longweekend58 wrote on Sep 12
th, 2013 at 4:02pm:
...Just what is your hysterical opposition to a cost benefit analysis??? ...
I've
already given my reasons. Abbot in particular has shown
a propensity for corrupting those who do such tasks for him. My assessment of Turnbull is that he'll do what Abbott tells him. Any such analysis by this government would be calculated to deceive. What's your
onanistic attachment to what is, after all, no more than a political tactic in this context?
Do we need more studies? Wasn't the need realised shortly after the Internet became widely available? Remember Opel? Remember
Networking the Nation?
Until Kevin Rudd came up with fibre to the home, thus earning the ire of Rupert Murdoch, broadband had support from both sides of politics. It was only when the plan became something that would actually work, that opposition mounted.
I find it particularly amusing that
what the Coalition labelled "fraudband" when it was Labor policy, they now pretend is state of the art. It's been years since anyone credible has said that FTTN will do the job that Australia needs done.
you clearly have not the slightest idea what a CBA is - not a clue. and as for FTTN credibility, when you run around with hands over your ears, it is no wonder you don't hear anything you don't like.
but where is your support for the massive increase in bandwidth contention??? no facts on hand? hardly surprising.
so far my favourite official comment about labors NBN is that it will allow us to do 'online shopping'. I think that comment pretty much typifies the blind ignorance of the pro-ftth crowd.