Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6
Send Topic Print
NASA scientists embarrassed by misrepresentations. (Read 6894 times)
True Blue...
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3748
Gender: male
Re: NASA scientists embarrassed by misrepresentations.
Reply #30 - Jan 4th, 2014 at 11:55am
 
central issues in the global warming debate. Then, by carefully parsing the language of their survey questions and their published results, the alarmists encourage the media and fellow global warming alarmists to cite these biased, subjective, totally irrelevant surveys as conclusive evidence for the lie that nearly all scientists believe humans are creating a global warming crisis.

These biased, misleading, and totally irrelevant “surveys” form the best “evidence” global warming alarmists can muster in the global warming debate. And this truly shows how embarrassingly feeble their alarmist theory really is.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2013/05/30/global-warming-alarmists-caug...
Back to top
 

"Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy"

Benjamin Franklin
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: NASA scientists embarrassed by misrepresentations.
Reply #31 - Jan 4th, 2014 at 12:01pm
 
buzzanddidj wrote on Jan 4th, 2014 at 9:28am:
longweekend58 wrote on Jan 4th, 2014 at 7:22am:
Laugh till you cry wrote on Jan 3rd, 2014 at 5:11pm:
True Blue and Longweekend58 are more embarrassed than anybody about this issue. They have been forced to do a lot of defensive shovelling and they are tired and emotional.



embarrassed by what?  a letter co-signed by some of the most educated and influential scientists and engineers of our time?




Does this "letter" actually EXIST ?
The site is NOTORIUS for publishing unverified
BULLSH!T

It seems to have stolen the "crown" from rense.com








yes it exists and was published in the MSM at the time. and the site you refer to is not notorious at all - just controversial because it refutes so much ACC nonsense.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
Life_goes_on
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 4772
400kms south of Yobsville, Qld
Gender: male
Re: NASA scientists embarrassed by misrepresentations.
Reply #32 - Jan 4th, 2014 at 12:06pm
 
Quote:
and the site you refer to is not notorious at all - just controversial because it refutes so much ACC nonsense.


That's exactly what I've been saying for years about David Irving's Holocaust Truth site.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jan 4th, 2014 at 12:11pm by Life_goes_on »  

"You're just one lucky motherf-cker" - Someone, 5th February 2013

Num num num num.
 
IP Logged
 
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: NASA scientists embarrassed by misrepresentations.
Reply #33 - Jan 4th, 2014 at 12:06pm
 
# wrote on Jan 4th, 2014 at 10:46am:
Soren wrote on Jan 3rd, 2014 at 8:47pm:
...
Nevertheless, nobody has established the causal connection between human activity and this particular cycle of climate change.
...
To establish your credibility, just link to a statement by any organisation of reputable scientists, supporting your assertion.



You say the causal connection has been established. Show us then.
I say it has not. How can I link to something that doesn't exist?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
buzzanddidj
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 14248
Eganstown, via Daylesford, VIC
Gender: male
Re: NASA scientists embarrassed by misrepresentations.
Reply #34 - Jan 4th, 2014 at 12:10pm
 
It's propaganda BOMBARDMENT time



...




Back to top
 

'I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians.
Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.'


- Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi
 
IP Logged
 
#
Gold Member
*****
Offline


A fool is certain: an
ignorant fool, absolutely
so

Posts: 2603
Re: NASA scientists embarrassed by misrepresentations.
Reply #35 - Jan 4th, 2014 at 1:38pm
 
True Blue... wrote on Jan 4th, 2014 at 11:55am:
central issues in the global warming debate. Then, by carefully parsing the language of their survey questions and their published results, the alarmists encourage the media and fellow global warming alarmists to cite these biased, subjective, totally irrelevant surveys as conclusive evidence for the lie that nearly all scientists believe humans are creating a global warming crisis.

These biased, misleading, and totally irrelevant “surveys” form the best “evidence” global warming alarmists can muster in the global warming debate. And this truly shows how embarrassingly feeble their alarmist theory really is.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2013/05/30/global-warming-alarmists-caug...
Authored by: Quote:
Attorney James M. Taylor is managing editor of Environment & Climate News, a national monthly publication produced by the Heartland Institute think tank, and devoted to "sound science and free-market environmentalism," which labels the scientific consensus on climate change as "alarmist." He is also a Senior Fellow for Heartland

An article authored by a denialist think tank; can't you do better than that?.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: NASA scientists embarrassed by misrepresentations.
Reply #36 - Jan 5th, 2014 at 7:32am
 
there remains however the ACC hysterics most potent Achilles heel....

WHERE IS THE WARMING????  it hasn't warmed for 17 years now.  so WHERE IS THE WARMING?  you don't need to be any kind of scientist at all to debunk a hypothesis  that predicts massive warming and sea rises and then has nothing happen at all.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
#
Gold Member
*****
Offline


A fool is certain: an
ignorant fool, absolutely
so

Posts: 2603
Re: NASA scientists embarrassed by misrepresentations.
Reply #37 - Jan 5th, 2014 at 8:43am
 
longweekend58 wrote on Jan 5th, 2014 at 7:32am:
there remains however the ACC hysterics most potent Achilles heel....

WHERE IS THE WARMING????  it hasn't warmed for 17 years now.  so WHERE IS THE WARMING?  you don't need to be any kind of scientist at all to debunk a hypothesis  that predicts massive warming and sea rises and then has nothing happen at all.

Debunking the persistent myth that global warming stopped in 1998

September 27, 2013

Sophie Lewis

The latest climate change denial claim ahead of the release of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change assessment report is that global warming stopped in 1998. A slowing in the observed rate of global warming has prompted dubious suggestions that temperatures have not increased significantly in the past 15 years.

It's true that after rising rapidly in the 1990s, global average temperature increases at the earth's surface have slowed since 1998. But warming hasn't stopped.

The past decade was the hottest on record globally. Each year from 2000 to 2010, except 2008, was in the 10 warmest recorded globally.

...
Global surface air temperature. Photo: Matthew Absalom-Wong


What's most concerning is that it should be considerably cooler than average, not hotter. Since 1997, several natural climate factors have aligned that should have produced a discernible cooling effect on global temperatures.

A lull in solar activity from 2005 to 2010, combined with two very strong La Niña episodes from 2010 to 2012, would be expected to produce a strong decrease in global temperatures.

Yet the world hasn't cooled. On the contrary, global surface temperatures are moving in the opposite direction to natural climate variations, due to greenhouse gas warming.

To understand recent changes in the rate of heating, we need to look beyond surface temperatures. Warming at the earth's surface is a narrow measure of climatic change, with only a fraction of greenhouse gas warming heating the two meters above the ground encompassed by surface thermometers.

Ocean heat content provides a more comprehensive measure of global warming, because the oceans are vast heat reservoirs. The oceans absorb about 93 per cent of the additional heat trapped in the atmosphere by greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide.

Recent studies show that natural cooling in the Pacific Ocean has counteracted some of the warming effect of greenhouse gases as heat is pumped down into the deep ocean.

Changes in the Pacific Decadal Oscillation can help explain the slowing of warming at the surface. This is a natural ocean cycle that plays out over decades and has been in a cooling phase since 1998.

There have been several similar decades in the recent past when the rate of surface warming slowed. But after each of these ended, there was a marked ramp up in heating at the surface.

Greenhouse gas warming certainly won't be linear, with the same increase in heat recorded in each successive decade. But the overall trend is clear – global warming hasn't paused and the climate system continues to warm.
...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Innocent bystander
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 4220
Gender: male
Re: NASA scientists embarrassed by misrepresentations.
Reply #38 - Jan 5th, 2014 at 9:47am
 
...


The fact that jellyfish have survived climate extremes far worse than what we are experiencing now for millions of years should be great news for climate cranks too  Grin
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
progressiveslol
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17029
Re: NASA scientists embarrassed by misrepresentations.
Reply #39 - Jan 5th, 2014 at 10:00am
 
# wrote on Jan 5th, 2014 at 8:43am:
longweekend58 wrote on Jan 5th, 2014 at 7:32am:
there remains however the ACC hysterics most potent Achilles heel....

WHERE IS THE WARMING????  it hasn't warmed for 17 years now.  so WHERE IS THE WARMING?  you don't need to be any kind of scientist at all to debunk a hypothesis  that predicts massive warming and sea rises and then has nothing happen at all.

Debunking the persistent myth that global warming stopped in 1998

September 27, 2013

Sophie Lewis

The latest climate change denial claim ahead of the release of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change assessment report is that global warming stopped in 1998. A slowing in the observed rate of global warming has prompted dubious suggestions that temperatures have not increased significantly in the past 15 years.

It's true that after rising rapidly in the 1990s, global average temperature increases at the earth's surface have slowed since 1998. But warming hasn't stopped.

The past decade was the hottest on record globally. Each year from 2000 to 2010, except 2008, was in the 10 warmest recorded globally.

http://images.smh.com.au/2013/09/27/4782193/729climateGraph-620x349.jpg
Global surface air temperature. Photo: Matthew Absalom-Wong


What's most concerning is that it should be considerably cooler than average, not hotter. Since 1997, several natural climate factors have aligned that should have produced a discernible cooling effect on global temperatures.

A lull in solar activity from 2005 to 2010, combined with two very strong La Niña episodes from 2010 to 2012, would be expected to produce a strong decrease in global temperatures.

Yet the world hasn't cooled. On the contrary, global surface temperatures are moving in the opposite direction to natural climate variations, due to greenhouse gas warming.

To understand recent changes in the rate of heating, we need to look beyond surface temperatures. Warming at the earth's surface is a narrow measure of climatic change, with only a fraction of greenhouse gas warming heating the two meters above the ground encompassed by surface thermometers.

Ocean heat content provides a more comprehensive measure of global warming, because the oceans are vast heat reservoirs. The oceans absorb about 93 per cent of the additional heat trapped in the atmosphere by greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide.

Recent studies show that natural cooling in the Pacific Ocean has counteracted some of the warming effect of greenhouse gases as heat is pumped down into the deep ocean.

Changes in the Pacific Decadal Oscillation can help explain the slowing of warming at the surface. This is a natural ocean cycle that plays out over decades and has been in a cooling phase since 1998.

There have been several similar decades in the recent past when the rate of surface warming slowed. But after each of these ended, there was a marked ramp up in heating at the surface.

Greenhouse gas warming certainly won't be linear, with the same increase in heat recorded in each successive decade. But the overall trend is clear – global warming hasn't paused and the climate system continues to warm.
http://www.funniestmemes.com/wp-content/uploads/Funniest_Memes_the-fact-that-jel...

You cant seem to find graphs that arent manipulated to get rid of the 30's heat. Pathetic
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
#
Gold Member
*****
Offline


A fool is certain: an
ignorant fool, absolutely
so

Posts: 2603
Re: NASA scientists embarrassed by misrepresentations.
Reply #40 - Jan 5th, 2014 at 10:02am
 
progressiveslol wrote on Jan 5th, 2014 at 10:00am:
...
You cant seem to find graphs that arent manipulated to get rid of the 30's heat. ...

Of course; it's all a conspiracy, isn't it? Aaaall a conspiracy.  Roll Eyes
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: NASA scientists embarrassed by misrepresentations.
Reply #41 - Jan 5th, 2014 at 10:05am
 
This is a lesson that we all need to pay heed to. It concerns the effect of climatology on dinosaurs and the part that dinosaurs play in the great unwashed climate debate waffle.

I mean honestly, what is their argument?  - They are the great rocket scientists from NASA's Golden Age who.....used to know stuff until their brains rotted?

...
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jan 5th, 2014 at 10:15am by muso »  

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: NASA scientists embarrassed by misrepresentations.
Reply #42 - Jan 5th, 2014 at 10:10am
 
# wrote on Jan 4th, 2014 at 1:38pm:
Authored by: Quote:
Attorney James M. Taylor is managing editor of Environment & Climate News, a national monthly publication produced by the Heartland Institute think tank, and devoted to "sound science and free-market environmentalism," which labels the scientific consensus on climate change as "alarmist." He is also a Senior Fellow for Heartland
Quote:
An article authored by a denialist think tank; can't you do better than that?.


They will probably benefit from having an attorney as a leader.  One day they might need him.
Back to top
 

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
buzzanddidj
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 14248
Eganstown, via Daylesford, VIC
Gender: male
Re: NASA scientists embarrassed by misrepresentations.
Reply #43 - Jan 5th, 2014 at 11:12am
 
longweekend58 wrote on Jan 5th, 2014 at 7:32am:
WHERE IS THE WARMING????  it hasn't warmed for 17 years now.  so WHERE IS THE WARMING? 










longweekend58 wrote on Oct 14th, 2013 at 3:45pm:
buzzanddidj wrote on Oct 14th, 2013 at 3:38pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Oct 14th, 2013 at 12:52pm:
its not getting hotter and hotter.  it hasn't gotten warmer for 17 year(s}








You're STILL trying to flog THAT old furphy ?






If you were engaging in social media this past weekend, you might have found an October 13, 2012 article suggesting that global warming stopped 16 years ago.

David Rose of the Daily Mail wrote it. The article says the UK Met Office sent out a news release saying its data showed that global warming has stopped and that there is no “discernible rise in aggregate global temperatures.”

It now comes to light
that this information is not true.


The UK Met Office did not release a statement suggesting that “global warming stopped 16 years ago.” The UK Met Office, in fact, disavows any association with Mr. Rose and his article and says it was never asked any questions regarding the actual science of climate change and global warming by Mr. Rose



more ...


http://earthsky.org/earth/uk-met-office-responds-global-warming-did-not-stop-16-...








its not a furphy at all.  it is in fact established fact as the IPCC itself admitted







The IPCC "admitted" NO SUCH THING


Their research data has shown that whilst the rate of increase has decreased slightly ( ... put down to the El Niño and La Niña cycle) global average temperatures have continued to INCREASE, regardless - and
sea levels CONTINUE TO RISE



... not that sea level rises should concern the climate change denial collective
Any rise in sea levels will simply ( and SURELY) just run of the edge of the world ?





...






Back to top
 

'I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians.
Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.'


- Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi
 
IP Logged
 
progressiveslol
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17029
Re: NASA scientists embarrassed by misrepresentations.
Reply #44 - Jan 5th, 2014 at 11:32am
 
# wrote on Jan 5th, 2014 at 10:02am:
progressiveslol wrote on Jan 5th, 2014 at 10:00am:
...
You cant seem to find graphs that arent manipulated to get rid of the 30's heat. ...

Of course; it's all a conspiracy, isn't it? Aaaall a conspiracy.  Roll Eyes

So tell us oh wise climate freak. Where is the heat from the 30's in your graph or are you overtaken by the BS you spread, not to even realise the 30's were as hot as it is today

Do you even realise the temp\ trend in Antartica is on a downward trend, not an up. I bet you dont, just like the propaganda ship stuck in the ice. The ship of fools looking for the lost ice and they found it lol.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6
Send Topic Print