Until this argument I've never heard a word about same-sex marriage being anywhere accepted as 'normal' and a part of marriage.

As far back as any history I've ever read there have been homosexual acts, but never heard of anything like same-sex marriage as such - thought here was a lot of rejection of same-sex relationships.

I think this entire argument is based on nothing but someone's fantasy.

It's funny - homosexual acts were sort of tolerated as a means of sexual release... people did some strange things - but that still didn't make it the sexual preference of preference.

Remember the Wyatt Earp story?  Those Cowboys gang people were notorious for homosexuality - Johnny Ringo was a 'flute player' - but they still went for women when in town.  Getting the rocks off elsewise apparently was acceptable when there was no poontang around.

Brokeass Mountain... Homo On the Range...