With pathological liars like greggerypeccary, truth lies less in what they say than in what they refuse to say. So what has greggerypeccary revealed?
# wrote on Jan 5
th, 2014 at 9:40am:
... I'll try to answer on your behalf. If you're honest, then you'll correct any mistakes I make. Of course, remaining silent confirms my answers.
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 4
th, 2014 at 11:32am:
...
... no confusion.
...
That's actually truth, of a sort. Pretending to confuse probability and possibility was a lie. You knew exactly what you were doing.
# wrote on Jan 4
th, 2014 at 10:57am:
... You are a church-goer, aren't you, greggerypeccary?
If memory serves, you once said to me that you have "no scientific faith". Those words imply that your behaviour stems from some other faith.
One of the
Abrahamic religions, I guess. Perhaps a fringe cult, given the peculiarities of greggerypeccary.
# wrote on Jan 4
th, 2014 at 10:57am:
...
What is the probability that the vast majority of the best qualified and every organisation of reputable scientists is wrong*? How does it compare with the probability that they're right*?
...
* Crude binary, pandering to your limited
Conservative mind.
His inability to present evidence shows that, at best, greggerypeccary merely has faith that global warming is not anthropogenic. Of course, he
could be lying. With greggerypeccary, that's always a distinct possibility.
You see, greggerypeccary has given no cause to suppose that he really believes a word he says. That would explain why he's so equivocal. It's possible that he just posts whatever will provoke a reaction for his amusement. That is; greggerypeccary might be no more than a troll.
So; liar, deluded, thug, troll; let the reader decide which terms describe greggerypeccary.
on Jan 5
th, 2014 at 9:46am:
... Never been to a church service in my life.
So Christianity denied; Abrahamic religion not denied.
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 5
th, 2014 at 9:46am:
# wrote on Jan 5
th, 2014 at 9:40am:
If memory serves, you once said to me that you have "no scientific faith".
Your memory has failed you. I've never said anything remotely like that, to anyone.
Either our memories differ or greggerypeccary lied. The balance of probabilities favours the latter.
Refusal to address the issue of
the probability that the vast majority of the best qualified and every organisation of reputable scientists is wrong*, reveals that greggerypeccary's belief has no basis beyond faith.
Losing the debate, greggerypeccary
tried to distract. In the process, he gave convincing evidence that denial of the significance of majority in science is based on fabrication, supported by the disreputable.
Forum
Pages: 
