Lobo wrote on Aug 2
nd, 2013 at 4:52pm:
I'm presuming, as with the former bank taxes, FID and BADT, that any bank charges connected with this will be deductible items come Tax time....
Those old taxes were charged direct to accounts. They could only be offset against income.
The new levy will be paid by the banks. There should be no resultant charge to any account. Account holders will therefore have nothing to claim.
To the extent that a bank passes the levy on to an account holder, it will show up as a reduction in income. The outcome will be identical to claiming a charge against income.
The levy is intended to bring the cost of the deposit guarantee to the primary beneficiaries - the banks. The degree to which the banks can pass that business cost on to their customers, the market will govern.
For what it's worth, I expect to see further differentiation between parent banks and child institutions. RAMS (Westpac) and uBank (NAB) spring to mind. Parents will probably pass on more of the cost, because more of their customers have shown reluctance to move.
Loyalty certainly pays these days. Unfortunately, it doesn't pay the loyal.