Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Send Topic Print
Six aspects of denial (Read 4895 times)
BatteriesNotIncluded
Gold Member
*****
Offline


MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966
Re: Six aspects of denial
Reply #15 - Dec 16th, 2013 at 3:01pm
 
No vested interests to see here- MOVE ALONG PRETTY PLEASE

...
Back to top
 

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is.  It wouldn't be there without the tax payer.  Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know....  (swaggy) *
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 156094
Gender: male
Re: Six aspects of denial
Reply #16 - Dec 16th, 2013 at 3:04pm
 
# wrote on Dec 16th, 2013 at 12:27pm:
Innocent bystander wrote on Dec 16th, 2013 at 12:01pm:
You see the big problem we have with global warming is that there is no global warming, ...
The vast majority of the best qualified disagree with you, it seems.




Ah, consensus.

Roll Eyes


Back to top
 

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles
 
IP Logged
 
#
Gold Member
*****
Offline


A fool is certain: an
ignorant fool, absolutely
so

Posts: 2603
Re: Six aspects of denial
Reply #17 - Dec 16th, 2013 at 3:59pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 16th, 2013 at 3:04pm:
# wrote on Dec 16th, 2013 at 12:27pm:
Innocent bystander wrote on Dec 16th, 2013 at 12:01pm:
You see the big problem we have with global warming is that there is no global warming, ...
The vast majority of the best qualified disagree with you, it seems.




Ah, consensus.
Indeed.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
#
Gold Member
*****
Offline


A fool is certain: an
ignorant fool, absolutely
so

Posts: 2603
Re: Six aspects of denial
Reply #18 - Dec 16th, 2013 at 4:01pm
 
gizmo_2655 wrote on Dec 16th, 2013 at 12:38pm:
...
You attack the science, ...
No, I'm sceptical of the interpretations of the unqualified.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
#
Gold Member
*****
Offline


A fool is certain: an
ignorant fool, absolutely
so

Posts: 2603
Re: Six aspects of denial
Reply #19 - Dec 16th, 2013 at 4:02pm
 
Innocent bystander wrote on Dec 16th, 2013 at 12:48pm:
# wrote on Dec 16th, 2013 at 12:27pm:
Innocent bystander wrote on Dec 16th, 2013 at 12:01pm:
...
Damning isn't it?
I'm no better qualified to judge than you or Anthony Watts.



Can't you even read a graph? 
Do you know the difference between reading and interpretation?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
#
Gold Member
*****
Offline


A fool is certain: an
ignorant fool, absolutely
so

Posts: 2603
Re: Six aspects of denial
Reply #20 - Dec 16th, 2013 at 4:04pm
 
lee wrote on Dec 16th, 2013 at 1:48pm:
Doram, Zimmerman questionaire-

This was the full set of questions that Zimmerman asked in their survey:
...  
Not even a mention of CO2 either.
Relevance? Your qualifications for interpretation?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21603
Gender: male
Re: Six aspects of denial
Reply #21 - Dec 16th, 2013 at 5:25pm
 
AGW is supposedly caused by CO2. Shouldn't that have been a question or in a question somewhere?

Is 79 statistically significant out of a survey that returned 3,146 replies?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
#
Gold Member
*****
Offline


A fool is certain: an
ignorant fool, absolutely
so

Posts: 2603
Re: Six aspects of denial
Reply #22 - Dec 16th, 2013 at 5:40pm
 
lee wrote on Dec 16th, 2013 at 5:25pm:
AGW is supposedly caused by CO2. Shouldn't that have been a question or in a question somewhere?

Is 79 statistically significant out of a survey that returned 3,146 replies?

I presume you're question is about the majority? It's hard to tell sometimes, what you're on about.

The 'Quote' button is provided for good reason. Use it to quote what you're commenting on.

Anyway; it's Doran, not Doram. If your source got that wrong, what makes you believe the rest is accurate?

Over the years, there have been many such surveys. We've been down the rabbit hole with the papers published this year. I don't see any point in repeating the exercise. The outcome is unlikely to change.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21603
Gender: male
Re: Six aspects of denial
Reply #23 - Dec 16th, 2013 at 7:01pm
 
# wrote on Dec 16th, 2013 at 5:40pm:
Anyway; it's Doran, not Doram. If your source got that wrong, what makes you believe the rest is accurate?


Please forgive my typo. I am obviously not as perfect as you. Embarrassed
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
BatteriesNotIncluded
Gold Member
*****
Offline


MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966
Re: Six aspects of denial
Reply #24 - Dec 16th, 2013 at 7:10pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 16th, 2013 at 3:04pm:
# wrote on Dec 16th, 2013 at 12:27pm:
Innocent bystander wrote on Dec 16th, 2013 at 12:01pm:
You see the big problem we have with global warming is that there is no global warming, ...
The vast majority of the best qualified disagree with you, it seems.




Ah, consensus.

Roll Eyes



Ah, of fact or fiction?

VOLUME IS VANITY PROFIT IS SANITY!!!!!!!!!'
Back to top
 

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is.  It wouldn't be there without the tax payer.  Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know....  (swaggy) *
 
IP Logged
 
gizmo_2655
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male
Re: Six aspects of denial
Reply #25 - Dec 16th, 2013 at 8:35pm
 
# wrote on Dec 16th, 2013 at 4:01pm:
gizmo_2655 wrote on Dec 16th, 2013 at 12:38pm:
...
You attack the science, ...
No, I'm sceptical of the interpretations of the unqualified.


What interpretation??...He has simply used a list of temperatures provided by an official climate monitoring service.
The temperatures listed are not 'interpreted'
Back to top
 

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat
 
IP Logged
 
Innocent bystander
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 4220
Gender: male
Re: Six aspects of denial
Reply #26 - Dec 16th, 2013 at 9:06pm
 
77 out of 3164 scientists reckon that man made global warming is real, thats a consensus according to the warmies.  Grin

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
gizmo_2655
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male
Re: Six aspects of denial
Reply #27 - Dec 16th, 2013 at 10:11pm
 
Innocent bystander wrote on Dec 16th, 2013 at 9:06pm:
77 out of 3164 scientists reckon that man made global warming is real, thats a consensus according to the warmies.  Grin



Actually it's 77 out of 79. They removed everyone else of the 3164 because they didn't list climate science as their main area of expertise, and less than 50% of their published papers weren't about climate.


Oh and #, that's what Doran and Zimmerman actually say, in their OWN published conclusions.
Back to top
 

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat
 
IP Logged
 
Chimp_Logic
Gold Member
*****
Offline


πολιτικός

Posts: 4826
Mawson Base
Gender: male
Re: Six aspects of denial
Reply #28 - Dec 16th, 2013 at 11:34pm
 
7. Jesus loves you
Back to top
 

Mini Ice Age (2014-2029)
Dr Sircus cures cancer with Baking Soda and Magnesium - Jethro the MENTAL GIANT & his flute madness
 
IP Logged
 
gizmo_2655
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male
Re: Six aspects of denial
Reply #29 - Dec 17th, 2013 at 12:27am
 
Chimp_Logic wrote on Dec 16th, 2013 at 11:34pm:
7. Jesus loves you


No, he doesn't. He doesn't exist.
Back to top
 

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Send Topic Print