Chimp_Logic wrote on Nov 22
nd, 2013 at 8:39pm:
# wrote on Nov 22
nd, 2013 at 7:17pm:
Chimp_Logic wrote on Nov 22
nd, 2013 at 6:06pm:
# wrote on Nov 22
nd, 2013 at 2:43pm:
Chimp_Logic wrote on Nov 22
nd, 2013 at 9:46am:
...
I am here to learn from the best.
...
No Chimp, right now, you're here to troll.
Consider this a warning.
First you refuse to respond to questions, then you vanish, then all of a sudden you are issuing threats of banishments
who are you really?
If you have something to say, then say it. If you have nothing to contribute, then say nothing.
This subject is a distraction from the topic.
... the very least you can do is provide an explanation as to why the glacial rate of sublimation ...
No, it isn't. You see, I don't claim to be a scientist. Any such attempt on my part would be dishonest.
You acknowledge, however, that glacial ice sublimes at atmospheric pressure. That, at least, is progress.
I merely pointed out what happens. You didn't deny it (and now acknowledge it), but affected to be nonplussed at not understanding it. To me, it's about as puzzling as laundry drying on a clothes line.
I you're really puzzled by the phenomenon, then you put yourself in the same league as lee; an amateur, failing to understand what they're not qualified to understand.
From my observation, you're not really puzzled at all. You're just saying what will get you attention. In other words, you're trolling.
It seems that muso judges otherwise. I'll bow to his superior experience.