Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 
Send Topic Print
Discussions on the question of personal conscienc (Read 11000 times)
Lionel Edriess
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1932
Gender: male
Re: Discussions on the question of personal conscienc
Reply #15 - Oct 15th, 2013 at 10:55pm
 
Annie Anthrax wrote on Oct 15th, 2013 at 9:20pm:
Good post, Lionel.

Quote:
More importantly, the very social construct that requires us to be neighbourly has dislocated us from our neighbours by it's own evolution


Can you explain a little more?


Surely.

The Australian society I grew up in as a child, that, for instance, of a small rural town, has changed dramatically in the last 40 years. Like the town, the country has been subject to such things as population shift, technological advances, job losses and adjustments.

Where once the sons and daughters of the farmers moved to the cities for education/employment, the industries that once absorbed those people have now closed down. Once hives of industry, our cities have become collectives of generational unemployed.

The migrants that were accepted into Australian society after the ravages of the World Wars were willingly accepted because there were vacancies to fill and they brought a work-ethic that was rewarded. They became assimilated into a needy society.

As cities grew, as cities and country towns became places where there were more strangers in the streets, where there were more crimes of opportunity, where people became more distanced from their immediate neighbours - a more callous attitude began to develop. A feeling of disconnection and anonymity.

Sociologists will tell you that power struggles exist between members of clans, that power struggles exist between,and amongst, tribes - but cities will always war internally. But it is Government that runs countries and enslaves its own citizens.

It is also Government that promotes the Utopian ideal of Multiculturalism.

The calls for a global peace have yet to silence the amygdala.

As individuals, all we can do is be polite to each other.


Quote:
I disagree. It depends, perhaps, on an individual's idea of success.


True.

Money, power, sex or love.

Give me a little of each every day, with a beer or two, and I'd be happier than the proverbial pig.

But .........
Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 15th, 2013 at 11:01pm by Lionel Edriess »  

Toughen up, Australia!
 
IP Logged
 
Lionel Edriess
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1932
Gender: male
Re: Discussions on the question of personal conscienc
Reply #16 - Oct 15th, 2013 at 11:29pm
 
Yadda wrote on Oct 15th, 2013 at 10:14pm:
Lionel,

I am not having a go at you, but just as a hypothetical scenario;

Suppose, that you were a public figure in Australia, and that YOU had the authority and the power, to stop the export of live sheep, from Australian shores.

And then
you became aware of how live sheep, transported to places like the Gulf states and Pakistan and Egypt have been in the past, and are likely to continue to be treated in the future, on arrival in those places.

Now there is a lot of responsibility resting upon your shoulders.

The question which i would pose to you is this;


As a person of conscience, and as a person, in the public eye, who actually has the authority to stop the export of live sheep, from Australian shores, what would you do ?

Would you use your lawful authority to stop the export of live sheep, from Australia, to such places ?

And why [i.e. how would you publicly account for, or justify, your decision. ...assuming that you did.] ?



Good question.

I have no problem with cutting a sheep's throat. I've done it myself to provide meat for the table. That having been said, I wouldn't lead animal after animal into the same room for the same purpose.

There are already existing laws governing the live sheep trade and I'm of the opinion that not all these laws are currently being complied with. Of particular concern is the illegal trade in Australian live export sheep into illicit markets in order to satisfy localised demands for sacrificial offerings in upcoming religious observances.

Despite the revenue gained locally from such trade, I could be convinced that suspension of trade would be in the best interests of this country, particularly if endorsed by the relevant reputable bodies. Illegal trading in this, as in any other trading commodity, should be harshly dealt with. If such conditions could not be met, then perhaps a complete suspension would be enacted until such conditions were met.

I do not endorse unnecessary cruelty to animals, not even humans.

As an omnivore, ever mindful of the wishes and desires of the carnivores, I nevertheless ask for the considerate treatment of herbivores in their designated roles.
Back to top
 

Toughen up, Australia!
 
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 22392
A cat with a view
Re: Discussions on the question of personal conscienc
Reply #17 - Oct 16th, 2013 at 7:18am
 
Lionel Edriess wrote on Oct 15th, 2013 at 11:29pm:

I have no problem with cutting a sheep's throat. I've done it myself to provide meat for the table. That having been said, I wouldn't lead animal after animal into the same room for the same purpose.

There are already existing laws governing the live sheep trade and I'm of the opinion that not all these laws are currently being complied with. Of particular concern is the illegal trade in Australian live export sheep into illicit markets in order to satisfy localised demands for sacrificial offerings in upcoming religious observances.

Despite the revenue gained locally from such trade, I could be convinced that suspension of trade would be in the best interests of this country, particularly if endorsed by the relevant reputable bodies. Illegal trading in this, as in any other trading commodity, should be harshly dealt with. If such conditions could not be met, then perhaps a complete suspension would be enacted until such conditions were met.

I do not endorse unnecessary cruelty to animals, not even humans.

As an omnivore, ever mindful of the wishes and desires of the carnivores, I nevertheless ask for the considerate treatment of herbivores in their designated roles.





Lionel,

Thank you for your considered reply.

Again, i was not having a go at you.

I just wanted to highlight the the influence of 'social imperatives', which we all face, and, which act upon us all.


+++

'It is a matter of conscience.'

A social imperative which we all face in society [in this modern world], is that where we can choose to either make money, OR, we can choose do what is ethical, the widely accepted social imperative [i.e. 'ethical' choice] is that it is always socially acceptable, to choose to make money [...as the 1st imperative].

Another social imperative which we are all confronted with in society [in this modern world], is that the accepted social imperative [i.e. 'ethical' choice], is that we should remain silent, when, to say [to expose] publicly what is true, may be judged to be socially offensive [i.e. 'politically incorrect'] to someone, or, to some group of people.




And i am no saint.

We all face ethical [moral] choices in this modern world, but we all often fail to make a 'good' [the 'best'] choice.

Often we fail to make a 'good' choice because, imo, invariably, instead of making the choice which will cause 'least harm', we will choose to do, what will bring us [personally!] worldly pleasure [i.e. money, sex, social position, physical pleasure, etc].

[And some people object to their conscience even being reminded of that circumstance.]





p.s.
My diet is 70%-90% vegan [i eat fish occasionally].
And i understand that 'needs must' for omnivores, so i do not object to meat eaters using a knife to slaughter the food [the animal] that they will eat.







...
The intellectual moral high ground, of modern, sophisticated man.



Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
Postmodern Trendoid
Gold Member
*****
Offline


International socialist

Posts: 892
Gender: male
Re: Discussions on the question of personal conscienc
Reply #18 - Oct 16th, 2013 at 11:31am
 
Lionel Edriess wrote on Oct 15th, 2013 at 9:14pm:
I would like to think that we, as individuals, have developed enough personal character to differentiate between what we consider 'conscience' and learned rules/acceptances of personal behaviour.



So the part of us that isn't learned behaviour is a biological inheritance?
Back to top
 

Only the boat people can save us from our own evil.
 
IP Logged
 
Postmodern Trendoid
Gold Member
*****
Offline


International socialist

Posts: 892
Gender: male
Re: Discussions on the question of personal conscienc
Reply #19 - Oct 16th, 2013 at 11:32am
 
Annie Anthrax wrote on Oct 15th, 2013 at 8:52pm:
Postmodern Trendoid wrote on Oct 15th, 2013 at 5:36pm:
Is our personal conscience really personal, or just forgotten internalised social mores?



Overwhelmingly the latter - at least for small matters of conscience. That's my problem with the idea of sin and religious morals. They arouse unnecessary feelings of guilt and shame.


Okay. Do you think that there's some other influence than introjected social mores?
Back to top
 

Only the boat people can save us from our own evil.
 
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 22392
A cat with a view
Re: Discussions on the question of personal conscienc
Reply #20 - Oct 16th, 2013 at 9:45pm
 
Annie Anthrax wrote on Oct 15th, 2013 at 8:52pm:
Postmodern Trendoid wrote on Oct 15th, 2013 at 5:36pm:
Is our personal conscience really personal, or just forgotten internalised social mores?



Overwhelmingly the latter - at least for small matters of conscience.

That's my problem with the idea of sin and religious morals.

They arouse unnecessary feelings of guilt and shame.







Postmodern Trendoid wrote on Oct 16th, 2013 at 11:32am:
Okay. Do you think that there's some other influence than introjected social mores?





Postmodern Trendoid,

When you say; "other influences", are you referring to the 'unnecessary feelings of guilt and shame', mentioned by Annie ?




And Annie,

If we actually do something wrong, is it then subsequently 'unnatural', for us to then have [to 'own'] 'feelings of guilt and shame' [if we have made a poor choice] ?

And if you believe that [stance], can you justify that stance ?

i.e.
Why shouldn't you be held to account, every time, that you make a poor choice ?



Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 22392
A cat with a view
Re: Discussions on the question of personal conscienc
Reply #21 - Oct 16th, 2013 at 10:00pm
 
Yadda wrote on Oct 16th, 2013 at 9:45pm:
Annie Anthrax wrote on Oct 15th, 2013 at 8:52pm:
Postmodern Trendoid wrote on Oct 15th, 2013 at 5:36pm:
Is our personal conscience really personal, or just forgotten internalised social mores?



Overwhelmingly the latter - at least for small matters of conscience.

That's my problem with the idea of sin and religious morals.

They arouse unnecessary feelings of guilt and shame.







Postmodern Trendoid wrote on Oct 16th, 2013 at 11:32am:
Okay. Do you think that there's some other influence than introjected social mores?





Postmodern Trendoid,

When you say; "other influences", are you referring to the 'unnecessary feelings of guilt and shame', mentioned by Annie ?




And Annie,

If we actually do something wrong, is it then subsequently 'unnatural', for us to then have [to 'own'] 'feelings of guilt and shame' [if we have made a poor choice] ?

And if you believe that [stance], can you justify that stance ?

i.e.
Why shouldn't you be held to account, every time, that you make a poor choice ?




I'd like to play chess with you Annie, coz you would concede, the moment that you recognised that you had previously made some 'bad' moves.

That is correct, isn't it ?

That you are just a 'runner', 'away from' ?

[you can bite my head off,     tis OK.]

Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
Winston Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Ministry of Truth

Posts: 1549
Oceania
Gender: male
Re: Discussions on the question of personal conscienc
Reply #22 - Oct 16th, 2013 at 11:13pm
 
I'd be interested in seeing data on some of the more extreme cases of experimentation on human capabilities. This is why we need proper freedom of information, so people can make informed choices based on the facts. We are basically programmable puppets, who can be manipulated into accepting almost any kind of existence.
Back to top
 

Big Brother is watching you
 
IP Logged
 
Postmodern Trendoid
Gold Member
*****
Offline


International socialist

Posts: 892
Gender: male
Re: Discussions on the question of personal conscienc
Reply #23 - Oct 17th, 2013 at 8:43am
 
Yadda wrote on Oct 16th, 2013 at 9:45pm:
Annie Anthrax wrote on Oct 15th, 2013 at 8:52pm:
Postmodern Trendoid wrote on Oct 15th, 2013 at 5:36pm:
Is our personal conscience really personal, or just forgotten internalised social mores?



Overwhelmingly the latter - at least for small matters of conscience.

That's my problem with the idea of sin and religious morals.

They arouse unnecessary feelings of guilt and shame.







Postmodern Trendoid wrote on Oct 16th, 2013 at 11:32am:
Okay. Do you think that there's some other influence than introjected social mores?





Postmodern Trendoid,

When you say; "other influences", are you referring to the 'unnecessary feelings of guilt and shame', mentioned by Annie ?


No. I am thinking of biological inheritance.

Personal conscience = introjected social mores + biological inheritance.
Back to top
 

Only the boat people can save us from our own evil.
 
IP Logged
 
Annie Anthrax
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 7062
Gender: female
Re: Discussions on the question of personal conscienc
Reply #24 - Oct 17th, 2013 at 3:33pm
 
Postmodern Trendoid wrote on Oct 16th, 2013 at 11:31am:
Lionel Edriess wrote on Oct 15th, 2013 at 9:14pm:
I would like to think that we, as individuals, have developed enough personal character to differentiate between what we consider 'conscience' and learned rules/acceptances of personal behaviour.



So the part of us that isn't learned behaviour is a biological inheritance?



Biological inheritance of the learned behaviour of our ancestors, perhaps, through the process of evolution.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Annie Anthrax
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 7062
Gender: female
Re: Discussions on the question of personal conscienc
Reply #25 - Oct 17th, 2013 at 3:42pm
 
Yadda wrote on Oct 16th, 2013 at 10:00pm:
Yadda wrote on Oct 16th, 2013 at 9:45pm:
Annie Anthrax wrote on Oct 15th, 2013 at 8:52pm:
Postmodern Trendoid wrote on Oct 15th, 2013 at 5:36pm:
Is our personal conscience really personal, or just forgotten internalised social mores?



Overwhelmingly the latter - at least for small matters of conscience.

That's my problem with the idea of sin and religious morals.

They arouse unnecessary feelings of guilt and shame.







Postmodern Trendoid wrote on Oct 16th, 2013 at 11:32am:
Okay. Do you think that there's some other influence than introjected social mores?





Postmodern Trendoid,

When you say; "other influences", are you referring to the 'unnecessary feelings of guilt and shame', mentioned by Annie ?




And Annie,

If we actually do something wrong, is it then subsequently 'unnatural', for us to then have [to 'own'] 'feelings of guilt and shame' [if we have made a poor choice] ?

And if you believe that [stance], can you justify that stance ?

i.e.
Why shouldn't you be held to account, every time, that you make a poor choice ?




I'd like to play chess with you Annie, coz you would concede, the moment that you recognised that you had previously made some 'bad' moves.

That is correct, isn't it ?

That you are just a 'runner', 'away from' ?

[you can bite my head off,     tis OK.]




I'm more of a Scrabble girl and I don't lose when I play. I'm a hopeless strategist, though, so chess isn't my forte. My boyfriend tried to teach me, but it was all in vain, I'm afraid - I can never think further than my next move.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Winston Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Ministry of Truth

Posts: 1549
Oceania
Gender: male
Re: Discussions on the question of personal conscienc
Reply #26 - Oct 17th, 2013 at 8:18pm
 
Yadda wrote on Oct 16th, 2013 at 10:00pm:
Yadda wrote on Oct 16th, 2013 at 9:45pm:
Annie Anthrax wrote on Oct 15th, 2013 at 8:52pm:
Postmodern Trendoid wrote on Oct 15th, 2013 at 5:36pm:
Is our personal conscience really personal, or just forgotten internalised social mores?



Overwhelmingly the latter - at least for small matters of conscience.

That's my problem with the idea of sin and religious morals.

They arouse unnecessary feelings of guilt and shame.







Postmodern Trendoid wrote on Oct 16th, 2013 at 11:32am:
Okay. Do you think that there's some other influence than introjected social mores?





Postmodern Trendoid,

When you say; "other influences", are you referring to the 'unnecessary feelings of guilt and shame', mentioned by Annie ?




And Annie,

If we actually do something wrong, is it then subsequently 'unnatural', for us to then have [to 'own'] 'feelings of guilt and shame' [if we have made a poor choice] ?

And if you believe that [stance], can you justify that stance ?

i.e.
Why shouldn't you be held to account, every time, that you make a poor choice ?




I'd like to play chess with you Annie, coz you would concede, the moment that you recognised that you had previously made some 'bad' moves.

That is correct, isn't it ?

That you are just a 'runner', 'away from' ?

[you can bite my head off,     tis OK.]



Reinforce success, abandon failure. Military strategy 101.
Back to top
 

Big Brother is watching you
 
IP Logged
 
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: Discussions on the question of personal conscienc
Reply #27 - Oct 17th, 2013 at 8:23pm
 
Postmodern Trendoid wrote on Oct 15th, 2013 at 5:36pm:
Is our personal conscience really personal, or just forgotten internalised social mores?



Ie - are we free or not?

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: Discussions on the question of personal conscienc
Reply #28 - Oct 17th, 2013 at 8:34pm
 
Annie Anthrax wrote on Oct 17th, 2013 at 3:33pm:
Postmodern Trendoid wrote on Oct 16th, 2013 at 11:31am:
Lionel Edriess wrote on Oct 15th, 2013 at 9:14pm:
I would like to think that we, as individuals, have developed enough personal character to differentiate between what we consider 'conscience' and learned rules/acceptances of personal behaviour.



So the part of us that isn't learned behaviour is a biological inheritance?



Biological inheritance of the learned behaviour of our ancestors, perhaps, through the process of evolution.



Are you saying this or is this really your ancestor speaking through evolution?


I think evolution is hugely overestimated and overstated when it comes to our actual, personal lives (the only one we actually know and inhabit consciously). Nobody lives their personal lives along evolutionary lines, except total psycho- and sociopaths.

Religion, with all its pitfalls, is much more on a human scale, like a Renaissance Italian piazza, than evolution and all its grand boulevards ofimpersonal, concrete brutalism.
We cannot lead evolutionary lives.


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Winston Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Ministry of Truth

Posts: 1549
Oceania
Gender: male
Re: Discussions on the question of personal conscienc
Reply #29 - Oct 17th, 2013 at 8:47pm
 
Soren wrote on Oct 17th, 2013 at 8:34pm:
Annie Anthrax wrote on Oct 17th, 2013 at 3:33pm:
Postmodern Trendoid wrote on Oct 16th, 2013 at 11:31am:
Lionel Edriess wrote on Oct 15th, 2013 at 9:14pm:
I would like to think that we, as individuals, have developed enough personal character to differentiate between what we consider 'conscience' and learned rules/acceptances of personal behaviour.



So the part of us that isn't learned behaviour is a biological inheritance?



Biological inheritance of the learned behaviour of our ancestors, perhaps, through the process of evolution.



Are you saying this or is this really your ancestor speaking through evolution?


I think evolution is hugely overestimated and overstated when it comes to our actual, personal lives (the only one we actually know and inhabit consciously). Nobody lives their personal lives along evolutionary lines, except total psycho- and sociopaths.

Religion, with all its pitfalls, is much more on a human scale, like a Renaissance Italian piazza, than evolution and all its grand boulevards ofimpersonal, concrete brutalism.
We cannot lead evolutionary lives.




I think that just about sums of the general mindset of the cheerleading squad of the political right.

Social Darwinist, pseudo-scientific, apologistic smokescreens for ignorance, bullying and greed.
Back to top
 

Big Brother is watching you
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 
Send Topic Print