Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Poll Poll
Question: Was the Appeals Court right to acquit the owner of guilt?



« Created by: Lord Herbert on: Dec 21st, 2013 at 7:02am »

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 ... 15
Send Topic Print
The savage dogs thread ... (Read 24550 times)
mantra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


ozpolitic.com

Posts: 10750
Gender: female
Re: The savage dogs thread ...
Reply #60 - Jan 5th, 2014 at 10:52am
 
cods wrote on Jan 5th, 2014 at 8:27am:
Lord Herbert wrote on Jan 5th, 2014 at 8:19am:
"Paging Mantra to the desk please ... "

"Paging Lady Mantra ... "

"You can run but you can't hide .... "

"Lady Mantra ... Paging Lady Mantra ... "

Cool


the left equate everything to oil.. dontcha know that...of course ask them to go without OIL>. and see what happens..

Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin ;

it will be Abbott fault.


The demand for energy to feed this massive global population has become so great it's unsustainable and it makes sense that we continue to endeavour to find energy alternatives and supplements aside from oil. It is a costly commodity to access in every way. We only have to look at the oil spills, wars and pollution the use of this product creates.

Can we r ape this planet indefinitely Cods? It is becoming depleted as demand exceeds supply. Unfortunately many from the right believe in pillaging every resource they can lay their hands on regardless of the heavy cost to life and the environment along the way. It's there - just take it. Who cares about the future or the collateral damage?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Lord Herbert
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 34441
Gender: male
Re: The savage dogs thread ...
Reply #61 - Jan 5th, 2014 at 11:19am
 
mantra wrote on Jan 5th, 2014 at 10:30am:
China is the largest holder of US government debt - so it's quite obvious that China would demand a large slice of the pie.


But wouldn't it have been far more prudent for the US government to have monopolized the Iraqi oil industry while reimbursing China from its profits?

And if the US knew that its invasion of Iraq would put it into debt with China to the extent that it has ~ isn't it therefore somewhat fatuous for people to still insist that the US went into Iraq for its oil?

Half the oil production is now going to China, and the US is still left with massive debt.

How is this scenario compatible with the .. er .. mantra that the US was only interested in Iraqi oil? 

If the US oil barons were allowed by the US government to make a killing on Iraqi oil at no expense to themselves with regard to helping to finance the US war effort, then why would the government have also let them walk off with the profits while leaving the US administration up to its armpits in debt?

It doesn't make sense.

mantra wrote on Jan 5th, 2014 at 10:30am:
How do the Iraqi's benefit from their oil being controlled by the US and China? Certainly not in their current shocking standard of living. Iraq was once an advanced and cultured nation, but it's been bombed into submission and poverty.


Oh pleeeease! Iraq has been a garbage bin of pandemic poverty for yonkers ~ long before the US involvement. And Abu Graib was a genuine torture hell-hole before the Americans arrived to drape ladies panties over the heads of Saddam's soldiers by way of torture.

mantra wrote on Jan 5th, 2014 at 10:30am:
Just remember the US were mates with Saddam at one time.


Means absolutely nothing. If the US used Saddam to halt the spread of the Russians, then this didn't make him a 'friend' - only a Useful Idiot. The moment Saddam's usefulness had expired, the US made him redundant to their purposes.

mantra wrote on Jan 5th, 2014 at 10:30am:
I could argue the politics of the Iraqi war until the cows come home ...


Oh no! That's such a cheap shot! You KNOW I was given a bovine replacement aortic valve last February.

"until the cows come home ... "

I'd rUdder you didn't say things like that.

mantra wrote on Jan 5th, 2014 at 10:30am:
but typing is difficult because Ruffy is lying over my wrists and on my keyboard.


A sprawler? My Sooty doesn't do that any more. Lucky you.  Smiley
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jan 5th, 2014 at 11:25am by Lord Herbert »  
 
IP Logged
 
mantra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


ozpolitic.com

Posts: 10750
Gender: female
Re: The savage dogs thread ...
Reply #62 - Jan 5th, 2014 at 12:20pm
 
Lord Herbert wrote on Jan 5th, 2014 at 11:19am:
But wouldn't it have been far more prudent for the US government to have monopolized the Iraqi oil industry while reimbursing China from its profits?


Yes it would have been more prudent, but the US has its own oil boom currently and over the past few years appear to have lost interest in Iraqi oil. Of course this doesn't make much sense economically, but when have the US ever been good economic managers? The US administration jumps in feet first when the big boys put pressure on them and then later decide that maybe it wasn't such a good move. The people pay for the errors of their leaders and not just in the US.

Lord Herbert wrote on Jan 5th, 2014 at 11:19am:
And if the US knew that its invasion of Iraq would put it into debt with China to the extent that it has ~ isn't it therefore somewhat fatuous for people to still insist that the US went into Iraq for its oil?

Half the oil production is now going to China, and the US is still left with massive debt.


Their huge debt wasn't accumulated just because of the Iraq invasion. The gambling prior to the GFC  took a heavy toll on their economy. Trillions were borrowed between 2000 and 2007 for investment in dodgy hedge funds and risky sub-prime mortgages. The US had to dramatically increase borrowing again to prop up their banks and other essential industries when the GFC hit.

Lord Herbert wrote on Jan 5th, 2014 at 11:19am:
If the US oil barons were allowed by the US government to make a killing on Iraqi oil at no expense to themselves with regard to helping to finance the US war effort, then why would the government have also let them walk off with the profits while leaving the US administration up to its armpits in debt?

It doesn't make sense.


The Bush administration was closely associated with the oil barons and the Saudis - the Bush family also being part of the conglomerate. Dick Cheney was a major player in Halliburton. This is only a fragment of the many reasons Iraq was invaded. The justification presented to us was a lie and this was confirmed later.

If the administration had given a stuff about the country or the people - they would have introduced some regulation and transparency into their spending and borrowing.

Lord Herbert wrote on Jan 5th, 2014 at 11:19am:
Means absolutely nothing. If the US used Saddam to halt the spread of the Russians, then this didn't make him a 'friend' - only a Useful Idiot. The moment Saddam's usefulness had expired, the US made him redundant to their purposes.


So - what were their purposes? Surely you don't believe the fable that it was to bring democracy into Iraq?

No WMD were ever found. We killed more people with our invasion than Saddam ever did.

The US have replaced one tyrant for another.

The US disregard the mess they leave behind while they're striving for some unobtainable ideology always justifying it on a false premise.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Datalife
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2405
Gender: male
Re: The savage dogs thread ...
Reply #63 - Jan 5th, 2014 at 12:43pm
 
Bob Woodwards book Bush at War should be required reading.  There were many drivers for the war, inserting a democracy was not the totality of the reason but it was a big one, nor should the oil be discounted, that as well was a big driver.

Also manipulation by the Saudis (particularly the Saud ambassador), a religious aspect by Bush himself, Rumsfelds influence, he wanted a war to prove his light army concept and he along with Cheney were PNAC advocates. 

Piggy backing onto 9/11 and the WMD UN tripwire, the sense of unfinished business from Gulf Smackdown the First, there was a lack of knowledge about the region and an expectation they would be greeted with roses, install a friendly democracy and get out.  That was never realistic but they didn't understand that.

Many drivers all related and all running concurrently and with different emphasis at different stages of the wars evolution. 

But if anyone tells you it was just about oil, you can guarantee you are looking at an idiot or at least someone without capacity for complex thought.
Back to top
 

"If they’re out there in the high seas, what you would do is seek to turn them back through the agency of the Australian Navy".

Kevin Rudd on 2GB, July 12, 2007
 
IP Logged
 
Lord Herbert
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 34441
Gender: male
Re: The savage dogs thread ...
Reply #64 - Jan 5th, 2014 at 1:42pm
 
mantra wrote on Jan 5th, 2014 at 12:20pm:
So - what were their purposes? Surely you don't believe the fable that it was to bring democracy into Iraq?


Nobody ever claimed this was the reason for invading Iraq.

And nor was the oil ~ no matter who is saying that now. Why did Iraq mk1 Operation Desert Storm end when it had the troops on the ground and the logistics all set for a push up into Iraq from the Kuwaiti border?

That would suggest they were still waiting on confirmation about WMD.
Scroll down to Richard Butler at UNSCROM. Read what he was telling anybody who would listen to him ~ including the US administration.

link

mantra wrote on Jan 5th, 2014 at 12:20pm:
No WMD were ever found.


It has been widely suspected that the weapons were trucked over the border in petrol tankers.

mantra wrote on Jan 5th, 2014 at 12:20pm:
We killed more people with our invasion than Saddam ever did.


Saddam gratuitously started a war with Iraq to bring them into the Arab fold. 8 years and over a million lives.

On the other hand, the Coalition of the Willing lost twice the men they would have done if they hadn't been ordered to protect the civilian public by fighting house-to-house without a preliminary bombardment of areas known to be infested with insurgents.

After Saddam was defeated, the CoW ground troops then began to discover police torture chambers up and down the country, and unmarked mass-graves.

And how many civilian deaths have there been now from sectarian bombings? America's fault? Hardly. It's Muslims Behaving Badly whenever there isn't a tyrant to threaten them with torture chambers and unmarked mass graves.

mantra wrote on Jan 5th, 2014 at 12:20pm:
The US have replaced one tyrant for another.


The US has installed the makings of a democracy. It's taking its baby steps now for only the first time in its history.

mantra wrote on Jan 5th, 2014 at 12:20pm:
The US disregard the mess they leave behind while they're striving for some unobtainable ideology always justifying it on a false premise.


The US continues to pour zillions into the country.

Having said the above, I no longer trust the US to make good decisions of any kind.

'YANKEE GO HOME!' just about says it for me now.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jan 5th, 2014 at 1:57pm by Lord Herbert »  
 
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88048
Re: The savage dogs thread ...
Reply #65 - Jan 6th, 2014 at 5:49am
 
Lord Herbert wrote on Jan 5th, 2014 at 10:12am:
cods wrote on Jan 5th, 2014 at 8:25am:
not disputing your intentions just your means herb thats all... one crime does not make up for another crime..and to drop bombs is not right.. is it??...


Were all those Australian soldiers who went off to war with guns in order to commit the 'crime' of murder against other human beans just as guilty as Hitler's soldiers or the Nipponese army?

The only reason you're not speaking Japanese today and working as slave-labour for Mitsubishi is because the Good Guys killed enough of the Bad Guys to make them quit.

cods wrote on Jan 5th, 2014 at 8:25am:
I said I felt sick reading that link and I still do it shocks me to the core..but what can we do about such barbarianism??


... umm ... drop a bomb on them?  Roll Eyes  Tongue

cods wrote on Jan 5th, 2014 at 8:25am:
... in the mean time nothing will bring back these people they are gone and I trust to god no one else faces that kind of torture..


The real horror is the realisation that with a huge number of just ordinary everyday people like ourselves every kind of excess would soon be practiced if there was no law to answer to.






I can only be bothered with one answer to that rant..

SOLDIERS DO NOT COMMIT MURDER...HOW DARE YOU...

would it be better to sit back in your armchair whilst the enemy came knocking at your door?????

WAR is WAR unpleasant..very.... but at least everyone knows they are at WAR...the other guy is usually armed to the teeth as well..

getting rid of a despot via a nuclear BOMB...is not exactly WAR.. not a fair one in my book..

why not just GAS everyone like Hussein did..at least that way you have a city still standing. Angry Angry
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88048
Re: The savage dogs thread ...
Reply #66 - Jan 6th, 2014 at 6:15am
 
mantra wrote on Jan 5th, 2014 at 10:52am:
cods wrote on Jan 5th, 2014 at 8:27am:
Lord Herbert wrote on Jan 5th, 2014 at 8:19am:
"Paging Mantra to the desk please ... "

"Paging Lady Mantra ... "

"You can run but you can't hide .... "

"Lady Mantra ... Paging Lady Mantra ... "

Cool


the left equate everything to oil.. dontcha know that...of course ask them to go without OIL>. and see what happens..

Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin ;

it will be Abbott fault.


The demand for energy to feed this massive global population has become so great it's unsustainable and it makes sense that we continue to endeavour to find energy alternatives and supplements aside from oil. It is a costly commodity to access in every way. We only have to look at the oil spills, wars and pollution the use of this product creates.

Can we r ape this planet indefinitely Cods? It is becoming depleted as demand exceeds supply. Unfortunately many from the right believe in pillaging every resource they can lay their hands on regardless of the heavy cost to life and the environment along the way. It's there - just take it. Who cares about the future or the collateral damage?





so only lefties thnink about the planet.. ho hum.. you didnt answer the question I notice..

do you go without using fossil fuel???... and the answer is NO YOU DONT..sorry mantra but we can all stand on soap boxes and preach..but do bugger all to change anything....

you are using a computer at this very moment.. and it all uses fossil fuel its hardly saving the PLANET you seem so worried about..god only knows how much was used to make the thing in the first place.. Roll Eyes

when I see lefties living in caves without electricity or cars or computers...let me know.. wont you I will come and see for myself..pigeons are a good way of communication  in case you have forgotten..

you are so far up yourselves... I am sure you only blame libs for any wars or devastation..

lefties all walk around with their halos in tact.. praying for the libs souls... Angry Angry

pompous lot... you actually believe your waffle... HILARIOUS>
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Lord Herbert
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 34441
Gender: male
Re: The savage dogs thread ...
Reply #67 - Jan 6th, 2014 at 7:04am
 
The Savage dogs thread ...

Can we start to get back on topic, please.

One more reply to my Iraq post from Lady Mantra and we'll call that a wrap.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
mantra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


ozpolitic.com

Posts: 10750
Gender: female
Re: The savage dogs thread ...
Reply #68 - Jan 6th, 2014 at 12:32pm
 
Lord Herbert wrote on Jan 5th, 2014 at 1:42pm:
mantra wrote on Jan 5th, 2014 at 12:20pm:
So - what were their purposes? Surely you don't believe the fable that it was to bring democracy into Iraq?


Nobody ever claimed this was the reason for invading Iraq.


Yes they did. When they didn't uncover weapons of mass destruction - the new propaganda line spruiked by Bush and Howard was that their mission was to bring democracy to Iraq.

Quote:
And nor was the oil ~ no matter who is saying that now. Why did Iraq mk1 Operation Desert Storm end when it had the troops on the ground and the logistics all set for a push up into Iraq from the Kuwaiti border?

That would suggest they were still waiting on confirmation about WMD.


Then why didn't they wait? There was never any confirmation.

Quote:
Scroll down to Richard Butler at UNSCROM. Read what he was telling anybody who would listen to him ~ including the US administration.

[url=http://en.wikipedia.org

/wiki/Richard_Butler_%28diplomat%29]link[/url]


Butler's comments were only supposition, but we were told we had to bomb Iraq because there were definitely WMD. No WMD were recovered anywhere. The WMD theory was an excuse to control Iraq and when that didn't materialise, they spruiked the democracy propaganda.

mantra wrote on Jan 5th, 2014 at 12:20pm:
No WMD were ever found.


It has been widely suspected that the weapons were trucked over the border in petrol tankers. [/quote]

More supposition. So we bombed the guts out of Iraq on a theory.

mantra wrote on Jan 5th, 2014 at 12:20pm:
We killed more people with our invasion than Saddam ever did.


Saddam gratuitously started a war with Iraq to bring them into the Arab fold. 8 years and over a million lives. [/quote]

Yet he was only charged with something like the death of 128 - small fry compared to the many deaths of soldiers and civilians Bush and Howard were responsible for.

Quote:
On the other hand, the Coalition of the Willing lost twice the men they would have done if they hadn't been ordered to protect the civilian public by fighting house-to-house without a preliminary bombardment of areas known to be infested with insurgents.


How did they protect the civilians? Bombs misfired and were also dropped indiscriminately on the advice of half baked intelligence. Thousands of innocent people were mutilated or killed.

Quote:
After Saddam was defeated, the CoW ground troops then began to discover police torture chambers up and down the country, and unmarked mass-graves.


So we were told?

Quote:
And how many civilian deaths have there been now from sectarian bombings? America's fault? Hardly. It's Muslims Behaving Badly whenever there isn't a tyrant to threaten them with torture chambers and unmarked mass graves.


Perhaps they are trying to protect their homelands? After 9/11 we certainly went to great lengths by bombing Afghanistan to bits and slaughtering thousands of civilians in order to find the great Osama who apparently wasn't even in the country.

Quote:
The US continues to pour zillions into the country.

Having said the above, I no longer trust the US to make good decisions of any kind.

'YANKEE GO HOME!' just about says it for me now.


And we agree on this Herbert.  Smiley
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
mantra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


ozpolitic.com

Posts: 10750
Gender: female
Re: The savage dogs thread ...
Reply #69 - Jan 6th, 2014 at 12:46pm
 
cods wrote on Jan 6th, 2014 at 6:15am:
mantra wrote on Jan 5th, 2014 at 10:52am:
cods wrote on Jan 5th, 2014 at 8:27am:
the left equate everything to oil.. dontcha know that...of course ask them to go without OIL>. and see what happens..

Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin ;

it will be Abbott fault.


The demand for energy to feed this massive global population has become so great it's unsustainable and it makes sense that we continue to endeavour to find energy alternatives and supplements aside from oil. It is a costly commodity to access in every way. We only have to look at the oil spills, wars and pollution the use of this product creates.

Can we r ape this planet indefinitely Cods? It is becoming depleted as demand exceeds supply. Unfortunately many from the right believe in pillaging every resource they can lay their hands on regardless of the heavy cost to life and the environment along the way. It's there - just take it. Who cares about the future or the collateral damage?


so only lefties thnink about the planet.. ho hum.. you didnt answer the question I notice..

do you go without using fossil fuel???... and the answer is NO YOU DONT..sorry mantra but we can all stand on soap boxes and preach..but do bugger all to change anything....

you are using a computer at this very moment.. and it all uses fossil fuel its hardly saving the PLANET you seem so worried about..god only knows how much was used to make the thing in the first place.. Roll Eyes

when I see lefties living in caves without electricity or cars or computers...let me know.. wont you I will come and see for myself..pigeons are a good way of communication  in case you have forgotten..

you are so far up yourselves... I am sure you only blame libs for any wars or devastation..

lefties all walk around with their halos in tact.. praying for the libs souls... Angry Angry

pompous lot... you actually believe your waffle... HILARIOUS>


You are very rude Cods so it's no surprise some people give you a hard time here. Your statement that we need to live in caves to prove that we don't need fossil fuels is unrealistic. We live in a modern world so it's about time we started implementing modern programs to develop our energy.

The Greens have always promoted alternative energy sources, but most innovations are trashed by the RW's who don't believe in global warming, solar energy, windfarms or any other sustainable alternative or supplement to oil and coal. Oil, coal and gas are finite resources only and we're tearing up nearly every inch of this planet to access them as well as leaving behind a toxic mess after every endeavour.

The global population is enormous at nearly 9 billion and we have to search for smarter and less destructive ways of sustaining it.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88048
Re: The savage dogs thread ...
Reply #70 - Jan 6th, 2014 at 4:23pm
 
mantra wrote on Jan 6th, 2014 at 12:46pm:
cods wrote on Jan 6th, 2014 at 6:15am:
mantra wrote on Jan 5th, 2014 at 10:52am:
cods wrote on Jan 5th, 2014 at 8:27am:
the left equate everything to oil.. dontcha know that...of course ask them to go without OIL>. and see what happens..

Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin ;

it will be Abbott fault.


The demand for energy to feed this massive global population has become so great it's unsustainable and it makes sense that we continue to endeavour to find energy alternatives and supplements aside from oil. It is a costly commodity to access in every way. We only have to look at the oil spills, wars and pollution the use of this product creates.

Can we r ape this planet indefinitely Cods? It is becoming depleted as demand exceeds supply. Unfortunately many from the right believe in pillaging every resource they can lay their hands on regardless of the heavy cost to life and the environment along the way. It's there - just take it. Who cares about the future or the collateral damage?


so only lefties thnink about the planet.. ho hum.. you didnt answer the question I notice..

do you go without using fossil fuel???... and the answer is NO YOU DONT..sorry mantra but we can all stand on soap boxes and preach..but do bugger all to change anything....

you are using a computer at this very moment.. and it all uses fossil fuel its hardly saving the PLANET you seem so worried about..god only knows how much was used to make the thing in the first place.. Roll Eyes

when I see lefties living in caves without electricity or cars or computers...let me know.. wont you I will come and see for myself..pigeons are a good way of communication  in case you have forgotten..

you are so far up yourselves... I am sure you only blame libs for any wars or devastation..

lefties all walk around with their halos in tact.. praying for the libs souls... Angry Angry

pompous lot... you actually believe your waffle... HILARIOUS>


You are very rude Cods so it's no surprise some people give you a hard time here. Your statement that we need to live in caves to prove that we don't need fossil fuels is unrealistic. We live in a modern world so it's about time we started implementing modern programs to develop our energy.

The Greens have always promoted alternative energy sources, but most innovations are trashed by the RW's who don't believe in global warming, solar energy, windfarms or any other sustainable alternative or supplement to oil and coal. Oil, coal and gas are finite resources only and we're tearing up nearly every inch of this planet to access them as well as leaving behind a toxic mess after every endeavour.

The global population is enormous at nearly 9 billion and we have to search for smarter and less destructive ways of sustaining it.





sorry didnt mean to sound rude.. but then you greenies are always accusing righties of doing nothing... and you really dont think you carry this burden alone do you???.. the trouble is you think throwing money at it is thats its about...oh Ive done my bit...so to speak..we brought in a CARBON TAX,

,hasnt made one iota of difference..but dont lets talk about that.

I am a great one for believing in doing as I say....not just telling everyone else to do it..

in case you havent noticed mantra the world is changing EVERY DAY>

the last i heard global pop was 6/7billion not 9bill..


its got nothing to do with what we believe... its happening anyway why dont you accept that??..


you want your bloody wind farms youve got them...

I havent seen one righty tying themselves to a fence post to stop the trillions of cement and water needed to build your wind farms..

so you do want to live in caves.. I get it.. if we stop digging coal up tomorrow there will be very little electricity.. to run homes let alone factories and and hospitals..if you had your way you would stop all that overnight... and then what??????????????..

oh thats right you dont want to put a time limit on using your computer or your tv or you car or your lawn mower.or all those electrical appliances in your house.. will you be willing to turn your fridge off for 12 hours a day..

of course not.. but you snear at all those who say.. coal is fine it has been for centuries..something will take its place eventually  its called progress...

but no we are are the sceptics the filthy  trashers of the universe..now that is rude. Sad
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88048
Re: The savage dogs thread ...
Reply #71 - Jan 6th, 2014 at 4:24pm
 
Lord Herbert wrote on Jan 6th, 2014 at 7:04am:
The Savage dogs thread ...

Can we start to get back on topic, please.

One more reply to my Iraq post from Lady Mantra and we'll call that a wrap.



oh dear I spoilt that.. how did this get onto GW anyway????

it wasnt meeeeeeeeeeeee
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Lord Herbert
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 34441
Gender: male
Re: The savage dogs thread ...
Reply #72 - Jan 6th, 2014 at 5:00pm
 
cods wrote on Jan 6th, 2014 at 5:49am:
I can only be bothered with one answer to that rant..


Grin That's all I'm allowing you ~ We're going to get back on topic any moment NOW.

cods wrote on Jan 6th, 2014 at 5:49am:
SOLDIERS DO NOT COMMIT MURDER...HOW DARE YOU...


I used the word 'murder' to copy what someone here was inferring that soldiers do.

cods wrote on Jan 6th, 2014 at 5:49am:
would it be better to sit back in your armchair whilst the enemy came knocking at your door?????


Would such a polite enema be an enemy at all? Come knocking on the door? "Excuse me sir, would you very much mind signing this petition please, that gives us control of your government?"

Quote:
"Why, no, of course not! They're useless buggers who've never done a damn thing for anybody but themselves anyway."


cods wrote on Jan 6th, 2014 at 5:49am:
why not just GAS everyone like Hussein did..at least that way you have a city still standing. Angry Angry


I KNEW you had it in you to solve the problem of the destroyed infrastructure after a nuclear bomb ... GAS! Your genius is not generally recognised, cods, but this shall change shortly. There'll be statues to you in Seoul.  Smiley
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88048
Re: The savage dogs thread ...
Reply #73 - Jan 6th, 2014 at 5:59pm
 
Lord Herbert wrote on Jan 6th, 2014 at 5:00pm:
cods wrote on Jan 6th, 2014 at 5:49am:
I can only be bothered with one answer to that rant..


Grin That's all I'm allowing you ~ We're going to get back on topic any moment NOW.

cods wrote on Jan 6th, 2014 at 5:49am:
SOLDIERS DO NOT COMMIT MURDER...HOW DARE YOU...


I used the word 'murder' to copy what someone here was inferring that soldiers do.

cods wrote on Jan 6th, 2014 at 5:49am:
would it be better to sit back in your armchair whilst the enemy came knocking at your door?????


Would such a polite enema be an enemy at all? Come knocking on the door? "Excuse me sir, would you very much mind signing this petition please, that gives us control of your government?"

Quote:
"Why, no, of course not! They're useless buggers who've never done a damn thing for anybody but themselves anyway."


cods wrote on Jan 6th, 2014 at 5:49am:
why not just GAS everyone like Hussein did..at least that way you have a city still standing. Angry Angry


I KNEW you had it in you to solve the problem of the destroyed infrastructure after a nuclear bomb ... GAS! Your genius is not generally recognised, cods, but this shall change shortly. There'll be statues to you in Seoul.  Smiley



I keep telling you I am a genius  at last RECOGNITION>>

didnt you know thats why the real nasties use GAS??..its a real bugger when you march into a city and its all flat...


anyway back to the topic.. what was it???


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Lord Herbert
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 34441
Gender: male
Re: The savage dogs thread ...
Reply #74 - Jan 6th, 2014 at 7:42pm
 
mantra wrote on Jan 6th, 2014 at 12:32pm:
And we agree on this Herbert.  Smiley


Well Hallelujah, Praise the Lord!  Smiley

Now I can get back to teaching my cats how to use the toilet bowl AND how to flush their little floaters away.

Smiley
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 ... 15
Send Topic Print