Australian Politics Forum - Why So Many Conservatives Deny The Climate Problem

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: Why So Many Conservatives Deny The Climate Problem
Reply #75 - Sep 21^st, 2013 at 1:53pm

Ajax wrote on Sep 21^st, 2013 at 1:49pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Sep 21^st, 2013 at 1:43pm:

Becoz conservatives don't believe in society!

Cheesy

That was easy.... Cool

On the contrary its greenies you should be worried about.

They place animals and plants ahead of humans...!!!!!

The Libs place foreigners above their own country! Yay, go foreign investor because murdoch says so!

Yay, i can tell my uppity friends that i too am tryhard upper middle class and will gladly join in the looking down the nostrils dance of the Liberal cliche!

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

Vuk11

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 1797
QLD
Gender: male

Re: Why So Many Conservatives Deny The Climate Problem
Reply #76 - Sep 21^st, 2013 at 1:55pm

muso wrote on Sep 9^th, 2013 at 9:53pm:

A runaway greenhouse effect is a process in which a net positive feedback between surface temperature and atmospheric opacity increases the strength of the greenhouse effect on a planet until its oceans boil away. An example of this is believed to have happened in the early history of Venus. On the Earth, the IPCC states that "a 'runaway greenhouse effect'—analogous to Venus—appears to have virtually no chance of being induced by anthropogenic activities

Did you understand that?

Do you have a short hand list of the worries of AGW?
I'm going to assume; Ocean levels, ocean acidification, extreme weather events, compounded warming rather than runaway?

Does the IPCC or anyone who proposes AGW, have a list of any net potential positives of c02 increases? (for example increased greening of the earth and or increased precipitation helping crop yields/plants that absorb c02)

Back to top

IP Logged

Ajax

Gold Member

Offline

CO2 has never controlled
temperature on Earth

Posts: 11070
Australia
Gender: male

Re: Why So Many Conservatives Deny The Climate Problem
Reply #77 - Sep 21^st, 2013 at 1:57pm

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Sep 21^st, 2013 at 1:53pm:

Ajax wrote on Sep 21^st, 2013 at 1:49pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Sep 21^st, 2013 at 1:43pm:

Becoz conservatives don't believe in society!

Cheesy

That was easy.... Cool

On the contrary its greenies you should be worried about.

They place animals and plants ahead of humans...!!!!!

The Libs place foreigners above their own country! Yay, go foreign investor because murdoch says so!

Yay, i can tell my uppity friends that i too am tryhard upper middle class and will gladly join in the looking down the nostrils dance of the Liberal cliche!

WTF.......dude are you on drugs...............?????

Back to top

1. There has never been a more serious assault on our standard of living than Anthropogenic Global Warming..Ajax
2. "One hour of freedom is worth more than 40 years of slavery & prison" Regas Feraeos

IP Logged

muso

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male

Re: Why So Many Conservatives Deny The Climate Problem
Reply #78 - Sep 21^st, 2013 at 6:08pm

Vuk11 wrote on Sep 21^st, 2013 at 1:55pm:

muso wrote on Sep 9^th, 2013 at 9:53pm:

A runaway greenhouse effect is a process in which a net positive feedback between surface temperature and atmospheric opacity increases the strength of the greenhouse effect on a planet until its oceans boil away. An example of this is believed to have happened in the early history of Venus. On the Earth, the IPCC states that "a 'runaway greenhouse effect'—analogous to Venus—appears to have virtually no chance of being induced by anthropogenic activities

Did you understand that?

Do you have a short hand list of the worries of AGW?
I'm going to assume; Ocean levels, ocean acidification, extreme weather events, compounded warming rather than runaway?

Does the IPCC or anyone who proposes AGW, have a list of any net potential positives of c02 increases? (for example increased greening of the earth and or increased precipitation helping crop yields/plants that absorb c02)

Yes and yes. It's in the AR4 Working Group II report.

This diagram summarises the risks. It's from AR4. I'm a bit suss about the leaked AR5. It's a little bit big to post directly on the forum:

http://www.ipcc.ch/graphics/syr/fig3-6.jpg

This refers to the Working Group II Report for further details. Here is the link:

http://www.ipcc.ch/img/books/ar4-wg2.gif

Back to top

1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded Gold Member Offline MediocrityNET: because people died for this! Posts: 26966	Re: Why So Many Conservatives Deny The Climate Problem Reply #79 - Sep 22^nd, 2013 at 6:13am Ajax my dear tryhard: the inability to explain externalities makes economics a living joke of a failed science! You couldn't sell a tv my fine feathered friend. Oh, and btw, the drugs don't make your words more powerful!!
Back to top	Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) IP Logged