namnugenot wrote on Jan 8^th, 2014 at 9:20pm:


I made a broad sweeping generalisation concerning the mental capacity and inherent level of deceitness of the typical AGW denialist priest freak fascist.

And lo and behold YOU emerge from the pit that you lurk within as the only defender of your religious faith and lunatic fundamentalist church group cult.

You know what that says don't you, you fallen stench ridden clown mule fascist freak

I think that I can speak for everyone who has used this forum over the past 6 years, and make a public announcement in relation to your forthcoming apology and compensation

namnugenot wrote on Jan 9^th, 2014 at 8:01am:


You certainly fail under the "ignorance" test.

How can you deny the co2 emissions contribute to global warming which has litterally mountains of research to confirm it over the past 20 years.

yet...

Happily believe so2 contributes to global cooling with next very little scientific research to back it up. And very little research to see what other effects it might have.

Seems contradictory. Is contradiction a lie, or just ignorance ?

lee wrote on Jan 9^th, 2014 at 10:53am:


You think?

You can do that can you?

Where are your sources?

You gallop in here on a daily basis peddling your denialist religion on behalf of your beloved fascist fossil fuel corporations and deranged right wing fascist ideologies and expect to be taken seriously.

Apologise to everyone in this forum.

Anyone that thinks changing co2 ppm levels from 3 or 4 or 5 will make a differece to anything is quite mad   

lee wrote on Jan 9^th, 2014 at 10:53am:


Probably best you dont try thinking to much.

And if you do, keep the results to yourself.

Innocent bystander wrote on Jan 9^th, 2014 at 2:04pm:



..what if the atmospheric CO2 concentration increased from say 286 ppmv to say 400 ppmv??

Humans have burnt less than 3% of the total fossil fuel reserves in the earths crust over the industrial period.

What do you think will happen to the earths interconnected biological and non-biological systems if the CO2 level is ramped from its current level of 400 ppmv to say 1000 ppmv? (ie 0.1%)

What proportion of the total fossil fuel reserves need to be burnt to breach the 1000 ppmv CO2 level?

What will be the average global temperature if the earths atmospheric CO2 level reaches 1000 ppmv?

What are the consequences to the earths climate and ecosystems if the CO2 level breaches the 1000 ppmv level?

I assume that you have either personally estimated answers to these questions or at least have conducted research and/or sieved through the PEER REVIEWED scientific literature to obtain answers.

Its just that you come across in this particular thread as someone with a VERY BIG mouth and with associated putrid breath stench, but don't provide any answers or enlightenment.


cheers

'Microscopic fungi that live in plants' roots play a major role in the storage and release of carbon from the soil into the atmosphere, according to a University of Texas at Austin researcher and his colleagues at Boston University and the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute. The role of these fungi is currently unaccounted for in global climate models.

Some types of symbiotic fungi can lead to 70 percent more carbon stored in the soil.'

http://www.utexas.edu/news/2014/01/08/symbiotic-fungi-impact-carbon/

So one more thing the models don't model.