Hi Muso

First I’m all for cleaning up manmade pollution that’s all the chemicals that corporations throw in our waterways and dump in landfills to save themselves some money, I’m not a grennie but I hate yobbos who litter our country and so do most of us now that’s a fact.

I have done my homework on AGW and yes I do understand how the greenhouse effect is suppose to work, I don’t need highly politicized IPCC propaganda to understand the science, like in your sticky above.

It’s simple and you don’t need to be a professor to understand it, the hypothesis the IPCC presents is that of the tropopause is heating up it may create a runaway greenhouse effect as I have explained above in my previous post.

This means that the temperature in the tropopause should be greater than the temperature at ground level, but guess what the exact opposite is true in the real world; this phenomenon is only found in their computer simulated models which cannot approximate the climate of the Earth at all.

Thousands of weather balloons and satellite data have failed to detect this hot spot which is the only piece of evidence coming out of the IPCC computer models, now why do you ignore this vital piece of information.

If the tropopause is heating up then the weather balloons and satellite data would have detected the hot spot but it doesn’t exist in the real world.

If that’s not the nail in the coffin I don’t know what is?

What about the fact that the IPCC amplify the effects of CO2 on their computer models to get the desired result, this leads to the hypothesis that more CO2 will lead to more water vapor and the cycle goes on.

This being the case there should be an abnormal amount of water vapor and CO2 around the equator, but guess what again empirical data has failed to show this is true, meaning that these theories don’t exist in the real world only on their computer models.

Not to mention that most of the warming in the last century happened before 1940 now they don’t tell you this do they?

Or that 1/3 of all manmade CO2 was released into the atmosphere AFTER 1998 yet we have had cooling not warming since 1998, meaning that the temperatures after 1998 have not surpassed the 1998 values, even the IPCC agree on this!

What happened to unequivocal warming??

Unfortunately I cannot post any sources because I have to reach 100 posts, so how do you know my sources are flawed?

Are you saying that CO2 drives warming here on planet Earth?

Because most scientists even the alarmists agree that CO2 lags temperature by about 800 years, they don’t tell you that do they.

BTW those graphs in your sticky that show the correlation between CO2 and temperature why are they all at around 450000 years scale, I’ll tell you because at this scale it looks as though CO2 & temperature correlate.

But we all know they don’t because CO2 follows temperature, temperature doesn’t follow the tiny amount CO2 in our atmosphere.

Water vapor is responsible for 95% of the greenhouse effect here on Earth….fact!!!!!

You should do your homework so Al Gore and his cronies cannot pull the wool over your eyes dude.

??????