Australian Politics Forum - Hottest year on record

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: Hottest year on record
Reply #150 - Jan 4^th, 2014 at 5:18pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 4^th, 2014 at 5:00pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 4^th, 2014 at 4:52pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 4^th, 2014 at 4:50pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 4^th, 2014 at 4:47pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 4^th, 2014 at 4:34pm:

# wrote on Jan 4^th, 2014 at 2:13pm:

# wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2014 at 3:35pm:

...
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2014 at 1:16pm:

# wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2014 at 12:59pm:

Or are you saying that nothing less than 100% will suffice?

Considering the very, very small differences in temperature that are being reported, yes.

Substantiation? Link to any scientific projection with a 100% confidence level?

Still waiting, greggerypeccary. Have you been making stuff up again?

"Making stuff up"?

Not at all.

You seem a tad confused.

By all means though, tell me what it is that I've "made up".

You're the one saying science should come with 100% confidence levels!

Nope, not me.

Yes you are!

Incorrect.

And you know it's incorrect, or you would have provided a link to the post where I supposedly made the claim.

Of course, you can't provide the link because the post doesn't exist.

Why do members of the Climate Church continue to tell lies. Is it a distraction?

# wrote Yesterday at 10:59am:
Or are you saying that nothing less than 100% will suffice?

Greggys contribution follows thus:
Considering the very, very small differences in temperature that are being reported, yes.

Wink

gotcha!

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: Hottest year on record
Reply #151 - Jan 4^th, 2014 at 5:20pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 4^th, 2014 at 5:02pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 4^th, 2014 at 4:54pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 4^th, 2014 at 4:52pm:

# wrote on Jan 4^th, 2014 at 4:49pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 4^th, 2014 at 4:34pm:

# wrote on Jan 4^th, 2014 at 2:13pm:

# wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2014 at 3:35pm:

...
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2014 at 1:16pm:

# wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2014 at 12:59pm:

Or are you saying that nothing less than 100% will suffice?

Considering the very, very small differences in temperature that are being reported, yes.

Substantiation? Link to any scientific projection with a 100% confidence level?

Still waiting, greggerypeccary. Have you been making stuff up again?

"Making stuff up"?

Not at all.
...

So where are your links to all those scientific projections with 100% confidence levels? Unless you made up the possibility.

Have you been out in the sun today?

I've never claimed that there are links to "scientific projections with 100% confidence levels".

...yet you argue that they ought to exist!

Incorrect.

You really should scroll back and read the posts properly, in order to save yourself any more embarrassment.

Okeley dokeley Shocked

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded Gold Member Offline MediocrityNET: because people died for this! Posts: 26966	Re: Hottest year on record Reply #152 - Jan 4^th, 2014 at 5:23pm True Blue... wrote on Jan 4^th, 2014 at 5:10pm: Some times you have to be embarrassed for them Greg as the Disciples from the Climate Church of ecoloons just don't seem to get IT... You can't even follow a conversation dood!
Back to top	Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) IP Logged

Laugh till you cry

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 16619
In your happy place
Gender: male

Re: Hottest year on record
Reply #153 - Jan 4^th, 2014 at 6:19pm

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 4^th, 2014 at 5:23pm:

True Blue... wrote on Jan 4^th, 2014 at 5:10pm:

Some times you have to be embarrassed for them Greg as the Disciples from the Climate Church of ecoloons just don't seem to get IT...

You can't even follow a conversation dood! Cheesy

True Blue and longweekend58 are disciples of the demented messiah George W Bush and constantly shovel blather and putrid dogma to cover their lack of intellect.

Back to top

Please don't thank me. Effusive fawning and obeisance of disciples, mendicants, and foot-kissers embarrass me.

IP Logged

#

Gold Member

Offline

A fool is certain: an
ignorant fool, absolutely
so

Posts: 2603

Re: Hottest year on record
Reply #154 - Jan 4^th, 2014 at 7:37pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2014 at 1:16pm:

# wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2014 at 12:59pm:

Or are you saying that nothing less than 100% will suffice?

Considering the very, very small differences in temperature that are being reported, yes.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 4^th, 2014 at 4:52pm:

...
I've never claimed that there are links to "scientific projections with 100% confidence levels".

So you're saying that nothing less than 100% will suffice, yet there are no links to studies with 100% confidence. Do such studies not exist or are they cleverly concealed?

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 156286
Gender: male

Re: Hottest year on record
Reply #155 - Jan 4^th, 2014 at 7:38pm

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 4^th, 2014 at 5:18pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 4^th, 2014 at 5:00pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 4^th, 2014 at 4:52pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 4^th, 2014 at 4:50pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 4^th, 2014 at 4:47pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 4^th, 2014 at 4:34pm:

# wrote on Jan 4^th, 2014 at 2:13pm:

# wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2014 at 3:35pm:

...
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2014 at 1:16pm:

# wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2014 at 12:59pm:

Or are you saying that nothing less than 100% will suffice?

Considering the very, very small differences in temperature that are being reported, yes.

Substantiation? Link to any scientific projection with a 100% confidence level?

Still waiting, greggerypeccary. Have you been making stuff up again?

"Making stuff up"?

Not at all.

You seem a tad confused.

By all means though, tell me what it is that I've "made up".

You're the one saying science should come with 100% confidence levels!

Nope, not me.

Yes you are!

Incorrect.

And you know it's incorrect, or you would have provided a link to the post where I supposedly made the claim.

Of course, you can't provide the link because the post doesn't exist.

Why do members of the Climate Church continue to tell lies. Is it a distraction?

# wrote Yesterday at 10:59am:
Or are you saying that nothing less than 100% will suffice?

Greggys contribution follows thus:
Considering the very, very small differences in temperature that are being reported, yes.

Wink

gotcha!

Nope.

No "gotcha".

Scroll back and see exactly what that was referring to.

Back to top

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles

IP Logged

#

Gold Member

Offline

A fool is certain: an
ignorant fool, absolutely
so

Posts: 2603

Re: Hottest year on record
Reply #156 - Jan 4^th, 2014 at 7:41pm

# wrote on Jan 4^th, 2014 at 1:10pm:

# wrote on Jan 4^th, 2014 at 10:57am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2014 at 9:41pm:

# wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2014 at 8:28pm:

Mine is a world of probabilities.

Yet, you completely ignore the probability that AGW may not be real.
...

You confuse probability and possibility. All things are possible; including that the vast majority of the best qualified and every organisation of reputable scientists is wrong.

As I said, mine is a world of probabilities. What evidence can you present to support your contention that the probability that they're wrong* is higher than the probability that they're right*?

* Crude binary, pandering to your limited Conservative mind.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 4^th, 2014 at 11:32am:

...
Nope, no confusion.

And, as I said, yours is not a world of probabilities: yours is a world of closed-minded, blind faith.

It looks to me like you're the one with the blind faith. You are a church-goer, aren't you, greggerypeccary?

So outline your understanding of the difference between possibility and probability.

You say there's a probability that AGW is not real. So what is that probability?

What is the probability that the vast majority of the best qualified and every organisation of reputable scientists is wrong*? How does it compare with the probability that they're right*?

Present your evidence.

* Crude binary, pandering to your limited Conservative mind.

No evidence then, greggerypeccary?

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 156286
Gender: male

Re: Hottest year on record
Reply #157 - Jan 4^th, 2014 at 7:42pm

# wrote on Jan 4^th, 2014 at 7:37pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2014 at 1:16pm:

# wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2014 at 12:59pm:

Or are you saying that nothing less than 100% will suffice?

Considering the very, very small differences in temperature that are being reported, yes.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 4^th, 2014 at 4:52pm:

...
I've never claimed that there are links to "scientific projections with 100% confidence levels".

So you're saying that nothing less than 100% will suffice ...

In relation to "scientific projections", no.

I'm not saying that at all.

That's just some bullshit you've made up in order to create a distraction.

You said it, not me.

Sorry bud.

Back to top

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles

IP Logged

#

Gold Member

Offline

A fool is certain: an
ignorant fool, absolutely
so

Posts: 2603

Re: Hottest year on record
Reply #158 - Jan 4^th, 2014 at 7:45pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 4^th, 2014 at 7:42pm:

# wrote on Jan 4^th, 2014 at 7:37pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2014 at 1:16pm:

# wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2014 at 12:59pm:

Or are you saying that nothing less than 100% will suffice?

Considering the very, very small differences in temperature that are being reported, yes.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 4^th, 2014 at 4:52pm:

...
I've never claimed that there are links to "scientific projections with 100% confidence levels".

So you're saying that nothing less than 100% will suffice ...

In relation to "scientific projections", no.
...

So you accept scientific projections of less than 100% certainty?

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 156286
Gender: male

Re: Hottest year on record
Reply #159 - Jan 4^th, 2014 at 7:48pm

# wrote on Jan 4^th, 2014 at 7:45pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 4^th, 2014 at 7:42pm:

# wrote on Jan 4^th, 2014 at 7:37pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2014 at 1:16pm:

# wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2014 at 12:59pm:

Or are you saying that nothing less than 100% will suffice?

Considering the very, very small differences in temperature that are being reported, yes.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 4^th, 2014 at 4:52pm:

...
I've never claimed that there are links to "scientific projections with 100% confidence levels".

So you're saying that nothing less than 100% will suffice ...

In relation to "scientific projections", no.
...

So you accept scientific projections of less than 100% certainty?

They exist, of course.

I've never said anything to the contrary.

Back to top

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles

IP Logged

#

Gold Member

Offline

A fool is certain: an
ignorant fool, absolutely
so

Posts: 2603

Re: Hottest year on record
Reply #160 - Jan 4^th, 2014 at 7:50pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 4^th, 2014 at 7:48pm:

# wrote on Jan 4^th, 2014 at 7:45pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 4^th, 2014 at 7:42pm:

# wrote on Jan 4^th, 2014 at 7:37pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2014 at 1:16pm:

# wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2014 at 12:59pm:

Or are you saying that nothing less than 100% will suffice?

Considering the very, very small differences in temperature that are being reported, yes.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 4^th, 2014 at 4:52pm:

...
I've never claimed that there are links to "scientific projections with 100% confidence levels".

So you're saying that nothing less than 100% will suffice ...

In relation to "scientific projections", no.
...

So you accept scientific projections of less than 100% certainty?

They exist, of course.
...

Your evasion highlights your dishonesty.

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 156286
Gender: male

Re: Hottest year on record
Reply #161 - Jan 4^th, 2014 at 7:55pm

# wrote on Jan 4^th, 2014 at 7:50pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 4^th, 2014 at 7:48pm:

# wrote on Jan 4^th, 2014 at 7:45pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 4^th, 2014 at 7:42pm:

# wrote on Jan 4^th, 2014 at 7:37pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2014 at 1:16pm:

# wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2014 at 12:59pm:

Or are you saying that nothing less than 100% will suffice?

Considering the very, very small differences in temperature that are being reported, yes.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 4^th, 2014 at 4:52pm:

...
I've never claimed that there are links to "scientific projections with 100% confidence levels".

So you're saying that nothing less than 100% will suffice ...

In relation to "scientific projections", no.
...

So you accept scientific projections of less than 100% certainty?

They exist, of course.
...

Your evasion highlights your dishonesty.

au contraire

The only one being dishonest in this thread is you.

You made up a complete and utter lie about me.

I caught you out on it.

And now you're trying to cause a distraction.

Too late: you have been exposed as nothing more than a liar who will do or say anything to promote your religion.

Better luck next time.

Back to top

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles

IP Logged

Andrei.Hicks

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23818
Carlsbad, CA
Gender: male

Re: Hottest year on record
Reply #162 - Jan 4^th, 2014 at 8:01pm

Laugh till you cry wrote on Jan 4^th, 2014 at 6:19pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 4^th, 2014 at 5:23pm:

True Blue... wrote on Jan 4^th, 2014 at 5:10pm:

Some times you have to be embarrassed for them Greg as the Disciples from the Climate Church of ecoloons just don't seem to get IT...

You can't even follow a conversation dood! Cheesy

True Blue and longweekend58 are disciples of the demented messiah George W Bush and constantly shovel blather and putrid dogma to cover their lack of intellect.

I think the Church of Climate Change Hysteria are equally as guilty of blindly following and not appreciating underhand forces at place.

Last year at the American Oil Producer Conference there was an interesting set of slides shown to the audience.

75% of the scientists proclaiming doomsday messages about human made climate impact are significant investors in projects which directly benefit from hysterical messages of change.

In Wall St, if you give out messages which deliberately entice investment and benefit companies in which you are investors, you go to jail.
It's called "stacking the deck".

Think - Invest in alternative energy project + Give out deliberately alarmist message on climate change = Increased return and investment in your project.

If we in the traditional energy sector do the same thing, we are hung out to dry.

Back to top

Anyone who lives within their means suffers from a lack of imagination - Oscar Wilde

IP Logged

Andrei.Hicks Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 23818 Carlsbad, CA Gender:	Re: Hottest year on record Reply #163 - Jan 4^th, 2014 at 8:05pm Just as an aside,the rate of temperature increase on the Planet Mars has been comparable with Planet Earth. The answer for Mars is solar related. Earth's on the other hand is caused by people. Or so they will tell us.
Back to top	Anyone who lives within their means suffers from a lack of imagination - Oscar Wilde IP Logged

# Gold Member Offline A fool is certain: an ignorant fool, absolutely so Posts: 2603	Re: Hottest year on record Reply #164 - Jan 4^th, 2014 at 8:08pm greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 4^th, 2014 at 7:55pm: ... You made up a complete and utter lie about me. ... What lie?
Back to top	IP Logged