Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 20 21 22 23 24 ... 63
Send Topic Print
Disarming USA (Read 95857 times)
rhino
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17179
Gender: male
Re: Disarming USA
Reply #315 - May 23rd, 2015 at 4:13pm
 
Panther wrote on May 23rd, 2015 at 3:11pm:
Brian Ross wrote on May 23rd, 2015 at 1:04pm:
Panther wrote on May 22nd, 2015 at 8:42pm:
Brian Ross wrote on May 22nd, 2015 at 8:31pm:
Panther wrote on May 22nd, 2015 at 10:22am:
Here in Australia self-defense isn't such a big deal..........yet, but in America self-defense is probably one of the top issues after breathing clean air, to some more so.


Self-defense is only an issue in a society where it is required.  In Australia, by and large, it isn't required.  QED.   Roll Eyes




I agree to a point.


Considering how safe our society is and becoming, with decreasing crime rates, by and large, how can you therefore claim, "yet"?  All the trends are that violent crime is decreasing, DRX.   Therefore one must conclude that self-defence is becoming of decreasing, not increasing importance and will remain so...   Roll Eyes



If you're personally secure Brian, that's all that really matters. Smiley







don't read this
Brians right, and even the US is not as violent as you imagine, most people who want to walk around armed are just scared for no good reason.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Panther
Gold Member
*****
Offline


My Heart beats True for
the Red White & Blue...

Posts: 11850
Gender: male
Re: Disarming USA
Reply #316 - May 23rd, 2015 at 10:05pm
 
So, we are getting closer to the Topic.....do you realistically believe that the USA can,
& will be, disarmed by their government, & if so how, & if not.........well, then we totally agree. ...
Back to top
« Last Edit: May 23rd, 2015 at 10:18pm by Panther »  

"When the People fear government there is Tyranny;
When government fears the People there is Freedom & Liberty!"

'
Live FREE or DIE!
'
 
IP Logged
 
Mortdooley
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 7311
Texas Gulf Coast
Gender: male
Re: Disarming USA
Reply #317 - May 23rd, 2015 at 11:07pm
 
I saw a movie where only the Police and Military had guns, it was called "Shindler"s List"!




Back to top
 

The only difference between a Communist and a Democrat is the spelling.
 
IP Logged
 
rhino
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17179
Gender: male
Re: Disarming USA
Reply #318 - May 23rd, 2015 at 11:29pm
 
Panther wrote on May 23rd, 2015 at 10:05pm:
So, we are getting closer to the Topic.....do you realistically believe that the USA can,
& will be, disarmed by their government, & if so how, & if not.........well, then we totally agree. http://www.smileyfaze.tk/slides/exitstageright.gif

Not only can, has been. there have been a number of instances in the US where weapons have been confiscated en masse with no resistance. Hurricane Katrina being the most recent I can remember.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Panther
Gold Member
*****
Offline


My Heart beats True for
the Red White & Blue...

Posts: 11850
Gender: male
Re: Disarming USA
Reply #319 - May 23rd, 2015 at 11:55pm
 
rhino wrote on May 23rd, 2015 at 11:29pm:
Panther wrote on May 23rd, 2015 at 10:05pm:
So, we are getting closer to the Topic.....do you realistically believe that the USA can,
& will be, disarmed by their government, & if so how, & if not.........well, then we totally agree. http://www.smileyfaze.tk/slides/exitstageright.gif

Not only can, has been. there have been a number of instances in the US where weapons have been confiscated en masse with no resistance. Hurricane Katrina being the most recent I can remember.

How long did that little police debacle last? 

Louisiana has more firearms today then they ever had.


As reported in the USA TODAY
(link)
Quote:
NEW ORLEANS (AP) — City officials have agreed to return hundreds of firearms that police officers confiscated in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, part of a deal to resolve a lawsuit filed by gun lobbying groups.

The settlement agreement filed Tuesday in federal court calls for the National Rifle Association and Second Amendment Foundation to drop their case if the city follows a plan for returning guns to owners who had them seized by police after the Aug. 29, 2005, hurricane.

Both sides also are asking U.S. District Judge Carl Barbier to sign off on the pact and issue a permanent injunction barring the city from seizing lawfully possessed firearms. Barbier didn't immediately rule on the agreement, which doesn't involve a monetary award.

Police department spokesman Bob Young said it has stored 552 guns that were confiscated after Katrina, through Dec. 31, 2005. Police have said they only took guns that were stolen or found in abandoned homes.


The agreement calls for the city to post a notice on its website that explains how gun owners can claim their firearms.

Gun owners must sign an affidavit claiming ownership of a gun but don't need to present written proof, such as a sales receipt or serial number. A background check also is required to certify that someone claiming a gun can legally possess a firearm.
The city won't be liable if a dispute arises over the ownership of a returned gun. Authorities can dispose of any guns that go unclaimed after two years.
"This is all we've wanted all along: a practical return program," said NRA lawyer Stephen Halbrook, who estimated that the department should have 1,200 guns available for owners to claim.
"I think it satisfies all our concerns," said Dave Workman, a spokesman for the Bellevue, Wash.-based Second Amendment Foundation. "The city for way too long has been dragging its feet on this. We're glad it's over and we can move on to other issues."....continued


Wikipedia
(link)
Quote:
Controversy arose over a September 8 city-wide order by New Orleans Police Superintendent Eddie Compass to local police, U.S. Army National Guard soldiers, and Deputy U.S. Marshals to confiscate all civilian-held firearms. "No one will be able to be armed," Compass said. "Guns will be taken. Only law enforcement will be allowed to have guns." Seizures were carried out without warrant, and in some cases with excessive force; one instance captured on film involved 58 year old New Orleans resident Patricia Konie. Konie stayed behind, in her well provisioned home, and had an old revolver for protection. A group of police entered the house, and when she refused to surrender her revolver, she was tackled and it was removed by force. Konie's shoulder was fractured, and she was taken into police custody for failing to surrender her firearm.

Angered citizens, backed by the National Rifle Association and other organizations, filed protests over the constitutionality of such an order and the difficulty in tracking seizures, as paperwork was rarely filed during the searches. Wayne LaPierre, CEO of the National Rifle Association, defended the right of affected citizens to retain firearms, saying that, "What we’ve seen in Louisiana - the breakdown of law and order in the aftermath of disaster - is exactly the kind of situation where the Second Amendment was intended to allow citizens to protect themselves." The searches received little news coverage, though reaction from groups such as the NRA, the Second Amendment Foundation, and Gun Owners of America was immediate and heated, and a lawsuit was filed September 22 by the NRA and SAF on behalf of two firearm owners whose firearms were seized. On September 23, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana issued a restraining order to bar further firearms confiscations.

After refusing to admit that it had any seized firearms, the city revealed in mid-March that it did have a cache of some 1000 firearms seized after the hurricane; this disclosure came after the NRA filed a motion in court to hold the city in contempt for failure to comply with the US District Court's earlier order to return all seized firearms. On April 14,2006, it was announced that the city will begin to return seized firearms, however as of early 2008, many firearms were still in police possession, and the matter was still in court. The matter was finally settled in favor of the NRA in October 2008. Per the agreement, the city was required to relax the strict proof of ownership
Back to top
« Last Edit: May 24th, 2015 at 12:09am by Panther »  

"When the People fear government there is Tyranny;
When government fears the People there is Freedom & Liberty!"

'
Live FREE or DIE!
'
 
IP Logged
 
rhino
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17179
Gender: male
Re: Disarming USA
Reply #320 - May 23rd, 2015 at 11:58pm
 
well since your point was that US citizens would never give up their firearms willingly then I have pretty well demolished that line of argument. Anything else?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Mortdooley
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 7311
Texas Gulf Coast
Gender: male
Re: Disarming USA
Reply #321 - May 24th, 2015 at 12:12am
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zd8q_rvcAP4

This ended the political career of Kathleen Blanco and New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin is in Prison on an unrelated conviction.

Not everyone followed illegal orders!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2HRZfvtYlCY
Back to top
 

The only difference between a Communist and a Democrat is the spelling.
 
IP Logged
 
Panther
Gold Member
*****
Offline


My Heart beats True for
the Red White & Blue...

Posts: 11850
Gender: male
Re: Disarming USA
Reply #322 - May 24th, 2015 at 12:13am
 
rhino wrote on May 23rd, 2015 at 11:58pm:
well since your point was that US citizens would never give up their firearms willingly then I have pretty well demolished that line of argument. Anything else?


As posted above:
Quote:
Police department spokesman Bob Young said it has stored 552 guns that were confiscated after Katrina, through Dec. 31, 2005. Police have said they only took guns that were stolen or found in abandoned homes.


Confiscated en masse?
  Grin Grin Grin Roll Eyes

Government was forced to backpedal, return all firearms, & relax the laws on the books making ownership difficult.

Your next example of confiscation en masse?     ...
Back to top
« Last Edit: May 24th, 2015 at 12:39am by Panther »  

"When the People fear government there is Tyranny;
When government fears the People there is Freedom & Liberty!"

'
Live FREE or DIE!
'
 
IP Logged
 
rhino
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17179
Gender: male
Re: Disarming USA
Reply #323 - May 24th, 2015 at 12:24am
 
Mortdooley wrote on May 24th, 2015 at 12:12am:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zd8q_rvcAP4

This ended the political career of Kathleen Blanco and New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin is in Prison on an unrelated conviction.

Not everyone followed illegal orders!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2HRZfvtYlCY
But it still happened Mort. your people willingly gave up their firearms, and its not the first time they have.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
rhino
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17179
Gender: male
Re: Disarming USA
Reply #324 - May 24th, 2015 at 12:25am
 
Panther wrote on May 24th, 2015 at 12:13am:
rhino wrote on May 23rd, 2015 at 11:58pm:
well since your point was that US citizens would never give up their firearms willingly then I have pretty well demolished that line of argument. Anything else?


As posted above:
Quote:
Police department spokesman Bob Young said it has stored 552 guns that were confiscated after Katrina, through Dec. 31, 2005. Police have said they only took guns that were stolen or found in abandoned homes.


Confiscated en masse?
  Grin Grin Grin Roll Eyes

Government was forced to backpedal, return all firearms, & relax the laws on the books making ownership difficult.

Your next example of confiscation en masse?     http://www.smileyfaze.tk/slides/imthinkin6.gif
But it still happened.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Panther
Gold Member
*****
Offline


My Heart beats True for
the Red White & Blue...

Posts: 11850
Gender: male
Re: Disarming USA
Reply #325 - May 24th, 2015 at 12:41am
 
rhino wrote on May 24th, 2015 at 12:25am:
Panther wrote on May 24th, 2015 at 12:13am:
rhino wrote on May 23rd, 2015 at 11:58pm:
well since your point was that US citizens would never give up their firearms willingly then I have pretty well demolished that line of argument. Anything else?


As posted above:
Quote:
Police department spokesman Bob Young said it has stored 552 guns that were confiscated after Katrina, through Dec. 31, 2005 .......... they only took guns that were stolen or found in abandoned homes.


Confiscated en masse?
  Grin Grin Grin Roll Eyes

Government was forced to backpedal, return all firearms, & relax the laws on the books making ownership difficult.

Your next example of confiscation en masse?     http://www.smileyfaze.tk/slides/imthinkin6.gif
But it still happened.


The police said themselves "......552 guns that were confiscated after Katrina, through Dec. 31, 2005 ......... they only took guns that were stolen or found in abandoned homes."

Is that your confiscation en masse?

When else then, before or after?

When else did the Government attempt to confiscate American's Legal Firearms en masse?


I could answer that one myself, but I would rather hear you say it.
Back to top
« Last Edit: May 24th, 2015 at 12:50am by Panther »  

"When the People fear government there is Tyranny;
When government fears the People there is Freedom & Liberty!"

'
Live FREE or DIE!
'
 
IP Logged
 
rhino
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17179
Gender: male
Re: Disarming USA
Reply #326 - May 24th, 2015 at 1:11am
 
my sources show more than 1000 guns were confiscated Bobby, most directly from owners. I dont need to provide any other example Bobby, your arguement is gone.  Americans gave up their firearms. Not one offered resistance, unless you can provide an example where one did. otherwise your arguement that americans will never give up their firearms without resistance is gone, because all these Americans who were told to by the police did. Not one didnt. And I will tell you something for nothing, the fact that these Americans offered no resistance has nothing to do with whether they were American or not. You really need to stop watching so many american cowboy movies.
Back to top
« Last Edit: May 24th, 2015 at 1:36am by rhino »  
 
IP Logged
 
rhino
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17179
Gender: male
Re: Disarming USA
Reply #327 - May 24th, 2015 at 1:33am
 
......
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Mortdooley
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 7311
Texas Gulf Coast
Gender: male
Re: Disarming USA
Reply #328 - May 24th, 2015 at 10:03am
 
There are videos of NOPD Officers looting businesses. The gun seizures were just an excuse to break into homes and steal anything of value.

If several men in body armor and pointing rifles came to force their way into your home you could challenge them to a fist fight!

The volunteers who came to rescue stranded people could be seen wearing handguns. They had the full support of government to protect themselves and others, the chocolat city was a very dangerous place during that time. Thugs were shooting at rescue helicopters  and small boats day and night.

Hurricane Rita came next and a Texas State Judge made the Official Statement that any home owner could protect not only his own home but his entire neighborhood with deadly force from looters. There was no looting and no one was shot!
Back to top
 

The only difference between a Communist and a Democrat is the spelling.
 
IP Logged
 
Mortdooley
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 7311
Texas Gulf Coast
Gender: male
Re: Disarming USA
Reply #329 - May 24th, 2015 at 12:14pm
 
For your listening pleasure.....
Back to top
« Last Edit: May 24th, 2015 at 12:20pm by Mortdooley »  

The only difference between a Communist and a Democrat is the spelling.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 20 21 22 23 24 ... 63
Send Topic Print