True Blue... wrote on Dec 23
rd, 2013 at 6:37am:
this is why i don't write much on the Political forums...
a lot of them are just rusted on idiots with their hands out for more welfare instead of going out to get a job...
"Please True Blue, can you work harder and pay more welfare to me"...
f#cken sickening...
Come on, blue - you know you are flying in the face of reality when you say 'go out and get a job' - some genuine people have been trying for years. I'd manage to exist with five hours a week pulling piss at the RSL - chatting to a staff member I know last night and he said he's working 60 hours and tired.
Well - bugger me!
And you also know that welfare is not the major issue in the economy - what is the major issue is WHERE and HOW governments spend money - for which it is high time we received a full accounting, piece by piece - so the brighter souls among us can work out the problems for them - since they can't.
Clive's coal will generate no more than about
1200 claimed 2460 after construction limited time jobs -
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/mining-energy/clive-palmer-mine-rail-pr...- will off-shore massive profits that will be untouched by tax, while paving the way for Clive to more billions on which he will not pay tax, while actually raising the cost of imported goods here in a zero-competition market.
Even noticed that the price of steel has gone way up? Industry closes down here or 'rationalises' - sheds workers into poverty - then we buy back the same product at all elevated price - now stricken by the never-ending rise of wages and cost of living and social divides in the 'Lima Agreement' countries - until - as someone just wisely said - the price will be the same.
So where is the benefit from all this? Australians first or the ROTW first?
I'm building a house on a pension - when I started I could buy roofing for $7 a metre - it is now $12 - we REALLY benefited from off-shoring all that industry, didn't we? Because 'wages here are too high'???
Well - sorry to tell you - wages + cost of transport + cost to Australia of exporting raw materials to benefit the pockets of seven people = HIGHER COSTS and FEWER PEOPLE WITH MONEY TO BUY.
Now that's got to be the wackiest 'economic management' I've ever seen.
On the ideological side - same-same both sides.
Your 'progressives' want to develop a starry-eyed 'equality for humanity' across the board.. an unattainable objective since, s my dear old Economics professor said "economics is based on scarcity' That mean that when you have limited resources - and pray consider for one moment what 'resources' actually are beyond raw materials.. try people, incomes, values and so forth - you simply cannot spread them around the whole world and come up trumps.
Your 'conservatives' want to develop a mega-profit through off-shoring everything to cheapies opportunity for their mates, and by limited flow-down to an inner circle but not the rest, to themselves. How many cop a sweet deal from their mates when they retire from politics at a sweet age and ready to rumble?
Point is - no matter who is developing the One World Economy and so forth - WE who are now at the bottom, are the losers.
So buckle down - and get it right. Blue.. baby! Your enemy is over there in the big house - not those in front of you and you are trapped in a suburban nightmare of resentment and envy.