Grey wrote on Nov 15^th, 2013 at 9:12pm:


So Grey you would be a member of the Melbourne Anarchist Communist Group, or are you just singular?

Grey wrote on Nov 15^th, 2013 at 9:12pm:


There are different categories of racism ~ something you haven't realised yet.

I too will accept anyone for who they are as a person, regardless of skin-colour.

But then I also recognise that when Negroes or Muslim Arabs or Aborigines come to live together in large numbers in urban ghettoes in white-majority societies ~ then it's a case of "Houston, we've got a problem".

These become hubs of crime and violence that are NO-GO areas to taxis at night. Ambulances called to these ghettoes need police escort to deter the locals from throwing bricks and bottles at the paramedics.

And God help a young un-hijabed white woman venturing naively into these areas.

In Paris the police no longer go into the project housing at night.

There's the individual ~ and then there's the Group-Think, colony-insect, urban tribalist blacks and Muslims.

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Nov 16^th, 2013 at 7:35am:


Thanks, Mistie, you’re right. A romanticist Prussian philosopher who had a big influence on the Nazis.

I missed that one.

I don’t imagine he influenced many Pakistanis, Mistie, do you?

I’d never heard about such Prussian nationalist sentiments until your post. Romantic nationalism you say?

Maybe we should ask the old boy. He’s a Hun. He likes Danish, you know.

If Johann Herder influenced Geert Wilders, he’d be a big fan. You?

Grendel wrote on Nov 15^th, 2013 at 9:40pm:


Anarchists are more interested in political structure than manifestos. I don't regard multiculturalism with any favour. But racism Anarchists regard as self-evidently stupid.

Lord Herbert wrote on Nov 16^th, 2013 at 7:43am:


If there wasn't any ethnicities you'd invent them Herbert. Marginalised people huddle together in ghettos. When the people are not marginalised the ghettos evaporate. 

Grey wrote on Nov 16^th, 2013 at 11:14pm:


'Marginalised' ~ my arse.

There are immigrant ethnicities who have a work ethic, and there are immigrant ethnicities for whom work is anathema.

The more patriarchal their background culture, the less inclined they are to put their hand to a piece of work.

Hence we have The Usual Suspects predominating in bone-idle occupations such as body-guards, strip-joint bouncers, corner shop convenience stores, taxi-drivers, security guards, hotel doormen, lift-operators, brothel receptionists, hospital orderlies, and O yes ~ crime.

ANY damn job that requires the least amount of energy and the most amount of do-nothing time for a wage.

And those among them who can't find a vacancy in one of these bone-bloody-idle occupations remain permanently on the dole which they supplement with petty crime of a drug dealing nature. The more clever among them manage to up their dole income by transferring to the Disability Support Pension.

The 'marginalisation' is ALL self-engendered as a product of generational sloth and 'macho' idleness in the men ~ as a cultural imperative.

In The Usual Suspect cultures it's actually shameful for a man to be seen labouring and sweating for a living. It loses 'face'. That's why all over the Muslim countries there are legions and legions of Indians and Filipinos doing all the heavy-lifting. 

Explorer Richard Burton wrote back to Queen Victoria that no effort should be made to colonise Egypt because the men were generationally habituated to a bone-idle life-style and could not be depended upon to do any productive work in any trade agreements with that country.

That was in total contrast to India and China where a strong work ethic has always existed.

Ghettoes are refuges for the lazy and the criminal who refuse to integrate and assimilate in the same way as the vast majority of ethnic immigrants do. 

 

I doubt you know exactly what you believe in Grey. You are a populist more than you are an anarchist. As long as onlookers perceive you to be magnanimous, that's all you are concerned with.