Brian Ross wrote on Jun 7
th, 2015 at 8:32pm:
Lionel Edriess wrote on Jun 7
th, 2015 at 8:06pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Jun 7
th, 2015 at 6:43pm:
You keep being deliberately obtuse, Lionel, why?
"Scale" refers to the number of weapons, nothing more, Lionel...
Obtuse? Me?
Yes, you, Lionel. You're smarter than this normally...
Quote:You just don't want to play the game, Brian. "The numbers of weapons" has little to do with the topic at hand, or even the OP.
Funny, yet that is the excuse used by Panther, Mort, Marla as to why the US can never be 'disarmed", Lionel.
You've decided to include the police and its' weaponry. I just pointed out the same problem exists here. You seem to have taken exception my pointing that out for some reason...
Ok, then let's extend an unlikely scenario, shall we?
An Executive Order is issued that all firearms in the US are to be either surrendered or registered by such a date.
Unilateral compliance to this order is unlikely to happen, so then all those don't comply are in violation of the 'law', notwithstanding the Constitution.
Then the fit hits the shan.
Somewhere along the line, a situation is bound to develop, by whatever force is deployed to enforce that order, that will provoke a reaction which will be felt on a national level.
Then we'll have guerrilla warfare in the USA.
The Oath of Allegiance might be sworn to by every American soldier, Brian, but I really doubt that the majority would consider their own people as 'domestic terrorists' en masse.
Anarchy will bloom, and it won't be pretty.
And if it comes to
that, and the rest of the world accepts it, then it's no longer a global society in which I wish to live.
The USA being disarmed - I can't see it in the foreseeable future.
American citizenry rearming I can understand. Their society is in meltdown, aided and abetted by a Muslim President.
Next!