Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
Don't New A New Tax On Taking Family To Doctor. (Read 1737 times)
imcrookonit
Ex Member
*



Don't New A New Tax On Taking Family To Doctor.
Dec 30th, 2013 at 5:52am
 
GP fee would 'clog up' hospitals: Labor

Date
    December 29, 2013


Labor says a $5 fee for bulk-billed GP visits would put extra pressure on the public health system by clogging up hospital emergency departments, labelling the idea a "tax on taking your sick child to the doctor".   Sad

The federal government has refused to "speculate" about a proposal to make patients pay the fee after a national Commission of Audit received a proposal for a co-payment scheme for GP consultations.

But doctor groups have criticised such a move, claiming it would destroy Medicare and limit access to GPs for some community groups.

Speaking on Sunday, acting opposition leader Penny Wong said a "real problem" with the approach was that it risked "clogging up our emergency departments in our public hospital system".      Sad


"What we don't need is a new tax on taking your family to the doctor and what we don't need is more pressure on our public hospital system," senator Wong said in Adelaide.    

She said the idea represented "another broken promise from this Prime Minister".      Angry

"He (Tony Abbott) said no new taxes and now today we've got a tax on sick children going to the doctor."

News Corp Australia reports co-payments would see patients pay a fee for bulk-billed GP consultations, with pensioners and concession card holders exempt from the fee.

Families would also be granted up to 12 bulk-billed visits annually.

Federal Health Minister Peter Dutton said he would not comment on "speculation around what the Commission of Audit may or may not recommend".

"The commission's work is still being compiled and will be provided to the government in 2014," he said in a statement.

"The government will be able to consider any recommendations and respond after that time."

Mr Dutton said the government had committed to making sure the health system was sustainable and accessible in the future.

Acting Greens leader Senator Richard Di Natale said on Sunday it was a step towards a two-tiered US-style health system and away from universal healthcare.

Dr Con Costa, of the Doctors' Reform Society, said a GP fee would make emergency departments busier.   Sad

"Introducing a $5 co-payment is false cost-savings," he said in a statement.    

Australian Medical Association (AMA) president Dr Steve Hambleton said the majority of visits to the GP were very "reasonable and helpful" with only a minority causing doctors to ask why they came.

A co-payment scheme was introduced under the Hawke government in the 1990s but was scrapped.

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/gp-fee-would-clog-up-hospitals-labor-20131229-301o0.html#ixzz2otXkvhhM
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
imcrookonit
Ex Member
*



Re: Don't New A New Tax On Taking Family To Doctor.
Reply #1 - Dec 30th, 2013 at 5:56am
 
Well said Penny Wong.  Yes you must try and put a stop to this new tax.   Sad      
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Armchair_Politician
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 29167
Gender: male
Re: Don't New A New Tax On Taking Family To Doctor.
Reply #2 - Dec 30th, 2013 at 6:26am
 
What we didn't need, Penny, was an incompetent Treasurer spending our money like a drunken sailor and borrowing as if he had an unlimited credit limit. What we didn't need, Penny, was an incompetent & sexist PM introducing a carbon tax without a mandate and scaring off investment in this country and killing off the auto industry. What we didn't need, Penny, was a PM to play populist politics that would lead to more than 1,000 people dying at sea and the cost of securing our northern borders blowing out to nearly $2bn per year. What we didn't need, Penny, was six years of Labor waste, incompetence, in-fighting and colossal debt. If the former ALP government had been even half-competent, this fee would likely not even be being considered.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
____
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male
Re: Don't New A New Tax On Taking Family To Doctor.
Reply #3 - Dec 30th, 2013 at 6:31am
 
The adults are in charge and now they want to pay filthy rich to have babies and charge struggling parents to take their babies to a doctor.

The cons are fundamentally flawed in their thinking ~ punishing the working class while subside the wealthy.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Armchair_Politician
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 29167
Gender: male
Re: Don't New A New Tax On Taking Family To Doctor.
Reply #4 - Dec 30th, 2013 at 6:32am
 
____ wrote on Dec 30th, 2013 at 6:31am:
The adults are in charge and now they want to pay filthy rich women to have babies and charge struggling parents to take their babies to a doctor.

The cons are fundamentally flawed in their thinking ~ punishing the working class while subside the wealthy.


Hang on, if they are rich, wouldn't they own a shower and hence, not be filthy?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
____
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male
Re: Don't New A New Tax On Taking Family To Doctor.
Reply #5 - Dec 30th, 2013 at 6:35am
 
Armchair_Politician wrote on Dec 30th, 2013 at 6:32am:
____ wrote on Dec 30th, 2013 at 6:31am:
The adults are in charge and now they want to pay filthy rich women to have babies and charge struggling parents to take their babies to a doctor.

The cons are fundamentally flawed in their thinking ~ punishing the working class while subside the wealthy.


Hang on, if they are rich, wouldn't they own a shower and hence, not be filthy?




So you don't disagree that the cons have their priorities wrong … you are more worried about how the rich shower.

Small things amuse small minds.


Taxing people to take their children to a doctor has long term ramifications for society and the budget's bottom line.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Armchair_Politician
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 29167
Gender: male
Re: Don't New A New Tax On Taking Family To Doctor.
Reply #6 - Dec 30th, 2013 at 6:38am
 
____ wrote on Dec 30th, 2013 at 6:35am:
Armchair_Politician wrote on Dec 30th, 2013 at 6:32am:
____ wrote on Dec 30th, 2013 at 6:31am:
The adults are in charge and now they want to pay filthy rich women to have babies and charge struggling parents to take their babies to a doctor.

The cons are fundamentally flawed in their thinking ~ punishing the working class while subside the wealthy.


Hang on, if they are rich, wouldn't they own a shower and hence, not be filthy?




So you don't disagree that the cons have their priorities wrong … you are more worried about how the rich shower.

Small things amuse small minds.


Taxing people to take their children to a doctor has long term ramifications for society and the budget's bottom line.



Yes, I agree. The con-artist ALP have their priorities wrong.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
____
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male
Re: Don't New A New Tax On Taking Family To Doctor.
Reply #7 - Dec 30th, 2013 at 6:41am
 
Armchair_Politician wrote on Dec 30th, 2013 at 6:38am:
____ wrote on Dec 30th, 2013 at 6:35am:
Armchair_Politician wrote on Dec 30th, 2013 at 6:32am:
____ wrote on Dec 30th, 2013 at 6:31am:
The adults are in charge and now they want to pay filthy rich women to have babies and charge struggling parents to take their babies to a doctor.

The cons are fundamentally flawed in their thinking ~ punishing the working class while subside the wealthy.


Hang on, if they are rich, wouldn't they own a shower and hence, not be filthy?




So you don't disagree that the cons have their priorities wrong … you are more worried about how the rich shower.

Small things amuse small minds.


Taxing people to take their children to a doctor has long term ramifications for society and the budget's bottom line.



Yes, I agree. The con-artist ALP have their priorities wrong.



Yet it's the economic illiterate abbott that is wanting new taxes against the weakest and sick of our society.

How to judge a government is how they treat the weakest of society … and abbott mob has already failed this test.

Stop taxing sick children.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Armchair_Politician
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 29167
Gender: male
Re: Don't New A New Tax On Taking Family To Doctor.
Reply #8 - Dec 30th, 2013 at 6:43am
 
____ wrote on Dec 30th, 2013 at 6:41am:
Armchair_Politician wrote on Dec 30th, 2013 at 6:38am:
____ wrote on Dec 30th, 2013 at 6:35am:
Armchair_Politician wrote on Dec 30th, 2013 at 6:32am:
____ wrote on Dec 30th, 2013 at 6:31am:
The adults are in charge and now they want to pay filthy rich women to have babies and charge struggling parents to take their babies to a doctor.

The cons are fundamentally flawed in their thinking ~ punishing the working class while subside the wealthy.


Hang on, if they are rich, wouldn't they own a shower and hence, not be filthy?




So you don't disagree that the cons have their priorities wrong … you are more worried about how the rich shower.

Small things amuse small minds.


Taxing people to take their children to a doctor has long term ramifications for society and the budget's bottom line.



Yes, I agree. The con-artist ALP have their priorities wrong.



Yet it's the economic illiterate abbott that is wanting new taxes against the weakest and sick of our society.

How to judge a government is how they treat the weakest of society … and abbott mob has already failed this test.

Stop taxing sick children.


Labor & the Greens should've supported axing the carbon dioxide tax. After all, carbon dioxide is an essential element to life on Earth. What does Labor and the Greens have against life on Earth, hmmm??? Stop taxing life on Earth! Huh
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
____
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male
Re: Don't New A New Tax On Taking Family To Doctor.
Reply #9 - Dec 30th, 2013 at 6:48am
 
Armchair_Politician wrote on Dec 30th, 2013 at 6:43am:
____ wrote on Dec 30th, 2013 at 6:41am:
Armchair_Politician wrote on Dec 30th, 2013 at 6:38am:
____ wrote on Dec 30th, 2013 at 6:35am:
Armchair_Politician wrote on Dec 30th, 2013 at 6:32am:
____ wrote on Dec 30th, 2013 at 6:31am:
The adults are in charge and now they want to pay filthy rich women to have babies and charge struggling parents to take their babies to a doctor.

The cons are fundamentally flawed in their thinking ~ punishing the working class while subside the wealthy.


Hang on, if they are rich, wouldn't they own a shower and hence, not be filthy?




So you don't disagree that the cons have their priorities wrong … you are more worried about how the rich shower.

Small things amuse small minds.


Taxing people to take their children to a doctor has long term ramifications for society and the budget's bottom line.



Yes, I agree. The con-artist ALP have their priorities wrong.



Yet it's the economic illiterate abbott that is wanting new taxes against the weakest and sick of our society.

How to judge a government is how they treat the weakest of society … and abbott mob has already failed this test.

Stop taxing sick children.


Labor & the Greens should've supported axing the carbon dioxide tax. After all, carbon dioxide is an essential element to life on Earth. What does Labor and the Greens have against life on Earth, hmmm??? Stop taxing life on Earth! Huh



Best you can do light weight?


Abbott is taxing sick children and I hope people with families remember this when Abbott is forced to a DD this term.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
salad in
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5941
Re: Don't New A New Tax On Taking Family To Doctor.
Reply #10 - Dec 30th, 2013 at 6:54am
 
Will this $5 fee eat into the cost of playing bingo at the local club?

Quote:
HOI & BINGO

Join in all the fun and win terrific prizes. All Hoi and Bingo sessions are held in The Starlight Room.

HOI

Played similar to Bingo but with symbols instead of numbers.  Hoi is a fun alternative to regular Bingo.


Wednesday: 11am

($1 per card)

BINGO

Win a great selection of prizes including vouchers, groceries and meat trays at Bingo.

Tuesday: 7pm

Friday: 11am

(2 games: $3, a book of 4: $4, a book of 6: $5)


http://www.wentyleagues.com.au/promotions/bingocashhousie


Money for bingo or should I use that money to see the doctor? I'm having trouble sorting out my priorities. Some thinking music please...............
Back to top
 

The ALP, the progressive party, the party of ideas, the workers' friend, is the only Australian political party to roast four young Australians in roof cavities. SHAME! SHAME! SHAME!
 
IP Logged
 
____
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male
Re: Don't New A New Tax On Taking Family To Doctor.
Reply #11 - Dec 30th, 2013 at 6:57am
 
This child tax is more aimed against the religious who have large families … religious families like catholics.

Is abbott turning anti catholic. He is now in office so can drop all the masks.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Armchair_Politician
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 29167
Gender: male
Re: Don't New A New Tax On Taking Family To Doctor.
Reply #12 - Dec 30th, 2013 at 7:06am
 
____ wrote on Dec 30th, 2013 at 6:48am:
Armchair_Politician wrote on Dec 30th, 2013 at 6:43am:
____ wrote on Dec 30th, 2013 at 6:41am:
Armchair_Politician wrote on Dec 30th, 2013 at 6:38am:
____ wrote on Dec 30th, 2013 at 6:35am:
Armchair_Politician wrote on Dec 30th, 2013 at 6:32am:
____ wrote on Dec 30th, 2013 at 6:31am:
The adults are in charge and now they want to pay filthy rich women to have babies and charge struggling parents to take their babies to a doctor.

The cons are fundamentally flawed in their thinking ~ punishing the working class while subside the wealthy.


Hang on, if they are rich, wouldn't they own a shower and hence, not be filthy?




So you don't disagree that the cons have their priorities wrong … you are more worried about how the rich shower.

Small things amuse small minds.


Taxing people to take their children to a doctor has long term ramifications for society and the budget's bottom line.



Yes, I agree. The con-artist ALP have their priorities wrong.



Yet it's the economic illiterate abbott that is wanting new taxes against the weakest and sick of our society.

How to judge a government is how they treat the weakest of society … and abbott mob has already failed this test.

Stop taxing sick children.


Labor & the Greens should've supported axing the carbon dioxide tax. After all, carbon dioxide is an essential element to life on Earth. What does Labor and the Greens have against life on Earth, hmmm??? Stop taxing life on Earth! Huh



Best you can do light weight?


Abbott is taxing sick children and I hope people with families remember this when Abbott is forced to a DD this term.


You're taxing every man, woman, child, dog, cat, bird in the country! Stop hating life on Earth!!!  Angry
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Armchair_Politician
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 29167
Gender: male
Re: Don't New A New Tax On Taking Family To Doctor.
Reply #13 - Dec 30th, 2013 at 7:07am
 
____ wrote on Dec 30th, 2013 at 6:57am:
This child tax is more aimed against the religious who have large families … religious families like catholics.

Is abbott turning anti catholic. He is now in office so can drop all the masks.


Grasping at straws there much? That the best you can do, lightweight?  Huh
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
____
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male
Re: Don't New A New Tax On Taking Family To Doctor.
Reply #14 - Dec 30th, 2013 at 7:11am
 
Armchair_Politician wrote on Dec 30th, 2013 at 7:06am:
____ wrote on Dec 30th, 2013 at 6:48am:
Armchair_Politician wrote on Dec 30th, 2013 at 6:43am:
____ wrote on Dec 30th, 2013 at 6:41am:
Armchair_Politician wrote on Dec 30th, 2013 at 6:38am:
____ wrote on Dec 30th, 2013 at 6:35am:
Armchair_Politician wrote on Dec 30th, 2013 at 6:32am:
____ wrote on Dec 30th, 2013 at 6:31am:
The adults are in charge and now they want to pay filthy rich women to have babies and charge struggling parents to take their babies to a doctor.

The cons are fundamentally flawed in their thinking ~ punishing the working class while subside the wealthy.


Hang on, if they are rich, wouldn't they own a shower and hence, not be filthy?




So you don't disagree that the cons have their priorities wrong … you are more worried about how the rich shower.

Small things amuse small minds.


Taxing people to take their children to a doctor has long term ramifications for society and the budget's bottom line.



Yes, I agree. The con-artist ALP have their priorities wrong.



Yet it's the economic illiterate abbott that is wanting new taxes against the weakest and sick of our society.

How to judge a government is how they treat the weakest of society … and abbott mob has already failed this test.

Stop taxing sick children.


Labor & the Greens should've supported axing the carbon dioxide tax. After all, carbon dioxide is an essential element to life on Earth. What does Labor and the Greens have against life on Earth, hmmm??? Stop taxing life on Earth! Huh



Best you can do light weight?


Abbott is taxing sick children and I hope people with families remember this when Abbott is forced to a DD this term.


You're taxing every man, woman, child, dog, cat, bird in the country! Stop hating life on Earth!!!  Angry



Making a empty claim is your only defence of the mean spirited and high taxing abbott attacking sick children.

You are not really worth replying to.

If I don't reply to your posts any more, please take it personally.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print