Mortdooley wrote on Apr 27^th, 2015 at 1:14am:


Problem is, not one of you Tea Party dweebs actually believes that much less can define the words.

Mortdooley wrote on Apr 27^th, 2015 at 1:14am:


Also odd, when one considers just how many Tea Party members are living off welfare.

Mortdooley wrote on Apr 27^th, 2015 at 1:14am:


Yeah, it's called a "401K" Too bad so many in your party couldn't keep their grubby hands off of them.

Mortdooley wrote on Apr 27^th, 2015 at 8:47am:


Your Thatcher quote is quite appropriate, & spot on.  The Progressive Left avoids admitting that fact like the plague, always opting to find other forms of borrowing and debt advancement rather than admit their policies will eventually need to be paid for, and are a 'failing' system, to extend the lifespan of their blindly expanding socialistic agendas.
As far as Tea Party people being on welfare, I would have to think there are an average amount of TPers on some sort of government system that they didn't pay into, for the Tea Party membership crosses across just about every socio-economic and ethnic component of society and are not what the Left want's everyone to believe, that they are all white, rich, right-wing, gun toting, extremists.  The Tea Party is far from that, and only fools fall for that drivel.

Panther wrote on Apr 27^th, 2015 at 10:23am:



So could you provide an example of a Tea party person who isnt right wing.

From what I read of left libertarianism hardly any are tea partiers

But then again I know beyond a doubt you're wrong.

Well I was more having a go at your statement about knowing beyond a doubt. You probably do think you know beyond a doubt, but thats some sort of cognitive bias.

Brian Ross wrote on Apr 26^th, 2015 at 6:54pm:


Perhaps your ignorance is why nobody goes to your sad pathetic forum bwian,you don't need to sneak chocolates into the movies you dim wit.

Quote:

Panther wrote on Apr 27^th, 2015 at 10:23am:


Oh right, right. Like, for example, how many "lefties" out there are paying for Bush's War on socialistic agendas.


Panther wrote on Apr 27^th, 2015 at 10:23am:



Well, you're half-right. What's that term you Aussie's use.."bogans" or something like that? Think of disenfranchised bogans only with guns living in trailer parks with their second cousins and that is essentially the American Tea Party.

Really? Interesting.

The Urban Dictionary describes Bogans as:
"A fascinating beast. The majority of the species are hideously repugnant and unintelligent, and yet they manage to breed in ever-increasing numbers and populate an area known as the outer west. It is quite common to find five or six offspring in each family group, often with a different father for each new baby.

Their habitat consists of a weatherboard or brick-veneer dwelling and is characterised by an early-model Holden or Ford in the driveway surrounded by a group of males discussing why the carby is stuffed and the results of last night's footy (a primitive gladiator-like spectator sport enjoyed by most bogans)."


Uncanny.