in you're own lunchtime, mate. When it comes to BS, nobody can out BS you!

White flag accepted.

At least I've made you stop and think, and realise that radioactive isotopes might not actually be infallible.

This is good.

We're making progress.

Creationists don't believe in progress! They believe in a heavenly govern.... Wait, they don't even believe in that Cheesy

Well, you can discuss that with them at your next meeting.

Back to top

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles

IP Logged

muso Gold Member Offline Posts: 13151 Gladstone, Queensland Gender:	Re: Global warming is real? Tell the frozen US/UK! Reply #102 - Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:36pm greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:34pm: Well, you can discuss that with them at your next meeting. Oi. Enough of the soft targets. I asked you to clarify your question.
Back to top	1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 156208
Gender: male

Re: Global warming is real? Tell the frozen US/UK!
Reply #103 - Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:36pm

muso wrote on Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:33pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:31pm:

muso wrote on Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:30pm:

I don't understand .

Nobody ever doubted that.

Wonderful. Thanks for that admission that you think you're losing.

Hey, no problem at all.

I freely admit to the fact that I'm losing the battle to make you realise that everything you write on this subject is based on blind faith and naivety.

Back to top

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles

IP Logged

muso

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male

Re: Global warming is real? Tell the frozen US/UK!
Reply #104 - Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:39pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:36pm:

Hey, no problem at all.

I freely admit to the fact that I'm losing the battle to make you realise that everything you write on this subject is based on blind faith and naivety.

I have faith in my ability to apply the scientific method if that's what you mean.

I don't know about naivety. Most would consider me cynical.

Clarify your question and stop dodging.

Back to top

1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not

IP Logged