24 Hours of Reality
The Climate Reality Project

October 22 & 23, 2013

Join us as we go around the world, identifying the costs of carbon pollution and the solution that can change the course of our future.

We are all paying for carbon pollution

Find out how you are paying, add your cost, then share with those who can help to end climate denial and put a price on carbon.

# wrote on Oct 21^st, 2013 at 8:14pm:



Thanks for the invite, really.

However, I might just have a life instead.

Cheers.

# wrote on Oct 21^st, 2013 at 8:14pm:


I say shove it where it fits pal.

There was never a need for carbon pricing.

Do you work for the Roma club too do you...LMFAO...!!

Humans aren't doing anything wrong by burning fossil fuels.

The Earth is fine, human CO2 emissions will not cause all the doom and gloom of you AGW bed wetters.

Ajax wrote on Oct 22^nd, 2013 at 4:52pm:


Did you refer to the scientific community to arrive at that eternal and global essessment?

What model did you use to predict the future?

Ajax wrote on Oct 26^th, 2013 at 4:25pm:

It's all a vast conspiracy, isn't it? Of course it is. 

# wrote on Oct 25^th, 2013 at 8:50am:


NO.......!!!!!

And what is the remedy, creating a $2 trillion dollar market on wall street, so we can be saved......!!!!

That's how urgent it is........??????...LMFAO......!!!!!!!

# wrote on Oct 29^th, 2013 at 2:58pm:


You mean like Michael Mann who conveniently forgot the medieval warm period and the mini ice age.

OR

The IPCC who's computer circulation models predicted unequivocally that we would have 0.2 degree celcius warming per decade.

But for the last 15 years we have only has 0.05 degree celcius warming per decade.

And the IPCC being flabbergast by these results made up all manner of excuses....like the missing heat is in the deep oceans.

Well the Argo system has operating since 2002 and it couldn't find any heat.

While all the disciples argued that the missing heat did go into the deep layers of the ocean.

And then bam in AR5 the IPCC said the missing heat is in the top layers of the ocean.

Leaving those disciples that didn't question the IPCC's science and just argued that they were right with egg on their faces about the missing heat in the deep oceans.

These are the experts that you listen too.

Who told us that there would be no glaciers left by 2035.

Or no ice in the arctic by 2013.

Or that there was a hot spot in the tropopause that satellites and radiosonde data have failed to verify in real world observations.


Or that sea levels are rising at an alarming rate.

# lucky for you folks that take the science on faith, you have the skeptics that scrutinise every word that comes out of the IPCC mouth.

Otherwise by now they would have had the faithful praying to gaia for salvation............!!!!!

Ajax wrote on Oct 30^th, 2013 at 9:31am:
Do you even know what a sceptic is?

In this forum, you've done nothing but deny all that's inconsistent with your world view. That isn't scepticism.

A true sceptic takes account of the quality of sources. Muso did a pretty good job of showing how it's done. The sources you favour are of extremely poor quality. I can only guess that you favour them because they support your world view.

Entertainers like Mockton and bloggers like Nova and Watts are denialists, not sceptics.

A true sceptic doubts himself, first and foremost. Among other things, that means acknowledging our limits. I long ago came to appreciate the complexity of climate science. I accept that I'll never develop a credible grasp of it and so must accept the best analyses.

You deny all that contradicts your beliefs. I accept the best sources. I reckon I'm the sceptic here.