rabbitoh07 wrote on Sep 1
st, 2013 at 5:43pm:
Yes.
And China represents 19% of all Humans
Australia represents 0.3% of all Humans
On average, very single Australian emits about 4 times more than every Chinese person.
Whether we stop or not will make quite a significant difference to the overall world Human CO2 emissions. SInce we are amongst the world's worst polluters - unless we stop, why would anyone else?
And what is this "heavy burden on Australian industry" you are talking about?
How is switching to renewable resources without ongoing fuel costs a "heavy burden"? Seems like a sensible choice to me. And to China - that is why they are using more and more renewables.
Why aren't we?
AArrhh yes the per capita statement, its the only way to panic the average person who doesn't know WTF is going on.
Well my gum tree has "X" amount of leaves per capita.
What does this tell you about
1. the leaves
2. the tree
3. the health of the above
4. the population
5. the location
Per capita is economic jargon for economists to somehow compare nations, its absolute rubbish.
Its the only way the alarmists can make Australia look bad in the global warming stakes.
Australia emits 1.5% of ALL manmade CO2 emissions.
1.5% = (450 mega tonnes)
China emits 25% of ALL manmade CO2 emissions.
25% = (7500 mega tonnes)
China emts about 17 times more CO2 than Australia does.
We are not even close to China's output so stop scaring your average Joe Bloggs with the per capita nonsense.