Australian Politics Forum - Abbott's Anti Choice Conservatives

aquascoot

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 38191
Gender: male

Re: Abbott's Anti Choice Conservatives
Reply #15 - Jan 6^th, 2014 at 2:01pm

Innocent bystander wrote on Jan 6^th, 2014 at 1:07pm:

What surprises me is the way the pro abortionists get so hostile over the issue, the bare mention of it has them frothing at the mouth like lunatics, its almost like they want to pick up a scalpel and start killing the littlies themselves while screaming kill the babies kill them all now, very irrational, they would have enjoyed the aztec sacrifices.

maybe we could build a large mayan temple on chritmas island to help them satisfy their blood lust.

Back to top

IP Logged

____

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male

Re: Abbott's Anti Choice Conservatives
Reply #16 - Jan 6^th, 2014 at 2:56pm

FriYAY wrote on Jan 6^th, 2014 at 1:18pm:

____ wrote on Jan 6^th, 2014 at 11:54am:

FriYAY wrote on Jan 6^th, 2014 at 11:51am:

____ wrote on Jan 6^th, 2014 at 11:46am:

Swagman wrote on Jan 6^th, 2014 at 11:41am:

____ wrote on Jan 6^th, 2014 at 11:37am:

where does Abbott sit on the right of women over their bodies?

On the side of the un-born child and it's life.

So Abbott wants to remove the rights of women … is this because he hates women?

And why draw the line there, how about all the babies denied lives by condoms. Will conservatives call for their banning?

Link to the highlighted please moron....

I think Abbott said abortion should be legal, safe and rare.

The previous poster, swagman, stated Abbott was on the side of the foetus and so by being on that side Abbott would be for the death of a women vis child birth.

Basic deduction from the view of the other poster.

It’s a retarded deduction by you, and you know it.

It was you who jumped to the wrong conclusion via selective reading. Open your eyes and your grey matter could possibly follow.

Back to top

IP Logged

Swagman

Gold Member

Offline

Beware of cheap imitations......

Posts: 15095
Illawarra NSW
Gender: male

Re: Abbott's Anti Choice Conservatives
Reply #17 - Jan 6^th, 2014 at 5:14pm

____ wrote on Jan 6^th, 2014 at 11:46am:

Swagman wrote on Jan 6^th, 2014 at 11:41am:

____ wrote on Jan 6^th, 2014 at 11:37am:

where does Abbott sit on the right of women over their bodies?

On the side of the un-born child and it's life.

So Abbott wants to remove the rights of women … is this because he hates women?

And why draw the line there, how about all the babies denied lives by condoms. Will conservatives call for their banning?

No I guess he believes that the human rights of the un-born child need protecting. It cannot protect itself so society should be protecting it.

Society protects children because they cannot protect themselves, society protects the aged and infirm because they cannot protect themselves.

Human life begins at conception, not 1 week, not 20 weeks or 9 months but at conception. Sad

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 39971
Gender: male

Re: Abbott's Anti Choice Conservatives
Reply #18 - Jan 6^th, 2014 at 5:28pm

woody2014 wrote on Jan 6^th, 2014 at 1:56pm:

skippy. wrote on Jan 6^th, 2014 at 1:52pm:

Swagman wrote on Jan 6^th, 2014 at 11:41am:

____ wrote on Jan 6^th, 2014 at 11:37am:

where does Abbott sit on the right of women over their bodies?

On the side of the un-born child and it's life.

Yes he cares a lot, when he thought he duffed his shag he opted to farm it out.

Link sweet cheeks

How many links would you like?

Back to top

IP Logged

____

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male

Re: Abbott's Anti Choice Conservatives
Reply #19 - Jan 6^th, 2014 at 5:45pm

Swagman wrote on Jan 6^th, 2014 at 5:14pm:

____ wrote on Jan 6^th, 2014 at 11:46am:

Swagman wrote on Jan 6^th, 2014 at 11:41am:

____ wrote on Jan 6^th, 2014 at 11:37am:

where does Abbott sit on the right of women over their bodies?

On the side of the un-born child and it's life.

So Abbott wants to remove the rights of women … is this because he hates women?

And why draw the line there, how about all the babies denied lives by condoms. Will conservatives call for their banning?

No I guess he believes that the human rights of the un-born child need protecting. It cannot protect itself so society should be protecting it.

Society protects children because they cannot protect themselves, society protects the aged and infirm because they cannot protect themselves.

Human life begins at conception, not 1 week, not 20 weeks or 9 months but at conception. Sad

Why conception and not at the sperm or egg stage?

And if it's at contraception stage then parents should be paid Abbott's paternity leave from conception.

Back to top

IP Logged

Swagman

Gold Member

Offline

Beware of cheap imitations......

Posts: 15095
Illawarra NSW
Gender: male

Re: Abbott's Anti Choice Conservatives
Reply #20 - Jan 6^th, 2014 at 5:58pm

____ wrote on Jan 6^th, 2014 at 5:45pm:

Swagman wrote on Jan 6^th, 2014 at 5:14pm:

____ wrote on Jan 6^th, 2014 at 11:46am:

Swagman wrote on Jan 6^th, 2014 at 11:41am:

____ wrote on Jan 6^th, 2014 at 11:37am:

where does Abbott sit on the right of women over their bodies?

On the side of the un-born child and it's life.

So Abbott wants to remove the rights of women … is this because he hates women?

And why draw the line there, how about all the babies denied lives by condoms. Will conservatives call for their banning?

No I guess he believes that the human rights of the un-born child need protecting. It cannot protect itself so society should be protecting it.

Society protects children because they cannot protect themselves, society protects the aged and infirm because they cannot protect themselves.

Human life begins at conception, not 1 week, not 20 weeks or 9 months but at conception. Sad

Why conception and not at the sperm or egg stage?

And if it's at contraception stage then parents should be paid Abbott's paternity leave from conception.

Simple answer is that conception is required for life to begin. Human life cannot spark with the egg or sperm alone.

You want to trace your life back to it's start then you will end at the moment of your conception and not 20 weeks later.

Paternity leave is a rort.

Back to top

IP Logged

____

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male

Re: Abbott's Anti Choice Conservatives
Reply #21 - Jan 6^th, 2014 at 6:15pm

Swagman wrote on Jan 6^th, 2014 at 5:58pm:

____ wrote on Jan 6^th, 2014 at 5:45pm:

Swagman wrote on Jan 6^th, 2014 at 5:14pm:

____ wrote on Jan 6^th, 2014 at 11:46am:

Swagman wrote on Jan 6^th, 2014 at 11:41am:

____ wrote on Jan 6^th, 2014 at 11:37am:

where does Abbott sit on the right of women over their bodies?

On the side of the un-born child and it's life.

So Abbott wants to remove the rights of women … is this because he hates women?

And why draw the line there, how about all the babies denied lives by condoms. Will conservatives call for their banning?

No I guess he believes that the human rights of the un-born child need protecting. It cannot protect itself so society should be protecting it.

Society protects children because they cannot protect themselves, society protects the aged and infirm because they cannot protect themselves.

Human life begins at conception, not 1 week, not 20 weeks or 9 months but at conception. Sad

Why conception and not at the sperm or egg stage?

And if it's at contraception stage then parents should be paid Abbott's paternity leave from conception.

Simple answer is that conception is required for life to begin. Human life cannot spark with the egg or sperm alone.

You want to trace your life back to it's start then you will end at the moment of your conception and not 20 weeks later.

Paternity leave is a rort.

We can create babies without men, claim scientists
Fertility specialists have found a way for women to have babies without men.

It involves a cocktail of chemicals acting as an 'artificial sperm' to trick a human egg into forming an embryo.

And paid paternity leave, rort or not, it is still the policy the cons promised at the last election.
If conception is the beginning of a baby's life to some conservatives then paternity leave should begin then.

Back to top

IP Logged

Swagman

Gold Member

Offline

Beware of cheap imitations......

Posts: 15095
Illawarra NSW
Gender: male

Re: Abbott's Anti Choice Conservatives
Reply #22 - Jan 7^th, 2014 at 9:57am

____ wrote on Jan 6^th, 2014 at 6:15pm:

We can create babies without men, claim scientists
Fertility specialists have found a way for women to have babies without men.

It involves a cocktail of chemicals acting as an 'artificial sperm' to trick a human egg into forming an embryo.

Scientists make lots of claims mainly to extort taxpayer funds from gullible public servants.

____ wrote on Jan 6^th, 2014 at 6:15pm:

And paid paternity leave, rort or not, it is still the policy the cons promised at the last election.
If conception is the beginning of a baby's life to some conservatives then paternity leave should begin then

Juliar had her own rorting paid maternity / paternity leave scam, Abbott's is only marginally better because it treats it as an employment entitlement and it's paid by a levy on business.

Juliar's was just a pork barrell and paid for by the usual suspects being the minority that pay the majority of tax.

Back to top

IP Logged