Australian Politics Forum

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21603 Gender:	Re: Uh oh Reply #30 - Dec 16^th, 2013 at 1:31pm No; it leads to "Why should we believe one over the other?"
Back to top	IP Logged

# Gold Member Offline A fool is certain: an ignorant fool, absolutely so Posts: 2603	Re: Uh oh Reply #31 - Dec 16^th, 2013 at 3:58pm lee wrote on Dec 16^th, 2013 at 1:31pm: No; it leads to "Why should we believe one over the other?" Which comes back to; what do the majority of the most credible say?
Back to top	IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded Gold Member Offline MediocrityNET: because people died for this! Posts: 26966	Re: Uh oh Reply #32 - Dec 16^th, 2013 at 4:36pm lee wrote on Dec 16^th, 2013 at 1:31pm: No; it leads to "Why should we believe one over the other?" Qualifications make the legitimate world go round! Are you seriously trying to argue they don't mr time-waster! (TIME WASTERS NEED NOT APPLY!)
Back to top	Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded Gold Member Offline MediocrityNET: because people died for this! Posts: 26966	Re: Uh oh Reply #33 - Dec 16^th, 2013 at 4:37pm Dear lee, is black really white?
Back to top	Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21603 Gender:	Re: Uh oh Reply #34 - Dec 16^th, 2013 at 5:27pm Is 79 statistically relevant?
Back to top	IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded Gold Member Offline MediocrityNET: because people died for this! Posts: 26966	Re: Uh oh Reply #35 - Dec 16^th, 2013 at 5:36pm lee wrote on Dec 16^th, 2013 at 10:21am: What is Watts an expert at? Definitely not Climastrology. Lol this is an internet id clearly on the backfoot!
Back to top	Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) IP Logged

# Gold Member Offline A fool is certain: an ignorant fool, absolutely so Posts: 2603	Re: Uh oh Reply #36 - Dec 16^th, 2013 at 5:46pm lee wrote on Dec 16^th, 2013 at 5:27pm: Is 79 statistically relevant? I don't have the faintest idea what you're on about. It would depend on context.
Back to top	IP Logged

#

Gold Member

Offline

A fool is certain: an
ignorant fool, absolutely
so

Posts: 2603

Re: Uh oh
Reply #37 - Dec 16^th, 2013 at 5:51pm

Rider wrote on Dec 16^th, 2013 at 1:06pm:

# wrote on Dec 16^th, 2013 at 12:16pm:

lee wrote on Dec 16^th, 2013 at 10:21am:

What is Watts an expert at?
...

As far as I can tell, he has no qualifications beyond high school. He studied electrical engineering and meteorology but, as far as anyone has been able to find out, didn't graduate. For a while, he worked as a weatherman; does that make him expert?

See:
Sourcewatch
Desmogblog and, for a bit of context;
Watching the Deniers.

... quoting warmist propaganda blogs is superior to quoting WUWT.....
...

lee asked a question, to which I gave an answer that includes links to further information. Whether lee accepts or rejects the information is up to him. If you have something constructive to contribute, feel free.

Back to top

IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21603 Gender:	Re: Uh oh Reply #38 - Dec 16^th, 2013 at 7:09pm Wow; doesn't seem like a scientist among them. Merely bloggers like Watts.
Back to top	IP Logged

# Gold Member Offline A fool is certain: an ignorant fool, absolutely so Posts: 2603	Re: Uh oh Reply #39 - Dec 16^th, 2013 at 7:25pm lee wrote on Dec 16^th, 2013 at 7:09pm: Wow; doesn't seem like a scientist among them. Merely bloggers like Watts. To what do you refer?
Back to top	IP Logged

muso Gold Member Offline Posts: 13151 Gladstone, Queensland Gender:	Re: Uh oh Reply #40 - Dec 16^th, 2013 at 7:32pm Innocent bystander wrote on Dec 16^th, 2013 at 8:34am: Good grief this just gets nuttier by the day Yes, you definitely contribute to that.
Back to top	1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded Gold Member Offline MediocrityNET: because people died for this! Posts: 26966	Re: Uh oh Reply #41 - Dec 16^th, 2013 at 7:36pm Go the copper internet to make all our kids cry 4eva and eva!
Back to top	Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) IP Logged

lee

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 21603
Gender: male

Re: Uh oh
Reply #42 - Dec 16^th, 2013 at 8:05pm

# wrote on Dec 16^th, 2013 at 5:51pm:

Rider wrote on Dec 16^th, 2013 at 1:06pm:

# wrote on Dec 16^th, 2013 at 12:16pm:

lee wrote on Dec 16^th, 2013 at 10:21am:

What is Watts an expert at?
...

As far as I can tell, he has no qualifications beyond high school. He studied electrical engineering and meteorology but, as far as anyone has been able to find out, didn't graduate. For a while, he worked as a weatherman; does that make him expert?

See:
Sourcewatch
Desmogblog and, for a bit of context;
Watching the Deniers.

... quoting warmist propaganda blogs is superior to quoting WUWT.....
...

lee asked a question, to which I gave an answer that includes links to further information. Whether lee accepts or rejects the information is up to him. If you have something constructive to contribute, feel free.

The blogs to which I was referred.

Back to top

IP Logged

Innocent bystander Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 4220 Gender:	Re: Uh oh Reply #43 - Dec 16^th, 2013 at 8:29pm lee wrote on Dec 16^th, 2013 at 7:09pm: Wow; doesn't seem like a scientist among them. Merely bloggers like Watts. Yes but they are global warming approved bloggers
Back to top	IP Logged

#

Gold Member

Offline

A fool is certain: an
ignorant fool, absolutely
so

Posts: 2603

Re: Uh oh
Reply #44 - Dec 17^th, 2013 at 7:10am

lee wrote on Dec 16^th, 2013 at 8:05pm:

# wrote on Dec 16^th, 2013 at 5:51pm:

Rider wrote on Dec 16^th, 2013 at 1:06pm:

# wrote on Dec 16^th, 2013 at 12:16pm:

lee wrote on Dec 16^th, 2013 at 10:21am:

What is Watts an expert at?
...

As far as I can tell, he has no qualifications beyond high school. He studied electrical engineering and meteorology but, as far as anyone has been able to find out, didn't graduate. For a while, he worked as a weatherman; does that make him expert?

See:
Sourcewatch
Desmogblog and, for a bit of context;
Watching the Deniers.

... quoting warmist propaganda blogs is superior to quoting WUWT.....
...

lee asked a question, to which I gave an answer that includes links to further information. Whether lee accepts or rejects the information is up to him. If you have something constructive to contribute, feel free.

The blogs to which I was referred.

I presume the answer above is to my question: # wrote on Dec 16^th, 2013 at 7:25pm:

lee wrote on Dec 16^th, 2013 at 7:09pm:

Wow; doesn't seem like a scientist among them. Merely bloggers like Watts.

To what do you refer?

You really are getting yourself tied in knots, aren't you?

Anyhow, your question was about Anthony Watts. Anthony Watts has no connection with science; quite the opposite, in fact. Your complaint is that I didn't refer you to scientists for information on Anthony Watts.

Would you like to clarify the logic behind your complaint? Undecided

Back to top

« Last Edit: Dec 17^th, 2013 at 7:18am by # »

IP Logged