Australian Politics Forum - spineless apologetics

Soren

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 25654
Gender: male

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #135 - Sep 29^th, 2013 at 9:42pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 28^th, 2013 at 11:56pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Sep 28^th, 2013 at 11:52pm:

http://i279.photobucket.com/albums/kk157/dyedinthewool/Smilies/bth_Yawn.gif

You are so predictable, Soren. Repetition does not improve your views or your lack of argument. Roll Eyes

Sometimes I wonder why he even bothers at all.

As soon as you show a flaw in his "argument", he says "but you're a stupid poo head".

Don't be so cocky, dickheaddle. You couldn't show a flaw in any of my arguments even if your live depended on it. You simply assert sh!t and call it an argument. You are too simple to actually have a reasoned position.

Look at your avatar, look at your posts, look at your use of language. You are just a moron with no coherent thoughts. You are here because you are not tolerated anywhere else. You have never made a succinct or compelling argument in your life.

You complain. That's what you live off. You complain and you bellyache. And you mistake that for a cohesive argument or a well-formed philosophy of life.

You bitch and you think that's all the justification you ever need.

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 142330
Gender: male

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #136 - Sep 29^th, 2013 at 9:44pm

Soren wrote on Sep 29^th, 2013 at 9:42pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 28^th, 2013 at 11:56pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Sep 28^th, 2013 at 11:52pm:

http://i279.photobucket.com/albums/kk157/dyedinthewool/Smilies/bth_Yawn.gif

You are so predictable, Soren. Repetition does not improve your views or your lack of argument. Roll Eyes

Sometimes I wonder why he even bothers at all.

As soon as you show a flaw in his "argument", he says "but you're a stupid poo head".

Don't be so cocky, dickheaddle.

Thanks for the advice.

I choose to ignore it though.

You understand, of course?

Back to top

IP Logged

Brian Ross Gold Member Offline Representative of me Posts: 43614	Re: spineless apologetics Reply #137 - Sep 29^th, 2013 at 9:57pm Just so predictable, Soren.
Back to top	It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using memes. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk... IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 142330 Gender:	Re: spineless apologetics Reply #138 - Sep 29^th, 2013 at 10:00pm Brian Ross wrote on Sep 29^th, 2013 at 9:57pm: http://i279.photobucket.com/albums/kk157/dyedinthewool/Smilies/bth_Yawn.gif Just so predictable, Soren. Come on, at least we have a resident troll we can call our own.
Back to top	IP Logged

Brian Ross Gold Member Offline Representative of me Posts: 43614	Re: spineless apologetics Reply #139 - Sep 29^th, 2013 at 11:14pm Should he be under a bridge, terrorising some goats or something?
Back to top	It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using memes. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk... IP Logged

Karnal Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 97788	Re: spineless apologetics Reply #140 - Sep 30^th, 2013 at 10:51am My friends, we are all one. We cannot criticize our brothers here. They come from other countries. They have a different way of making the cheese, isn't it.
Back to top	IP Logged

Brian Ross Gold Member Offline Representative of me Posts: 43614	Re: spineless apologetics Reply #141 - Oct 1^st, 2013 at 3:59pm I am quite willing to allow them to make any cheese they desire, in any way, as long as it's legal. Why can't they extend that courtesy to myself or others though? Why must we all make our cheeses their way and only their way?
Back to top	It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using memes. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk... IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 97788

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #142 - Oct 1^st, 2013 at 4:14pm

Brian Ross wrote on Oct 1^st, 2013 at 3:59pm:

I am quite willing to allow them to make any cheese they desire, in any way, as long as it's legal.

Why can't they extend that courtesy to myself or others though? Why must we all make our cheeses their way and only their way? Roll Eyes

Ah, this is a good question. Old boy will tell you his way is the best.

Mother knows best, isn't it. She makes lovey stool for all.

Taste is not a matter of taste, you know.

Back to top

IP Logged

freediver

Gold Member

Offline

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49963
At my desk.

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #143 - Oct 2^nd, 2013 at 4:42pm

Brian Ross wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2013 at 1:46pm:

freediver wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2013 at 10:18am:

Brian did give us a very brief window into what he actually thinks:

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1379233325

You may not be very comfortable with it, but it is the beginning of an argument.

Only with those that deliberately refuse to accept the context in which the statement was made.

So, FD, you apologised yet for finding a single Muslim who disagree with your view of me or are you still squirming? Roll Eyes

In what sense have I refused to accept the context? Are you suggesting there is something about the context that means it is no longer spineless apologetics? If so you will have to explain it for us.

You are yet to find a single Muslim (or even a human) who does not consider it spineless apologetics. That is what I suggested you cannot do, and so far you have been incapable. You are usually keen to admit what you are incapable of.

Back to top

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.

IP Logged

Brian Ross Gold Member Offline Representative of me Posts: 43614	Re: spineless apologetics Reply #144 - Oct 2^nd, 2013 at 11:10pm The only one who is spineless here is FD. He asked a question, got a reply which invalided his assertion and yet he still refuses to apologise. Typical bigoted behavior. Oh, and the context? Go back to the original post, FD and reread it. It was in reply to a specific question.
Back to top	It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using memes. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk... IP Logged

Datalife Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 2405 Gender:	Re: spineless apologetics Reply #145 - Oct 2^nd, 2013 at 11:47pm Wrong thread.
Back to top	"If they’re out there in the high seas, what you would do is seek to turn them back through the agency of the Australian Navy". Kevin Rudd on 2GB, July 12, 2007 IP Logged

freediver Gold Member Offline www.ozpolitic.com Posts: 49963 At my desk.	Re: spineless apologetics Reply #146 - Oct 3^rd, 2013 at 7:53am You mean when Gandalf agreed that what you posted is spineless? Can you explain how being in response to a specific question makes it less spineless? Does spinelessness become bravery as the context narrows? How do you decide when to say something that spineless and when to say something a bit more human?
Back to top	People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words. IP Logged

polite_gandalf Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 20027 Canberra Gender:	Re: spineless apologetics Reply #147 - Oct 3^rd, 2013 at 10:38am freediver wrote on Oct 3^rd, 2013 at 7:53am: You mean when Gandalf agreed that what you posted is spineless? I did not. You might not like my reasoning, but I made it clear I didn't consider it "spineless". I take great issue with you misrepresenting my views so blatantly.
Back to top	A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said: Quote: Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms. IP Logged

freediver

Gold Member

Offline

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49963
At my desk.

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #148 - Oct 4^th, 2013 at 9:56am

This is the closest you could get to disagreeing with me about what Brian said:

polite_gandalf wrote on Sep 25^th, 2013 at 8:22am:

freediver wrote on Sep 24^th, 2013 at 8:41am:

This is what I expected you to consider spineless:

On the surface, yes.

That you can imagine an alternative meaning does not really change that fact that what Brian actually said is spineless by anyone's definition, even yours. When you comment on what he said and ignore who said it or why you think he might have said it then you have no choice but to admit this.

Even Brian is doing his best to pretend he never said it.

Back to top

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.

IP Logged

polite_gandalf

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #149 - Oct 4^th, 2013 at 11:15am

Yes thats right FD, I interpreted what Brian said in a different way to you. That is the very definition of disagreeing with you. Is that a little too hard for you to understand?

I gave my reasoning about why I interpreted it in that way, I don't need to go over it again. I object to you putting words in my mouth, especially when you accuse me and others of doing the same to you ad-infinitum. "On the surface" does not mean "yes I agree with you" - it means there's much more to it than that. But I'm not here to justify what Brian said, I'm merely pointing out the arrogance and stupidity you have displayed in blatantly fabricating my words for this pathetic face-saving exercise of yours.

bugger me what childish antics Roll Eyes

Don't you feel just a little shame in pursuing such pathetic, childish crusades of yours?

Back to top

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:

Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.

IP Logged