Brian Ross wrote on Jul 24^th, 2015 at 9:00pm:


People don't leave Kennesaw because they don't want to be forced to own guns.

This is a false argument you make Bry, because they don't enforce the law, & no one has ever been cited for being in violation of the gun law since
the laws adoption in 1982 fool.

No oppression, no citizen complaints, just a fake claim from a typical agenda driven head deep in the ass anti-gunner leftist, making false accusations about  people he hasn't a clue about, doesn't know, & never will.

Burns his ass that people actually like guns, & want to live side by side in Freedom & Liberty with their guns, not oppressed by a gun-grabbing, anti-freedom  government , but in total control of their government hired to serve them, like it should be.

Brian, go troll another topic.   

Mortdooley wrote on Jul 24^th, 2015 at 9:48pm:



Sorry thats not how science or even criminal justice works.

Mortdooley wrote on Jul 24^th, 2015 at 10:53pm:



You really are batshit crazy

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jul 24^th, 2015 at 11:21pm:


He is an American, being batshit crazy is part and parcel of his upbringing...   

Panther wrote on Jul 25^th, 2015 at 11:15am:


The law exists.  It is oppressive.  It states that you must own a gun if you live within the city limits.  Therefore, enforced or not, it is logically an oppressive law.  That you support it, means you are supporting an oppressive law.  You don't care one whit about real freedom, Panther.  You are a hypocrite.  QED.   

Baronvonrort wrote on Jul 25^th, 2015 at 11:48am:


He may be a 'perceived' minority, but those just like him could very well be a 'silent' majority.
Similar to the actual number of firearms in America, & who owns them, it's only a best guess estimate. In reality though, it's definitely closer to a total unknown because there isn't any Federal Registration Database in America, never has been.....it's illegal.

Even in American localities where some form of registration is "mandatory", getting better than 15%  --  20% participation/compliance is a monumental challenge for government.

Recently, after the Sandy Hook Elementary School shootings, Connecticut passed a knee-jerk firearm law that said, among many things, that all 'so called' scarey assault rifles, AR15s, must be registered, thousands upon thousands of AR15 owners (over 50,000 its estimated) refused to do so, & refuse to till this day even though it is punishable under Connecticut law.

Source: 

BEARING Arms

  http://bit.ly/1KpHQhH Quote:


Effectively, this was the way Connecticut Gun Owning Citizens basically Nullified that knee-jerk Law.

They openly dared the Government to "Come 'n get 'em!".

Considering Connecticut is considered one of the last renaming 'true' Blue States  --  firmly left of center, Democrat  --  I guess it tells the true story of where Middle America actually stands on Gun Rights.

To date the government can't figure out what to do  --  they're out matched (& out gunned) by a rock steady, organized citizenry. Many in Local Law Enforcement there say they will refuse to enforce that law in a show of solidarity with the citizenry.

For those that aren't familiar, this happens more often than you would think in the States.

Americans don't like government getting into their concerns  --  toying with their rights, freedom, & liberty.

It's been that way for hundreds of years.

I strongly agree with the basic American attitude of openly distrusting government.

Government should never be trusted absolutely, nor should government have any uninvited right into any citizens personal, & private life. An officer needs evidence of criminality or dangerousness before he may detain and disarm a law-abiding citizen openly carrying a firearm.

I also think I would tend to agree with Mort way, way more than I would disagree, & unlike many,  I don't see Mort's views (that I know of) as being too,
far from center in America.

Brian Ross wrote on Jul 25^th, 2015 at 11:39am:


Noun: oppression


[WordWeb.info]

#3.... Oppression is a feeling, & if the public doesn't perceive/feel the law to be overly unjust, by definition it isn't & can't be oppressive.

#2.... If the law isn't enforced, & as in #3 the population doesn't consider the law oppressive, it flatly fails to be oppressive.

#1..... See #2, & #3 ..... there is no cruelty whatsoever, therefore it isn't oppressive.



Bry..........how's the crow taste buddy!? 

Brian Ross wrote on Jul 25^th, 2015 at 3:29pm:


Read my link(s) earlier.

The mere fact that since the law's passage in 1982 the town has grown seven fold in population, & is still growing is testimony to the fact that there isn't oppression in that town, & opposite to your contention that people are leaving, the population has soared....not diminished.

It' is you Brian that need to prove that the people are "Oppressed", & that they are leaving the city in numbers because of your unfounded assertions.

Sh!t or get off the pot Bry.....You prove  your false assertion that people have left because they don't want to own a firearm. That's your claim, not mine. My only claim about leaving is that they would have no reason to leave unless they simply wanted to leave as is their right, not because of any feelings of Oppression, which I've presented repeatedly.

Times runnin' out on you sonny, the walls are closin' in on ya.....there's nowhere left to run.......

Balls in yer court laddy, time to sh!t or get off the pot!

So far all you've done is flap your gums & spew yer verbal diarrhea about the city, its citizens, & how they feel.....but
substantiated absolutely bothing....ziltch.....zero....Nada