Australian Politics Forum - spineless apologetics

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 43614

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #120 - Sep 27^th, 2013 at 6:20pm

freediver wrote on Sep 27^th, 2013 at 12:23pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Sep 26^th, 2013 at 10:46pm:

freediver wrote on Sep 26^th, 2013 at 9:29pm:

Gandalf agrees with me about what you posted Brian.

BTW, do you agree with Gandalf that you really meant something completely different to what you actually said?

I meant what I said in the context it was said, FD.

Gandalf got it basically right. Your prejudices I suspect prevent you from understanding it.

So you meant exactly what you said, yet Gandalf is also right in insisting you meant something completely different because what you posted is spineless if taken at face value?

Can you tell the difference between what you posted and Gandalf's interpretation of what you 'really' meant?

I see Gandalf's interpretation and accept it as an alternative, valid one, FD.

Now, will you admit you were wrong? One Muslims spoke up, you claimed none would. Therefore you were wrong, now weren't you? Someone who wasn't spineless would admit he was wrong. You keep squirming and trying to introduce red herrings. Time you ponied up, FD. Roll Eyes

Back to top

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using memes. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

freediver Gold Member Offline www.ozpolitic.com Posts: 49963 At my desk.	Re: spineless apologetics Reply #121 - Sep 27^th, 2013 at 10:04pm Quote: One Muslims spoke up, you claimed none would. I claimed that they all think your post is spineless. Gandalf thinks it is. Perhaps you should try another Muslim. How about I broaden it for you? I challenge you to find one human being who does not think your post is spineless.
Back to top	People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words. IP Logged

Brian Ross Gold Member Offline Representative of me Posts: 43614	Re: spineless apologetics Reply #122 - Sep 27^th, 2013 at 10:55pm Moving the goalposts, FD? How disappointing...
Back to top	It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using memes. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk... IP Logged

freediver Gold Member Offline www.ozpolitic.com Posts: 49963 At my desk.	Re: spineless apologetics Reply #123 - Sep 28^th, 2013 at 8:00am I'm trying to make it easier for you. If you would prefer to find a Muslim who does not think what you posted is spineless, go for it.
Back to top	People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words. IP Logged

Soren Gold Member Offline Posts: 25654 Gender:	Re: spineless apologetics Reply #124 - Sep 28^th, 2013 at 9:09am http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1379233323/1#1
Back to top	IP Logged

Brian Ross Gold Member Offline Representative of me Posts: 43614	Re: spineless apologetics Reply #125 - Sep 28^th, 2013 at 11:53am And so we return to the start of the thread, after a great deal of personal attacks. Lets see if you can get the context in which that statement was made, this time, Soren?
Back to top	It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using memes. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk... IP Logged

Soren Gold Member Offline Posts: 25654 Gender:	Re: spineless apologetics Reply #126 - Sep 28^th, 2013 at 9:53pm Soooo... how exactly are you not a spineless apologist, then?
Back to top	IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 43614

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #127 - Sep 28^th, 2013 at 10:02pm

1. If I was "spineless" I wouldn't be debating with you, Soren.
2. If I was "spineless" I would resile from what I have said. I do not.
3. If I was an "apologetic" I would excuse all Muslim's their crimes. I do not.

Of course, these facts will not suit your continued attack on me so you'll ignore them, now won't you? Roll Eyes

Now, run along and engage in a bit more ad hominem attack. It amuses me no end seeing you flailing around. Grin

Now if you really want to see someone who's spineless, look to your compatriot, FD. Grin

Back to top

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using memes. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

Soren

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 25654
Gender: male

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #128 - Sep 28^th, 2013 at 10:14pm

This is what you actually said:

Quote:

I make no excuses for those nations and their laws, BV. I merely recognise that it is their right to create and unfortunately impose those punishments. It is terrible but I also recognise I have no right or ability to criticise them. I am neither a member of their religion or a citizen of any of those nations.

This is spineless, stupid, mincing idiocy. Your words, your stance. This is you. If you have no right to criticise them, you have no right to criticise ANYONE or ANYTHING. Yet here you are, every day, preening about your smacking indignations, critical of all but the most intolerant ideology going.

For someone who says he has no right to judge, you are one smacking indignant critical yapping little puppy, Brain. And so we look at you and see you for the two-faced, inconsistent, strutting little pr!ck you are. Which is NO CRITICISM AT ALL, naturally, since I am not you.i

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 142330 Gender:	Re: spineless apologetics Reply #129 - Sep 28^th, 2013 at 10:21pm Soren wrote on Sep 28^th, 2013 at 10:14pm: This is spineless, stupid, mincing idiocy. And rest assured fellow forum members, there is no greater authority on stupid, mincing idiocy that Soren. Anyone care to object?
Back to top	IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 142330 Gender:	Re: spineless apologetics Reply #130 - Sep 28^th, 2013 at 10:56pm greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 28^th, 2013 at 10:21pm: Soren wrote on Sep 28^th, 2013 at 10:14pm: This is spineless, stupid, mincing idiocy. And rest assured fellow forum members, there is no greater authority on stupid, mincing idiocy that Soren. Anyone care to object? No? Case closed then.
Back to top	IP Logged

Soren

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 25654
Gender: male

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #131 - Sep 28^th, 2013 at 11:36pm

Brian Ross wrote on Sep 28^th, 2013 at 10:02pm:

1. If I was "spineless" I wouldn't be debating with you, Soren.
2. If I was "spineless" I would resile from what I have said. I do not.
3. If I was an "apologetic" I would excuse all Muslim's their crimes. I do not.

Of course, these facts will not suit your continued attack on me so you'll ignore them, now won't you? Roll Eyes

Now, run along and engage in a bit more ad hominem attack. It amuses me no end seeing you flailing around. Grin

Now if you really want to see someone who's spineless, look to your compatriot, FD. Grin

1. If I was "spineless" I wouldn't be debating with you, Soren.

You are not debating. You are obfuscating.

2. If I was "spineless" I would resile from what I have said. I do not.

You do not resile from a spineless stance. You remain spineless.

3. If I was an "apologetic" I would excuse all Muslim's their crimes. I do not.

If so, you only condemn Muslim crimes that are never mentioned on these boards. All the ones that are mentioned here, you excuse.

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 142330
Gender: male

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #132 - Sep 28^th, 2013 at 11:40pm

Soren wrote on Sep 28^th, 2013 at 11:36pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Sep 28^th, 2013 at 10:02pm:

1. If I was "spineless" I wouldn't be debating with you, Soren.
2. If I was "spineless" I would resile from what I have said. I do not.
3. If I was an "apologetic" I would excuse all Muslim's their crimes. I do not.

Of course, these facts will not suit your continued attack on me so you'll ignore them, now won't you? Roll Eyes

Now, run along and engage in a bit more ad hominem attack. It amuses me no end seeing you flailing around. Grin

Now if you really want to see someone who's spineless, look to your compatriot, FD. Grin

1. If I was "spineless" I wouldn't be debating with you, Soren.

You are not debating. You are obfuscating.

2. If I was "spineless" I would resile from what I have said. I do not.

You do not resile from a spineless stance. You remain spineless.

3. If I was an "apologetic" I would excuse all Muslim's their crimes. I do not.

If so, you only condemn Muslim crimes that are never mentioned on these boards. All the ones that are mentioned here, you excuse.

Sorry Soren.

It was case closed, one post back.

Better luck next time.

(The next one will be gentle Soren, just trust him - and use lots of lube)

Back to top

IP Logged

Brian Ross Gold Member Offline Representative of me Posts: 43614	Re: spineless apologetics Reply #133 - Sep 28^th, 2013 at 11:52pm You are so predictable, Soren. Repetition does not improve your views or your lack of argument.
Back to top	It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using memes. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk... IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 142330
Gender: male

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #134 - Sep 28^th, 2013 at 11:56pm

Brian Ross wrote on Sep 28^th, 2013 at 11:52pm:

http://i279.photobucket.com/albums/kk157/dyedinthewool/Smilies/bth_Yawn.gif

You are so predictable, Soren. Repetition does not improve your views or your lack of argument. Roll Eyes

Sometimes I wonder why he even bothers at all.

As soon as you show a flaw in his "argument", he says "but you're a stupid poo head".

Tonight has certainly not been his night. There have been bigger fools on this forum, however, I can't think of any right now.

Get some sleep Soren.

Back to top

IP Logged