Guns & the Gun Culture become deeper entrenched into American Culture.
The Second Reigns Supreme In Missouri
Source: America's 1
st Freedom
http://tinyurl.com/q7t4z67 Quote:Last August, Missouri voters went to the polls and made a stand for their Second Amendment freedoms. They overwhelmingly passed Constitutional Amendment 5, which enables Missourians to own, carry and use a firearm for self-defense or sporting purposes without fear of political overreach. The voters made their voice heard.
But Michael Bloomberg went tone-deaf and tuned out the defeat. He then responded in the only way he knows how—with cold cash. He funded a lawsuit that challenged the ballot as “insufficient.” St. Louis Police Chief Sam Dotson and Moms Demand Action organizer Rebecca Morgan tried to convince the court that the voters who supported the amendment last August were misled by a ballot summary that failed to properly explain the amendment.
But this week the Missouri Supreme Court disagreed, upholding the election results as valid. We can only presume that Bloomberg had his hands over his ears for the verdict.
In the USA the States basically have veto power over Federal Law.
Why?
Because it says so in the US Constitution, that's why.

The Tenth Amendment to the US Constitution says it very clearly & forcefully:
Quote:The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution Quote:The Tenth Amendment (Amendment X) to the United States Constitution, which is part of the Bill of Rights, was ratified on December 15, 1791.[1] It expresses the principle of federalism, which undergirds the entire plan of the original Constitution, by stating that the federal government possesses only those powers delegated to it by the Constitution. All remaining powers are reserved for the states or the people. In drafting this amendment, its framers had two purposes in mind: first, as a necessary rule of construction; and second, as a reaffirmation of the nature of the federal system.[2]
Could this be a possible reason why the Australian Government is so afraid about even considering a plain & simple, easy to read & understand
Bill of Rights for the Australian People?
God forbid if the Australian People & their Government had a list of Inalienable Rights to live by.