The model is not the important part. It's the observational data.
Models can be run retrospectively.
Part of that second link:
Quote:Is Shrinking Sea Ice Behind Chilly Spring?
Melting Arctic ice may be making winters colder and longer, scientists say.
Sea ice in the Gulf of St. Lawrence.
Sea ice forms in Canada's Gulf of St. Lawrence in February 2013.
Image courtesy Jeff Schmaltz, MODIS/USGS/NASA
Daniel Stone
National Geographic News
Published March 26, 2013
First it was the fault of Punxsutawney Phil, the groundhog who mistakenly forecasted a quick end to winter. Now climate scientists are saying that Arctic sea ice—or the lack of it—is a driving force behind the Northern Hemisphere's unseasonably cold spring.
As Northern Hemisphere temperatures remain below normal more than a week into the official start of spring, a team of meteorologists and climate scientists are pointing to recent research that suggests sea ice cover is a likely culprit.
Recent imaging from the U.S. National Snow and Ice Data Center showed a historic minimum in Arctic ice cover last fall, and current data reveals that sea ice cover—which recently reached its maximum for the year—is at its sixth lowest extent in the satellite record. (Related: "Arctic Sea Ice Hits Record Low—Extreme Weather to Come?")
So Gizmo, I agree that those records show a general lack of agreement with
your strawman that there must be a totally uniform rise in temperature in
every corner of the globe, even for short timescales of 1 year.
Nice try, but the climate will never work in accordance with your strawman. You must admit, but as strawmen go, yours is extremely crude and simplistic.