A simple question:

Why are the boat people lovers afraid to offend Indonesia on this issue but are ruthless toward Australians that voice their opinion? Why would you take the side of a foreign power over the people of your own country?

Postmodern Trendoid wrote on Jul 18^th, 2013 at 12:00pm:


Yes, Mistie. Why can't we help the homeless?

Chimp_Logic wrote on Jul 18^th, 2013 at 12:55pm:



Thank you for your heated response, abuse, and lies. But do you actually have a reasoned argument? You seem to only have abuse and guilt.

There's no hypocrisy in my position. My position is clear: The people of Australia decide who comes here and the circumstances in which they arrive.

On another note, considering you have a guilt complex with Aboriginals, have you given them free food, free board, free everything at your place? If not, would not that be hypocritical?

Postmodern Trendoid wrote on Jul 18^th, 2013 at 2:37pm:


That's not what you originally asked, Mistie. You asked why the boat people lovers are unwilling to offend Indonesia.

I would have thought the answer to that one was self evident.

Chimp_Logic wrote on Jul 18^th, 2013 at 12:55pm:


Interesting that you use Belgium for example. Brussels, a city with over a million people, have about one-third of their countrymen who are Muslim. It is not difficult to understand that they would have 50,000 asylum seekers per year in Belgium. Consider that they have a population of asylum seekers large enough established to call for that number of refugees to come in to Belgium. Eventually, you will see native Belgians moving out of Belgium, fleeing the ethnic persecutions from the refugees, who consider it their God-given right to be their at their former hosts' funding.

I doubt any terrorist would risk a boat ride to Australia, when they can simply get a visa into the country, and come by plane to do their dirty work. That is not my concern in regards to boat people. I do genuinely agree that they are coming in search of a better life for themselves. But in the past, that was the point of contention. Whether they are coming to Australia, fraudulently claiming refugee status, for the purpose of a better life. Or whether they are actually coming to Australia on genuine grounds.

I happen to work with some asylum seekers -- only a few -- who were on the boat to Australia, because they were fleeing persecution from their own government. In the case of Sri Lankan asylum seekers, I believe they do have a legitimate claim.

Reckon we're screwed if the Indonesian government forces a situation where Indonesians themselves are headed in our direction.

I think the idea is that it will be a lot easier to solve the problem with Indonesia's help. Our interests are not that different. Pissing them off to score domestic political points would be silly. There is no point trying to approach this problem with an "us against the rest of the world" mentality. People smuggling is a global problem, with close ties to illegal trade in arms, drugs, sex slaves etc.

Postmodern Trendoid wrote on Jul 18^th, 2013 at 12:00pm:





Because they're paid in copper to further the agenda

just like that motley mob of ruffians pretending to 'protest' on behalf of the 'poor reffos'



Indonesia is OWNED by foreign powers

and the agenda -- as the US politician mouthed according to script the other day -- is 'total eradication of whites'

The agenda's well under way

They figure the tinted people will be more malleable

will have less principle

will spend their lives working for peanuts and their nights breeding more mindless consumers and living in the casinos

They probably only want to keep a handful of whites

for when they need something useful to be invented

and when they need things fixing


Hey, they can have it. Don't fight it.  Walk away and head off-planet Shithole

Leave them to it

Serve them right