mantra wrote on Jan 10
th, 2014 at 4:44pm:
viewpoint wrote on Jan 10
th, 2014 at 3:45pm:
So you judge all breeds on the actions of a smacking guard dog in China.....and the actions of a cross bred dog your brother had? Oh yes and the articles you search out online about breeds you deem to be dangerous ......sounds a bit like your fairy tale about being a former policeman.....then you suddenly change your mind and admit you were talking crap.......no ego problem here, but you appear to have a credibility problem Herbert.
Incidentally, just because a dog is a certain breed, DOES NOT mean it's from the working bloodlines of the same breed......ie all GSDs are not working bloodlines!
Anyway, you stay with your cats mate......you should be safe there......unless you visit the zoo.....!
Can you see the irony in your post?
Angry people shouldn't own dogs renowned for aggressiveness. Yes the owners can be held partly responsible for the actions of a savage dog. If they've got a short fuse - the dog usually picks up on it and behaves accordingly.
What is ironic Mantra, is that you should chip in with the intention of making an observation mainly to derogate me, and you basically confirm what I have been saying all along, that breeds are not dangerous in themselves, they are turned that way by people who have no idea what they are doing, and in this case it would appear people who have no idea what they are talking about.
The señora is right Herbert, there is no love lost between the two of us, but I think he understands and appreciates where I'm coming from in this thread.
Anyway, time to break off my contribution to this subject. I think I'm going up against a brick wall here, therefore I'll allow you to breath a sigh of relief Herbert and maintain your educated opinion on this matter.